DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), and the provisions of Section 150 of the Act.\nThe assessee, while supporting the ultimate relief granted, is aggrieved\nby the directions given by the Id. CIT(A) in his order suggesting the AO\ninitiate proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

35-40), issued by the Central\nBoard of Direct Taxes “CBDT” on 23.08.2023, is an internal administrative\ndirective intended solely for operational guidance of Assessing Officers. It\nattempts to clarify the post-Abhisar Buildwell (supra) reassessment landscape,\nspecifically in situations where additions under Section 153A/153C were struck\ndown due to absence of incriminating material.\n\n2.4.ii.\nHowever, such administrative instructions

SM WORKFORCE PRIVATE LIMITED,BHIWADI vs. ITO, WARD, BHIWADI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

depreciation). Each of these deductions, has its contours, depending upon the expressions used, and the conditions that are to be met. It is therefore necessary to bear in mind that specific enumeration of deductions, dependent upon fulfillment of particular conditions, would qualify as allowable deductions: failure by the assessee to comply with those conditions, would render the claim vulnerable

KANHAIYALAL RAMESHWAR DAS,KOTA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR

35 Taxmann.com 594 (Nagpur – Trib) held as under:\n\"search assessments made under section 153A cannot be treated as\ncontinuance of normal assessment proceedings whether abated or not and,\ntherefore, it will not be justified to refer to returned income under section 139 for\npurpose of imposition of penalty under section 271 (1) (c).....\n.....where returned income filed under

TELECRATS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), JAIPUR , JAIPUR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

depreciation). Each of these deductions, has its contours, depending upon the expressions used, and the conditions that are to be met. It is therefore necessary to bear in mind that specific enumeration of deductions, dependent upon fulfillment of particular conditions, would qualify as allowable deductions: failure by the assessee to comply with those conditions, would render the claim vulnerable

TELECRATS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

depreciation). Each of these deductions, has its contours, depending upon the expressions used, and the conditions that are to be met. It is therefore necessary to bear in mind that specific enumeration of deductions, dependent upon fulfillment of particular conditions, would qualify as allowable deductions: failure by the assessee to comply with those conditions, would render the claim vulnerable

TAB INDIA GRANITES PRIVATE LIMITED ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

depreciation). Each of these deductions, has its contours, depending upon the expressions used, and the conditions that are to be met. It is therefore necessary to bear in mind that specific enumeration of deductions, dependent upon fulfillment of particular conditions, would qualify as allowable deductions: failure by the assessee to comply with those conditions, would render the claim vulnerable

BAJRANG WIRE PRODUCTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,BAJRANG WIRE PRODUCTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED vs. DCIT CIRCLE -4-JAIPUR, RJN-C-(104)(1), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI GAGAN GOYAL (Accountant Member)

Section 11(1) and 11(2) of the Act and the alleged ground of non-filing of the audit report alongwith return of income which was at the best a procedural omission, could never to an impediment in law in claiming the exemption. 6.2 Accordingly, the substantial questions of law have to be decided in favor of the appellant