BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 268Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Cochin29Ahmedabad17Delhi13Mumbai9Karnataka7Jaipur3Chennai2Amritsar1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 406Depreciation3Addition to Income3

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTA vs. SHIV EDIBLES LTD., KOTA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 338/JPR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Aug 2018AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya (Adv)For Respondent: Shri Roshanta Meena (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 40

depreciation on electric installation. (ii) The appellant craves liberty to raise additional ground and to modify/amend the ground of appeal at the time of hearing.” 2. At the time of hearing, the ld. AR of the assessee has raised an objection of maintainability of the appeals of the Revenue for both the assessment years due to the tax effect

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTA vs. SHIV EDIBLES LTD., KOTA

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 339/JPR/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur
28 Aug 2018
AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya (Adv)For Respondent: Shri Roshanta Meena (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 40

depreciation on electric installation. (ii) The appellant craves liberty to raise additional ground and to modify/amend the ground of appeal at the time of hearing.” 2. At the time of hearing, the ld. AR of the assessee has raised an objection of maintainability of the appeals of the Revenue for both the assessment years due to the tax effect

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, ALWAR vs. SHRI SUBHASH CHAND GUPTA, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeal of the Revenue and the C

ITA 559/JPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Aug 2018AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri S. L. Poddar (Adv.)For Respondent: Shri J. S. Kulhari (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 40

depreciation claimed for more than 180 days for Rs. 3,75,000/- 3. That under the facts and circumstances of the case the learned CIT(A) has erred confirming the disallowance of Rs. 67,000/- on account of mining labour expenses without considering the submission of the assessee. 4. The assessee craves your indulgence to add amend or alter