Search: depreciation

5 results for “depreciation”+ Section 245Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai58 Delhi48 Indore8 Jaipur5 Visakhapatnam5 Chennai5 Guwahati3 SC3 Karnataka3 Lucknow2 Telangana2 Varanasi2 Bangalore1 Raipur1 Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)18 Section 271A6 Section 1274 Penalty4 Section 12A3 Section 103 Section 153A3 Section 142(1)3 Section 245D(4)2 Addition to Income

INDIAN MEDICAL TRUST,JAIPUR vs. DY. CIT, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and that of the\nrevenue are dismissed

ITA 685/JPR/2023[A.Y. 2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur10 Apr 2024

For Appellant: Shri G.M. Mehta, CAFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR

Section 10Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 245D(4)

245D(4) of Act on 30.06.2017. For the year in appeal, as against nil taxable\nincome, the income assessed by ld. AO was Rs.26,28,95,700/- for the reason that ld. AO did not\nallow depreciation of Rs.16,66,58,482, educational expenses of Rs.2,64,16,748/- incurred on\npractical training to the students of BJMC (Bachelor degree

INDIAN MEDICAL TRUST,JAIPUR vs. DY. CIT, JAIPUR

INDIAN MEDICAL TRUST,JAIPUR vs. DY. CIT, JAIPUR

MANGI LAL KANDOI ,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – 2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

MANGI LAL KANDOI ,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – 2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

MANGI LAL KANDOI ,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – 2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

MANGI LAL KANDOI ,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE – 2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR