Search: depreciation

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai189 Delhi44 Chandigarh44 Ahmedabad27 Bangalore21 Kolkata20 Hyderabad18 Chennai9 Surat5 Jaipur3 Karnataka2 Kerala1 Indore1 Cochin1 Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)10 Section 1544 Addition to Income3 Section 43B2 Section 139(1)2 Section 143(1)(a)2 Section 36(1)(va)2 Section 2(24)(x)2 Disallowance2

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1-1, KOTA vs. SHRI CHANDI RAM, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 662/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Siddharth Ranka (Adv.) &For Respondent: Smt Runi Pal (Addl. CIT)

Section 143(3)

145A(b) of the Act. In the instant case of the assessee, he has received interest of Rs.1,39,44,881/- an arbitration receipts of Rs 58,46,714/- & security refunds of Rs 3,62,059/- during the year under consideration is legally treated as income of the assessee for the same year- 9.4 In the original

OM INFRA LIMITED,JAIPUR RAJASTHAN vs. ADIT (CPC) BANGALORE, BENGALURU KARNATAKA

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 534/JPR/2023[2019-20]Status: Disposed

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1-1, KOTA vs. SHRI CHANDI RAM, KOTA

OM INFRA LIMITED,JAIPUR RAJASTHAN vs. ADIT (CPC) BANGALORE, BENGALURU KARNATAKA

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1-1, KOTA vs. SHRI CHANDI RAM, KOTA

OM INFRA LIMITED,JAIPUR RAJASTHAN vs. ADIT (CPC) BANGALORE, BENGALURU KARNATAKA

OM INFRA LIMITED,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. ADIT (CPC) BANGALORE, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA