BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1,500 results for “disallowance”+ Section 16clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai11,183Delhi9,690Bangalore3,389Chennai3,153Kolkata2,784Ahmedabad2,271Pune1,812Hyderabad1,597Jaipur1,500Surat899Chandigarh861Indore825Raipur521Visakhapatnam472Cochin470Rajkot412Cuttack408Amritsar350Karnataka345Nagpur301Lucknow274Agra168Jodhpur161Guwahati136Panaji118Ranchi113Telangana105Allahabad104SC101Patna74Calcutta69Dehradun67Kerala35Jabalpur33Varanasi33Punjab & Haryana10Rajasthan8Orissa7A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN6Himachal Pradesh5Gauhati2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Tripura1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 26380Addition to Income78Section 36(1)(va)64Disallowance62Section 143(3)58Section 14745Section 14835Section 143(1)33Section 43B30Deduction

AHLUWALIA ERECTORS & FABRICATORS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOTA,KOTA vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR-2, KOTA

In the result the appeal of\nthe assessee in ITA no 199/JP/2025 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 199/JPR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Nov 2025AY 2022-23
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 250Section 43B

16-\n17 of Rs.62,99,520/-. In the absence of relevant evidence, the AO held that the\nsame was unpaid within the stipulated time period as per provision of section 43B\nof the Act and Hence, he disallowed

AHLUWALIA ERECTORS & FABRICATORS PRIVATE LIMITED, KOTA,KOTA vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR-2, KOTA, KOTA

Showing 1–20 of 1,500 · Page 1 of 75

...
29
Section 35A25
Limitation/Time-bar14

In the result the appeal of\nthe assessee in ITA no 199/JP/2025 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 198/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Nov 2025AY 2021-22
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 250Section 43B

16-\n17 of Rs.62,99,520/-. In the absence of relevant evidence, the AO held that the\nsame was unpaid within the stipulated time period as per provision of section 43B\nof the Act and Hence, he disallowed

AHLUWALIA ERECTORS & FABRICATORS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOTA vs. DCIT/ACIT CIR-2, KOTA

In the result the appeal of\nthe assessee in ITA no 199/JP/2025 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 197/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Nov 2025AY 2019-20
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, AdvFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 250Section 43B

16-\n17 of Rs.62,99,520/-. In the absence of relevant evidence, the AO held that the\nsame was unpaid within the stipulated time period as per provision of section 43B\nof the Act and Hence, he disallowed

CHAMBAL FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED,KOTA vs. DCIT, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 201/JPR/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 May 2022AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Percy PardiwallaFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Dhariwal (CIT)
Section 40A(2)(b)

section 14A of the Act and the disallowance of Rs. 24.90 lakhs sustained by the CIT(A) should be allowed as a deduction to the Appellant. 16

M/S. CHAMBAL FERTILIZERS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED,KOTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 744/JPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 May 2022AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Percy PardiwallaFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Dhariwal (CIT)
Section 40A(2)(b)

section 14A of the Act and the disallowance of Rs. 24.90 lakhs sustained by the CIT(A) should be allowed as a deduction to the Appellant. 16

CHAMBAL FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED,KOTA vs. ACIT, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 291/JPR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 May 2022AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Percy PardiwallaFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Dhariwal (CIT)
Section 40A(2)(b)

section 14A of the Act and the disallowance of Rs. 24.90 lakhs sustained by the CIT(A) should be allowed as a deduction to the Appellant. 16

ZUBERI ENGINEERING COMPANY,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and that of revenue’s cross appeal is dismissed

ITA 978/JPR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur18 Dec 2018AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel (Adv)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT-DR)
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 251Section 40

16,42,27,060/-. The assessment was completed U/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act) by the Assessing Officer on 30/3/2015 at a total income of Rs. 19,15,23,899/-. The Assessing Officer made various disallowances while passing the assessment order. Identical disallowances ITA 977 to 979/JP/2018 & 1122/JP/2018_ 3 Zuberi Engineering Vs DCIT

ZUBERI ENGINEERING COMPANY,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, JAIPUR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and that of revenue’s cross appeal is dismissed

ITA 977/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur18 Dec 2018AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel (Adv)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT-DR)
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 251Section 40

16,42,27,060/-. The assessment was completed U/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act) by the Assessing Officer on 30/3/2015 at a total income of Rs. 19,15,23,899/-. The Assessing Officer made various disallowances while passing the assessment order. Identical disallowances ITA 977 to 979/JP/2018 & 1122/JP/2018_ 3 Zuberi Engineering Vs DCIT

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR vs. ZUBERI ENGINEERING COMPANY, JAIPUR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and that of revenue’s cross appeal is dismissed

ITA 1122/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur18 Dec 2018AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel (Adv)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT-DR)
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 251Section 40

16,42,27,060/-. The assessment was completed U/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act) by the Assessing Officer on 30/3/2015 at a total income of Rs. 19,15,23,899/-. The Assessing Officer made various disallowances while passing the assessment order. Identical disallowances ITA 977 to 979/JP/2018 & 1122/JP/2018_ 3 Zuberi Engineering Vs DCIT

ZUBERI ENGINEERING COMPANY,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and that of revenue’s cross appeal is dismissed

ITA 979/JPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur18 Dec 2018AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel (Adv)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT-DR)
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)Section 251Section 40

16,42,27,060/-. The assessment was completed U/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act) by the Assessing Officer on 30/3/2015 at a total income of Rs. 19,15,23,899/-. The Assessing Officer made various disallowances while passing the assessment order. Identical disallowances ITA 977 to 979/JP/2018 & 1122/JP/2018_ 3 Zuberi Engineering Vs DCIT

GIRNAR SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED,6TH FLOOR, JAIPUR TEXTILE MARKET, B-2, NEAR MODEL TOWN, MALVIYA NAGAR, JAIPUR vs. PCIT – 2, JAIPUR, NEW CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 330/JPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & HON’BLE SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri PC Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar (CIT)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 263

disallowance under section 14A of the Act, it is necessary that exempt income is earned by the assessee during the previous year. Thus, the Circular issued by CBDT do not lay out the correct position of law. This has specifically been clarified by the Delhi High Court in the case of PCIT vs. IL & FS Energy Development 16

NIRMAL KUMAR BARDIYA,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 260/JPR/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 May 2022AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma, CA &For Respondent: Smt. Runi Paul, Addl. CIT
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowed under Section 43B or under Section 36(1)(va) of the IT Act.” 16. The said decision has subsequently

RMC GEMS INDIA LTD,JAIPUR vs. ADIT, CPC, BANGLORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 259/JPR/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 May 2022AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma, CA &For Respondent: Smt. Runi Paul, Addl. CIT
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowed under Section 43B or under Section 36(1)(va) of the IT Act.” 16. The said decision has subsequently

MODERN INSULATORS LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 74/JPR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 Dec 2019AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Madhukar Garg (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Runi Pal (JCIT)
Section 14A

disallowance is called for under section 14A. The Hon’ble Madras High Court in case of CIT vs. Chettinad Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (supra) has held in para 9 to 16

GOSIL EXPORTS PVT LTD,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE -I, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 163/JPR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur16 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Due Date Of Filing Return.’’

For Appellant: Shri S.L. Gupta, CAFor Respondent: Shri N.S. Nehra, Addl. CIT
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowed under Section 43B or under Section 36(1)(va) of the IT Act.” 16. The said decision has subsequently

AMIT SINGH,BHIWADI (ALWAR) vs. DCIT, CPC- BENGALURU, CPC- BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessees is allowed

ITA 284/JPR/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Mar 2022AY 2018-2019
For Appellant: Shri Rahish Mohammed (C.A.)For Respondent: Smt. Runi Pal (Addl.CIT) a
Section 143(1)Section 2(24)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowed under Section 43B or under Section 36(1)(va) of the IT Act.” 16. The said decision has subsequently

ACIT, CIRCLE, BHARATPUR vs. M/S. JAGDAMBE STONE COMPANY, BHARATPUR

In the result, this appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1171/JPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Mar 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Gupta (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Rooni Paul (Addl.CIT-DR) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 143(2)Section 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 40

disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) read with section 194C of the Act. IN this regard, he placed reliance on the judgement of ITAT Kolkata in the case of Soma Rani Ghosh Vs DCIT Kolkata, ITA No. 1420/KOL/2015. Once the conditions of Section 194C(6) is satisfied, the liability to deduct the TDS would cease and accordingly, application of section

DOLCAS BOTANOSYS PVT. LTD. BIKANER,BIKANER vs. ADIT, CPC, BANGLORE/ACIT, C-1 JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 50/JPR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 May 2022AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri Amit Kothari, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Runi Pal, Addl. CIT
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowed under Section 43B or under Section 36(1)(va) of the IT Act.” 16. 15 M/s. Dolcas Botanosys Pvt. Ltd. vs ADIT

M/S RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD.,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed as indicated hereinabove

ITA 310/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur06 Aug 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI GAGAN GOYAL (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 80

16,000 Nil Short credit of TDS 15,65,426 Nil Nil Thus after the order of ITAT dt.10.04.2018 (PB 25-94), following disallowance made by the AO stood confirmed:- Disallowance of CSR Expenses Rs.40,42,000/- Disallowance u/s 14A Rs.37,19,337/- After the order of Hon’ble ITAT, AO again issued notice dt.14.03.2019 (PB 17) to show cause

CAREER POINT LIMITED,KOTA, RAJASTHAN vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, UDAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 242/JPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Aug 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & HON’BLE SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Goyal, CA &For Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik (CIT)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263

16-17/Vol-1 21/1029027261(1) The very basis of initiation of proceedings under Section 263 is that any order passed by the Assessing Officer is erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Assessment order as passed by Ld. AO is enclosed herewith at PB page no. 13-14/Vol-1 for your kind perusal