BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 12A(1)(ba)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi20Pune19Bangalore16Mumbai14Kolkata12Hyderabad7Chennai7Indore7Ahmedabad6Jaipur5Jodhpur3Surat2Cochin1Patna1Chandigarh1Guwahati1Raipur1Rajkot1SC1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 118Section 1478Section 13(3)4Section 1514Section 104Section 2344Section 1394Exemption4Addition to Income4Section 13(1)(c)

INSTITUTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ITI JHALAWAR ,JHALAWAR vs. ITO WARD JHALAWAR, JHALAWAR

The appeals of the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 39/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 May 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT
Section 10Section 144Section 147Section 151Section 234

ba) by the Legislature for denying benefit of section 11\n& 12 in case return is not filed in time as per provision of section 139 (4A).\nWe are also not in agreement with the contention of the Ld. DR that this\namendment is clarificatory in nature. As rightly pointed out by the Ld. Counsel\nthat this amendment has been

3
Disallowance2
Limitation/Time-bar2

INSTITUTE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ITI JHALAWAR,JHALAWAR vs. ITO WARD JHALAWAR, JHALAWAR

The appeals of the assessee are hereby allowed

ITA 41/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 May 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT
Section 10Section 144Section 147Section 151Section 234

ba) by the Legislature for denying benefit of section 11\n& 12 in case return is not filed in time as per provision of section 139 (4A).\nWe are also not in agreement with the contention of the Ld. DR that this\namendment is clarificatory in nature. As rightly pointed out by the Ld. Counsel\nthat this amendment has been

GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. DCIT-CIRCLE-EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA no

ITA 296/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri S.L. Poddar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Anup Singh, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 11Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)

section 12AA of the IT Act, 1961 vide letter No. CIT/Recovery/S. 12A(a)/23/5/2000-2001/459 dated 22.05.2005 issued by CIT, Jaipur. The object of the society/trust is to establish educational institution, Social, Economic & Educational Development of Backward Classes, Women Empowerment etc. It is observed from the assessment order that during the year under consideration salary to two more member

MOTHERS EDUCATION HUB,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 618/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & HON’BLE SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra, Addl.CIT
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 4Section 40A(2)(b)Section 68

12A-13A, wherein the assessee had filed justification for the payment of salary which is reproduced at para 4.2 of the assessment order. Therefore, in such a situation, the AO without specifying as to how the salary so paid is unreasonable or excessive had made disallowance, which according to us is against the spirit of provision of section

SHRI NAMDEV SAMAJ TANK SHASTRIYA VIKAS SAMITI AND SHODH SANSTHAN,NEW HOUSING BOARD KISHANGARH vs. ITO EXEMPTION, JAIPUR ROAD AJMER

In the result, the appeal of the assesee is allowed

ITA 776/JPR/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Apr 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), DR MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri C.M. Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Anoop Singh, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 80G

disallowing the exemption u/s 11 of the Act as the return was filed within the time allowed u/s 139(4) of the act.’’ 2.1 Apropos Ground No. 1 & 2 of the assessee, the facts as emerges from the order of the ld. CIT(A) dismissing the appeal of the assessee at para 4 to 6 of his order as under