DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

251 reads as follows :\nPowers of the [Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the] Commissioner\n(Appeals).\n251. (1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

251 reads as follows :\nPowers of the [Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the] Commissioner\n(Appeals).\n251. (1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a) in an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

251 reads as follows :\nPowers of the [Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the] Commissioner\n(Appeals).\n251. (1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

251 reads as follows :\nPowers of the [Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the] Commissioner\n(Appeals).\n251. (1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

251 reads as follows :\nPowers of the [Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the] Commissioner\n(Appeals).\n251. (1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

251 reads as follows :\n70\nPowers of the [Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the] Commissioner\n(Appeals).\n251. (1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

251 reads as follows :\nPowers of the [Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the] Commissioner\n(Appeals).\n251. (1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

251 reads as follows :\nPowers of the [Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the] Commissioner\n(Appeals).\n251. (1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

251 reads as follows :\nPowers of the [Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the] Commissioner\n(Appeals).\n251. (1) In disposing of an appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) shall have the\nfollowing powers—\n(a)\nin an appeal against an order of assessment, he may confirm, reduce,\nenhance or annul the assessment:\n[Provided that where such appeal is against an order

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. KARNANI SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

2, Madhab\nKisto Sett Lane, Kolkata, 700007. In this regard certificate issued by land lord\nShri Santosh Kumar Soni (CIT(A) PBP-101-102) and bill of Rent (CIT(A)\nPBP-99-100) issued to lender company by land lord is enclosed.\n\n(iv) The existence of said place is further evident from copy of bill issued for\nelectricity

DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR, NCRB, JAIPUR vs. BARMER LIGNITE MINING COMPANY LIMITED, UDYOG BHAWAN, JAIPUR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes in view of our detailed order (supra)

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

depreciation is admissible under section 32, Shall not be deemed to be expenditure incurred by the assessee for any of the purposes specified in sub-section (2). (4) The deduction to be allowed under sub-section (1) for any relevant previous year shall be— (a) an amount equal to one-tenth of the expenditure specified in sub-section (2) (such

BARMER LIGNITE MINING CO. LTD.,C-SCHEME, JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes in view of our detailed order (supra)

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

depreciation is admissible under section 32, Shall not be deemed to be expenditure incurred by the assessee for any of the purposes specified in sub-section (2). (4) The deduction to be allowed under sub-section (1) for any relevant previous year shall be— (a) an amount equal to one-tenth of the expenditure specified in sub-section (2) (such

DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR, NCRB, JAIPUR vs. BARMER LIGNITE MINING COMPANY LIMITED, UDYOG BHAWAN, JAIPUR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes in view of our detailed order (supra)

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

depreciation is admissible under section 32, Shall not be deemed to be expenditure incurred by the assessee for any of the purposes specified in sub-section (2). (4) The deduction to be allowed under sub-section (1) for any relevant previous year shall be— (a) an amount equal to one-tenth of the expenditure specified in sub-section (2) (such

BARMER LIGNITE MINING CO. LTD.,C-SCHEME, JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes in view of our detailed order (supra)

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

depreciation is admissible under section 32, Shall not be deemed to be expenditure incurred by the assessee for any of the purposes specified in sub-section (2). (4) The deduction to be allowed under sub-section (1) for any relevant previous year shall be— (a) an amount equal to one-tenth of the expenditure specified in sub-section (2) (such

DCIT, CIRCLE 6, JAIPUR, NCRB, JPR vs. BARMER LIGNITE MINING COMPANY LIMITED, UDYOG BHAWAN JAIPUR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes in view of our detailed order (supra)

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

depreciation is admissible under section 32, Shall not be deemed to be expenditure incurred by the assessee for any of the purposes specified in sub-section (2). (4) The deduction to be allowed under sub-section (1) for any relevant previous year shall be— (a) an amount equal to one-tenth of the expenditure specified in sub-section (2) (such

DCIT, CIRCLE-6 JAIPUR, NCRB, JAIPUR vs. BARMER LIGNITE MINING COMPANY LIMITED, UDYOG BHAWAN, TILAK NAGAR JPR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes in view of our detailed order (supra)

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

depreciation is admissible under section 32, Shall not be deemed to be expenditure incurred by the assessee for any of the purposes specified in sub-section (2). (4) The deduction to be allowed under sub-section (1) for any relevant previous year shall be— (a) an amount equal to one-tenth of the expenditure specified in sub-section (2) (such

BARMER LIGNITE MINING CO. LTD.,C-SCHEME, JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes in view of our detailed order (supra)

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

depreciation is admissible under section 32, Shall not be deemed to be expenditure incurred by the assessee for any of the purposes specified in sub-section (2). (4) The deduction to be allowed under sub-section (1) for any relevant previous year shall be— (a) an amount equal to one-tenth of the expenditure specified in sub-section (2) (such

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BANGUR NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AJMER

In the result, the appeal of the assessee - appellant in ITA No

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

depreciation on said rights. Hon'ble ITAT has referred that facts are similar to the facts for AY 2015-16 and the issue has been decided in favour of assessee in the very same order. It is pertinent to mention here this issue for AY 2015-16 was decided in view of the fact that identical issue has already been