PRINCESS INFRA & DEVELOPMENT LLP,KOTA vs. ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE-KOTA , KOTA

In the result, both the appeals of the assesseeare allowed for statistical purposes as indicate hereinabove

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

144 of the Act. hence the aforesaid proviso of section 251(1)(a) of the Act is applicable in the instant case also. We are enclosing herewith an order passed by a CIT(Appeals), NFACfollowingthe similar provision It is therefore, most humbly requested to kindly set aside the assessment order dated 27.12.2019 and refer the case Back to assessing officer

DEEP JYOTI COMPANY,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Hearing Of This Appeal.”

Depreciation 2186308 4892558 6975264 Interest Paid to Party 4207010 6108173 7767083 Remuneration paid to Partners 1500000 1800000 1800000 Total 24894003 25848141 43084570 5 Deep Jyoti Company, Jaipur. Less: FDR Interest & Other 2081275 5669942 8362256 Income Adjusted Profit 22812728 20178199 34722314 Total Turnover 307983890 258056977 434372451 Net profit furnished by A/R vide 7.99 7.40 7.81 letter dated

M/S KANAK VRINDAVAN RESORTS LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

Depreciation 11,86,847/- 5,00,000/- Total 30,47,505/- 12,00,000/- In this regard it is submitted that it is settled provision of law that no disallowance can be made on estimate basis without rejecting the books of accounts u/s 145(3) of the Act. However, in the instant case ld. AO concluded the assessment by making

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR RAJASTHAN vs. NAVRATAN VIDHA MANDIR SHIKSHA SAMITI, JAIPUR RAJASTHAN

In the result appeal filed by the Department is dismissed and the C

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Section 144. 9.3 Thus in the present case, it is seen that the books of account were not produced before the A.O along with the bills and vouchers for expenses. 28 ACIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-JAIPUR VS NAVRATAN VIDHA MANDIR SHIKSHA SAMITI Accordingly, the A.O was unable to verify the same. Hence there was reason for the A.O to exercise

SHRI DIGAMBER JAIN ATIKSHAYA KESHTRA,PADAMPUA vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD 1, KAILASH HEIGHTS

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

144 of the I.T. Act, 1961. Notices under section 142(1) of the IT. Act, 1961 alongwith query letter were issued. In response thereto, Shri Narendra Kumar Goswami, Advocate and Authorized Representative of the society attended the proceeding from time to time and furnished the requisite details/submission. The case discussed with him." Hence, there is no merit in the same

RSD CONTAINERS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD 7(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

144 r.w.s 144B of the Income 2 RSD Containers Pvt Ltd. vs ITO Tax Act, 1961 [ for short “Act”] which was passed by the Assessment Unit of Income Tax Department [ for short AO]. 2. In this appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds: - “1. That the whole proceedings u/s 147/148 are liable to be held as null and void

SUNRISE REALCONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED ,ALWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHIWADI, BHIWADI

In the result, the both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

144, was also appropriate due to the lack of response from the assessee. The notices during assessment were sent to the appellant on email address ashishsogani.ca@gmail.com which is Last Used E-Mail ID by current user. This is the same address on which appeal notices are been sent along with CC to sunrisebhiwadi@gmail.com and the Sunrise Real Consultancy

KAILASH CHAND,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD, BEHROR, BEHROR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Judicial Member)

section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Ld. AO noted that the assessee has not furnished return of income in compliance of notice issued u/s 148 of the I.T. Act, 1961. Ample opportunities were provided to the assessee, but no details/documents have been furnished till the date of completion of the assessment u/s. 144

SUNRISE REALCONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED ,BHIWADI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-BHIWADI, BHIWADI

144, was also appropriate\ndue to the lack of response from the assessee. The notices during assessment\nwere sent to the appellant on email address ashishsogani.ca@gmail.com which is\nLast Used E-Mail ID by current user. This is the same address on which appeal\nnotices are been sent along with CC to sunrisebhiwadi@gmail.com and the\nappeal notices have been replied

J.S.FOURWHEEL MOTORS (P) LTD ,ALWAR vs. ACIT. CIRCLE 1 ALWAR, ALWAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whereas the assessee company has submitted all the desired information, details and evidences through online mode, before framing of the assessment order and lying on the assessment record, which have partly been considered on pick and choose basis and additions so made are just on the presumption, assumption and surmises

DINESSH KUMAR SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD4(2), JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

depreciation allowance or any other allowance, as the\ncase may be, for the assessment year concerned (hereafter in this section and in sections 148 to\n153 referred to as the relevant assessment year).\n\n5\n\nITA No. 1393/JPR/2024\nShri Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Jaipur.\n\n2.2 The expression 'believe" in section 147 requires an objective satisfaction based on definite\nmaterial

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BANGUR NAGAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AJMER

In the result, the appeal of the assessee - appellant in ITA No

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

sections (4) to (10) and as increased by the applicable surcharge, for the purposes of the Union, calculated in the manner provided therein, shall be further increased by an additional surcharge, for the purposes of the Union, to be called the “Health and Education Cess on income-tax”, calculated at the rate of four per cent of such income

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

Section 147/148 of the Act. The assessee\ntherefore before us by preferring the present Cross-Objection to challenge\nthe directions and to raise other legal and factual grounds in support of the\ndeletion of the addition. Record reveals that Id. CIT(A) vide page 36 while\ndealing with the appeal of the assessee has issued direction

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back to the Assessing Officer for making a fresh\nassessment;]\n(aa) in an appeal against the order of assessment in respect of which the\nproceeding before the Settlement Commission abates under section\n245HA, he may, after taking into consideration all the material and\nother information produced

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back to the Assessing Officer for making a fresh\nassessment;]\n(aa) in an appeal against the order of assessment in respect of which the\nproceeding before the Settlement Commission abates under section\n245HA, he may, after taking into consideration all the material and\nother information produced

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back to the Assessing Officer for making a fresh\nassessment;]\n(aa)\nin an appeal against the order of assessment in respect of which the\nproceeding before the Settlement Commission abates under section\n245HA, he may, after taking into consideration all the material and\nother information produced

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back to the Assessing Officer for making a fresh\nassessment;]\n(aa) in an appeal against the order of assessment in respect of which the\nproceeding before the Settlement Commission abates under section\n245HA, he may, after taking into consideration all the material and\nother information produced

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back to the Assessing Officer for making a fresh\nassessment;]\n(aa)\nin an appeal against the order of assessment in respect of which the\nproceeding before the Settlement Commission abates under section\n245HA, he may, after taking into consideration all the material and\nother information produced

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

144, he may set aside the assessment and refer\nthe case back to the Assessing Officer for making a fresh\nassessment;]\n(aa)\nin an appeal against the order of assessment in respect of which the\nproceeding before the Settlement Commission abates under section\n245HA, he may, after taking into consideration all the material and\nother information produced