M/S. MAHARAJA SHREE UMAID MILLS LTD. JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

section 32 read with the rules, it is clear that an undertaking engaged in generation or generation & distribution of power has an option to claim the depreciation either u/s 32(1)(i) or 32(1)(ii

OCEAN EXIM INDIA PRIVATE LTD,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(2), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

32- 37, on the other hand, deal primarily with business, commercial or professional expenditure, under various heads (including depreciation). Each of these deductions, has its contours, depending upon the expressions used, and the conditions that are to be met. It is therefore necessary to bear in mind that specific enumeration of deductions, dependent upon fulfilment of particular conditions, would qualify

M/S. MAHARAJA SHREE UMAID MILLS LTD. JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR

In the result, the ground of appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

depreciation claim pertains to plant & machinery installed and put to use in AY 2014-15, therefore, same is not allowable in current AY 2015-16. Section 32(1)(ii

SANJIV PRAKASHAN,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR

ii) an incorrect claim, if such incorrect claim is apparent from any information in the return; (iii) disallowance of loss claimed, if return of the previous year forwhich set off of loss is claimed was furnished beyond the due date specified under sub-section (1) of section 139; (iv) disallowance of expenditure [or increase in income] indicated in the audit

COMPUCOM SOFTWARE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-VI, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is disposed off in light of aforesaid directions

depreciation under section 32(1)(ii) and additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) of the Act during the course

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n“2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the prayers, we\nare of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in the form of\nreview which requires detail consideration at length looking into the\nimportance of the matter. Therefore

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n“2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the prayers, we\nare of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in the form of\nreview which requires detail consideration at length looking into the\nimportance of the matter. Therefore

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n“2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the prayers, we\nare of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in the form of\nreview which requires detail consideration at length looking into the\nimportance of the matter. Therefore

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n“2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the prayers, we\nare of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in the form of\nreview which requires detail consideration at length looking into the\nimportance of the matter. Therefore

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n“2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the prayers, we\nare of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in the form of\nreview which requires detail consideration at length looking into the\nimportance of the matter. Therefore

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n“2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the prayers, we\nare of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in the form of\nreview which requires detail consideration at length looking into the\nimportance of the matter. Therefore

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n“2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the prayers, we\nare of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in the form of\nreview which requires detail consideration at length looking into the\nimportance of the matter. Therefore

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n“2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the prayers, we\nare of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in the form of\nreview which requires detail consideration at length looking into the\nimportance of the matter. Therefore

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n“2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the prayers, we\nare of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in the form of\nreview which requires detail consideration at length looking into the\nimportance of the matter. Therefore

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n“2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the prayers, we\nare of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in the form of\nreview which requires detail consideration at length looking into the\nimportance of the matter. Therefore

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n“2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the prayers, we\nare of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in the form of\nreview which requires detail consideration at length looking into the\nimportance of the matter. Therefore

RAMESH CHAND BANSAL,BEAWAR vs. DCIT, AJMER

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

depreciation and the Assessing Officer did not honour the agreement. 3.1.2. After the coming of Sec. 271AAA applicability of Sec. 271(1)(c) has been completely ruled out by Sec. 271AAA(3). Moreover, the provisions of Sec. 271AAA starts with a non-obstante clause and overrides all other provisions of the Income Tax Act which essentially includes Sec. 271(1

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

32-34) dismissed\nthe Revenue's Misc. Application by observing as under:\n\n\"2. Having gone through the averments made in the application and the\nprayers, we are of the opinion that the prayers sought can be said to be in\nthe form of review which requires detail consideration at length looking\ninto the importance of the matter. Therefore