BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

49 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai587Bangalore524Delhi488Chennai232Pune158Kolkata131Hyderabad109Ahmedabad108Karnataka58Jaipur49Chandigarh48Cochin29Visakhapatnam28Rajkot22Surat21Indore17Telangana13Lucknow11Guwahati10Amritsar9Cuttack6Jodhpur5Dehradun5Raipur3Panaji2Nagpur2Varanasi2SC2Kerala1Calcutta1Ranchi1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 12A56Section 80I32Addition to Income31Section 153A30Section 1128Section 10A27Section 143(3)25Deduction22Exemption21Disallowance

SHIV KUMAR SUSHIL KUMAR TEA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,KOTA vs. ACIT, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 100/JPR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Jul 2018AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri B.L. Bhojwani (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Seema Meena (JCIT)
Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(3)Section 44ASection 80ASection 80I

disallowed U/s 80IA of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) has dealt the issue by holding as under: “I have gone through assessee’s submission and AO’s findings. ITA 100/JP/2017_ M/s Shiv Kumar 4 Sushil Kumar Tea Enterprises P Ltd. Vs. ACIT From a perusal of the documents available on record it is seen that the appellant

Showing 1–20 of 49 · Page 1 of 3

20
Section 143(1)14
Section 14714

THIKARIYA GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LTD ,THIKARIYA vs. AO CPCITO WARD SIKAR, SIKAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 772/JPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Mar 2024AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Shri Shrawan Kumar Gupta AdvocateFor Respondent: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 143(1)Section 234ASection 80P

10A, 80-IA, 80-IAB, 80-IB, 80-IC, 80-ID or 80-IE of the Act, and Section 143(1)(a)(v) was only post- amendment that was made available on the statute vide the Finance Act, 2021 w.e.f. 01.04.2021 been made compatible, and in fact workable, to facilitate a disallowance

KATRATHAL GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED ,KATRATHAL vs. ITO WARD 1 SIKAR, SIKAR

ITA 1001/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Oct 2025AY 2019-20
For Appellant: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Gupta, Adv.\rFor Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, Addl. CIT\r
Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 144BSection 147Section 147rSection 148Section 148ASection 151Section 234ASection 250

disallow\r\nany deduction claimed by the assessee under Chapter VIA in a case return of\r\nincome is furnished by him beyond the “due date” specified in sub-section (1) of\r\nSection 139 of the Act was made available only vide the Finance Act, 2021,\r\nw.e.f. 01.04.2021 i.e. from A.Y.2021-22 onwards. On the basis of the aforesaid

ISYS SOFTECH PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ITO, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 81/JPR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 Nov 2017AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri G.M. Mehta (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri P.P. Meena
Section 10ASection 195Section 40Section 9(1)(vi)

disallowance of Rs. 3,06,563/- under section 10A of IT Act for the bank interest from the deposits out of business

RITESH KUMAR GARG,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WD 4(2), JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 261/JPR/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 Sept 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: The Ld. Cit (A). The Ld. Cit

For Appellant: Shri Vivek BhargavaFor Respondent: Ms Monisha Choudhary (JCIT)
Section 250Section 90

section 90 read with Rule 128(9) is a procedural law and should not control the claim of FTC. 6 Shri Ritesh Kumar Garg, Jaipur. It is further submitted that even in the context of 32AB, 80HHC(4), 80-IA(7), 10A(5) etc, wherein there is specific provision for disallowance

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. GOENKA JEWELLERS, JAIPUR

In the result, Ground No. 2 raised by the revenue is also dismissed

ITA 402/JPR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Aug 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalito, Ward 2(1), Jaipur ...... Appellant

For Appellant: Mr. Nishit Gandhi, Adv. (thro. VH), Ld. ARFor Respondent: Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT, Ld. DR
Section 10ASection 127Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 72Section 74

disallowing deduction claimed u/s. 10AA the CIT (A) allowed claimed deduction u/s. 10AA which appeal orders for Α.Υ. 2010-11 & 2011-12 have also been confirmed by Hon'ble ITAT dismissing the appeal filed by department. The appeal for A.Y. 2012-13 filed by department before ITAT has also been heard in last days and order is awaited

MOTHERS EDUCATION HUB,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 618/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & HON’BLE SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra, Addl.CIT
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 4Section 40A(2)(b)Section 68

disallowance of 50% of the salary is unjustified and not as per law.” 5.2 Moreover, the ld. CIT (A) in his finding has contradicted with the finding of the AO wherein he has mentioned that the assessee has not filed any evidence to show that actual services rendered by these persons, but at the same time ld. CIT (A) stated

SANJEEV AGRAWAL,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 71/JPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 May 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rohan Sogani (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, (Addl.CIT)
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 4Section 5Section 6Section 90

disallowed if the assessee does not file Form 67 within the due dates prescribed under Section 139(1) of the ITA. It is submitted that there are many sections in the ITA which specifically denied deduction or exemption or relief in case the return is not filed within the prescribed time frame. Attention is drawn toward Section 80AC, Section 80IA

GANPATI GEMS & JEWELLERS,JAIPUR vs. ASSTT./DY. CIT, CIRCLE 6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 36/JPR/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 May 2025AY 2017-2018
For Appellant: Shri G. M. Mehta, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Swapnil Parihar, JCIT-DR
Section 10ASection 10A(5)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 37(1)

disallowed\nthe exemption in view of section 10A(5) for not furnishing the said certificate\nalong with the return of income

ACIT, SIKAR vs. SIKAR KENDRIYA SAHKARI BANK LTD., SIKAR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 171/JPR/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2019AY 2007-08
For Appellant: Shri Anil Kaushik (CA)For Respondent: Shri Raj Mehra (Addl.CIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowed deduction u/s 80P in respect of interest received on loans / advances given to the employees, interest received from non SLR investments and Income received by way of service charges. However even in respect of such income deduction u/s 80P was allowed by 1st appellate authority in appeal no. 28/WR/08-09 vide order dated 21.08.2008. The only income on which deduction

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 68/JPR/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

For Appellant: Shri Shyam Lal Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Ms Manisha Chandra, CIT fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2(15)

10A, we are of the considered opinion that it will be open for the department while making assessment to follow provision of section 11(5) and section 13 to disallow

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 66/JPR/2022[2005]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Jun 2022

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

For Appellant: Shri Shyam Lal Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Ms Manisha Chandra, CIT fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2(15)

10A, we are of the considered opinion that it will be open for the department while making assessment to follow provision of section 11(5) and section 13 to disallow

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION),WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 67/JPR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

For Appellant: Shri Shyam Lal Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Ms Manisha Chandra, CIT fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2(15)

10A, we are of the considered opinion that it will be open for the department while making assessment to follow provision of section 11(5) and section 13 to disallow

SH. DHEERAJ SINGH SISODIYA,KOTA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA, KOTA

In the result the ground no

ITA 932/JPR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.931 to 936/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2014-15 to 2018-19 Dheeraj Singh Sisodiya 005, (Nayagaun) Ram Ganmandi, Kota बनाम DCIT, Vill. Beedmandi Vs. Central Circle, Kota स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: APAPS 6392 E अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Sh. P. C. Parwal, CA राजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by : Mrs. Alka Gautam,

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 139Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69

disallowance of section 10A benefit claimed in the covering letter of the return filed u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. It is also

SH. DHEERAJ SINGH SISODIYA,KOTA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA, KOTA

In the result the ground no

ITA 933/JPR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 139Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69

disallowance of section 10A benefit claimed in the covering letter of the return filed u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. It is also

SH. DHEERAJ SINGH SISODIYA,KOTA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA, KOTA

In the result the ground no

ITA 931/JPR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jan 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.931 to 936/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2012-13 & 2014-15 to 2018-19 Dheeraj Singh Sisodiya 005, (Nayagaun) Ram Ganmandi, Kota बनाम DCIT, Vill. Beedmandi Vs. Central Circle, Kota स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: APAPS 6392 E अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Sh. P. C. Parwal, CA राजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by : Mrs. Alka Gautam,

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 139Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69

disallowance of section 10A benefit claimed in the covering letter of the return filed u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. It is also

SH. DHEERAJ SINGH SISODIYA,KOTA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA, KOTA

In the result the ground no

ITA 935/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 139Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69

disallowance of section 10A benefit claimed in the covering letter of the return filed u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. It is also

SH. DHEERAJ SINGH SISODIYA,KOTA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA, KOTA

In the result the ground no

ITA 934/JPR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 139Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69

disallowance of section 10A benefit claimed in the covering letter of the return filed u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. It is also

SH. DHEERAJ SINGH SISODIYA,KOTA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA, KOTA

In the result the ground no

ITA 936/JPR/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Alka Gautam, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 139Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 69

disallowance of section 10A benefit claimed in the covering letter of the return filed u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. It is also

DATA INFOSYS LIMITED,ALWAR vs. DCIT, ALWAR

In the result, revenue’s ground no

ITA 58/JPR/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur09 May 2017AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri R.A.Verma (Addl. CIT)
Section 10ASection 35D

disallowance of Rs 15,37,860 made by the AO under section 10A of the Act. Briefly, the facts of the case