BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

51 results for “depreciation”+ Section 153C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai262Delhi177Bangalore153Jaipur51Chennai40Cochin37Hyderabad36Pune31Ahmedabad28Visakhapatnam22Kolkata19Guwahati16Karnataka15Chandigarh9Cuttack6Lucknow5Dehradun5Kerala5Raipur3Nagpur2Indore2Rajkot2Calcutta1Rajasthan1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 153A74Section 143(3)32Addition to Income32Section 14717Section 6913Section 14812Disallowance12Section 143(2)10Section 12A10Section 68

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. VIMAL CHAND SURANA HUF, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 437/JPR/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur17 May 2018AY 2007-08
For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma &For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 131Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 292C

153C r.w.s. 153A and the provisions of section 147/148 of the Act ITA 437/JP/2017_ 37 DCIT Vs. Vimal Chand Surana (HUF) are not applicable in such cases. No contrary decision has been brought to our notice. Accordingly, we hold that initiation of proceedings u/s 147/148 by the AO to reassess the income is illegal being without jurisdiction and consequently

Showing 1–20 of 51 · Page 1 of 3

10
Unexplained Investment10
Deduction8

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 293/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 299/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 288/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 300/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 302/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 296/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 292/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 298/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 295/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 289/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 290/JPR/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Jun 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh proceedings

RAMESH CHAND BANSAL,BEAWAR vs. DCIT, AJMER

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 398/JPR/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 Jun 2018AY 2007-08
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Seema Meena, JCIT - DR
Section 132(4)Section 133ASection 139Section 153ASection 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

depreciation and the Assessing Officer did not honour the agreement. 3.1.2. After the coming of Sec. 271AAA applicability of Sec. 271(1)(c) has been completely ruled out by Sec. 271AAA(3). Moreover, the provisions of Sec. 271AAA starts with a non-obstante clause and overrides all other provisions of the Income Tax Act which essentially includes Sec. 271(1

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 297/JPR/2025[2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025

153C, in the absence of\nincriminating material found during the search, in respect of such income\nwhich was found to have escaped assessment other than through\nincriminating material, the assessing officers would be entitled to\nreassess such income in terms of Section 147/148 read with section 150.\n\n(iii) That the Assessing Officer, may if found necessary initiate fresh

DCIT, CC-2, JAIPUR vs. SHRI VIMAL CHAND SURANA(HUF), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

ITA 62/JPR/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur06 Mar 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma (CA) &For Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra (Addl.CIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 139Section 143Section 147Section 150(2)Section 153CSection 2Section 250Section 69

153C r.w.s. 153A and the provisions of section 147/148 of the Act are not applicable in such cases. No contrary decision has been brought to our notice. Accordingly, we hold that initiation of proceedings u/s 147/148 by the AO to reassess the income is illegal being without jurisdiction and consequently the reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s

SHRI MADHO LAL SAINI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(3), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 238/JPR/2020[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur06 Mar 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Shri S. Najmi (CIT)
Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 250Section 54BSection 54FSection 69

153C r.w.s. 153A and the provisions of section 147/148 of the Act are not applicable in such cases. No contrary decision has been brought to our notice. Accordingly, we hold that initiation of proceedings u/s 147/148 by the AO to reassess the income is illegal being without jurisdiction and Shri Madho Lal Saini and Others. consequently the reassessment order passed

RSD CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD 7(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1320/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur06 Aug 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Khandelwal, C.AFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT, Sr.-DR
Section 115BSection 147Section 148Section 149Section 151Section 151ASection 153CSection 68

153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which has over riding effect over provisions of section 147/148. 2. That the whole proceedings undertaken u/s 147/148 are vitiated on account of following reasons:- a. Notice has been issued without jurisdiction and proper sanction. Notice is not as per provisions of law as amended w.e.f. 01.04.2021. Further the new notice dated

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. SAPNA KARNANI, TONK PHATAK

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 712/JPR/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Oct 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Deepak Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam, CIT, DR
Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68Section 69C

153C is misconceived and under incorrect assumption of finding\nof Hon'ble Court.\n2.18 Covered issue: The issue of assessee is squarely covered by the decision\nof Hon'ble Bench in the case of DCIT Vs Vaibhav Banka in ITA No.310/JP/2025\nvide order dated 08.07.2025 holding as under:\n\"We also take note of the facts that CBDT's Instructions

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. SAPNA KARNANI, TONK PHATAK

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 709/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Oct 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Deepak Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam, CIT, DR
Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 153CSection 68Section 69C

153C of the Act. Hon'ble Court\nat 50, Para-40, merely stated as under:\n\"40. In view of above discussion the notices issued under Section 148 and the\nimpugned orders are quashed. However, the respondents shall be at liberty to\nproceed against the petitioners in accordance with law.”\nIn view of the above finding, the observation of Ld.CIT

LOVELY PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AJMER, AJMER

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 770/JPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Feb 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: him regarding non mentioning of Document Identification Number (DIN) in the body of the order u/s. 127 of the Act dated 08-09-2021 and various other technical pleas raised in grounds of appeal regarding validity of notice u/s. 148 of the Act, thereby appellate order passed by the CIT(A) is non-speaking order and deserves to be quashed. 4. On the facts and in circumstances of the case and in law, the AO erred in issuing notice u/s. 148 of the Act as it was a search related case u/s. 132 r/w

For Appellant: Shri Mayank Taparia (Adv.)For Respondent: Shri A.S. Nehra (Addl.CIT) a
Section 127Section 127(1)Section 132Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 153C

153C or 153A. This is not done in the present case.It is not a case of reassessment of escaped income but to tap undisclosed income in a search related case, S. 148 has no jurisdiction. The Appellant is a person related to search. The issue of Notice u/s. 148 is not tenable as it is a search related case