DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. KARNANI SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of Prem\nKunj Commosales P Ltd for AY 2014-15 dated\n07.12.2016\n146-\n152\n25. Copy of assessment order u/s 143(3) of\nPanchkoti Wholeseller P Ltd for AY 2014-15 dated\n13.12.2016\n153-\n159\n26. Copy of assessment order u/s 143(3) of Night\nBird Barter P Ltd for AY 2014-15 dated\n21.11.2016\n160-\n165

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN COOPERATIVE DAIRY FEDERATION LTD, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

2(24)(x) - unless the conditions spelt by Explanation to Section 36(1)(va) are satisfied i.e., depositing such amount received or deducted from the employee on or before the due date. In other words, there is a marked distinction between the nature and character of the two amounts – the employer’s liability is to be paid

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN COOPERATIVE DAIRY FEDERATION LTD, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

2(24)(x) - unless the conditions spelt by Explanation to Section 36(1)(va) are satisfied i.e., depositing such amount received or deducted from the employee on or before the due date. In other words, there is a marked distinction between the nature and character of the two amounts – the employer’s liability is to be paid

DCIT, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN COOPERATIVE DAIRY FEDERATION LTD, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

2(24)(x) - unless the conditions spelt by Explanation to Section 36(1)(va) are satisfied i.e., depositing such amount received or deducted from the employee on or before the due date. In other words, there is a marked distinction between the nature and character of the two amounts – the employer’s liability is to be paid

SAROJ DEVI HALDIYA,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD-6(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

depreciation allowance or any other allowance, as the case may be, for the\n assessment year concerned (hereafter in this section and in sections 148 to 153 referred to\nas the relevant assessment year) :\nProvided that where an assessment under sub-section (3) of section 143 or this section\nhas been made for the relevant assessment year, no action shall

SANJIV PRAKASHAN,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

2(24)((x), the adjustments\nmade in this case are in the nature of 'increase in income'. The right to\nmake adjustments u/s 143(1)(a)(iv) for ‘increase in income' has been\nconferred only w.e.f. 1.4.2021 i.e. AY 2021-22. Thus, invoking this\nclause for making adjustment in the returned income is without\njurisdiction.\n7. It is further submitted

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of\nthe Act, 1961 and to reassess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income\neven found during the search and seizure operation.\n15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed\nincome is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO\nwould assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of\nthe Act, 1961 and to reassess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income\neven found during the search and seizure operation.\n15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed\nincome is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO\nwould assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of\nthe Act, 1961 and to reassess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income\neven found during the search and seizure operation.\n15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed\nincome is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO\nwould assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of\nthe Act, 1961 and to reassess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income\neven found during the search and seizure operation.\n15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed\nincome is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO\nwould assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of\nthe Act, 1961 and to reassess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income\neven found during the search and seizure operation.\n15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed\nincome is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO\nwould assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of\nthe Act, 1961 and to reassess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income\neven found during the search and seizure operation.\n15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed\nincome is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO\nwould assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of\nthe Act, 1961 and to reassess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income\neven found during the search and seizure operation.\n15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed\nincome is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO\nwould assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of\nthe Act, 1961 and to reassess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income\neven found during the search and seizure operation.\n15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed\nincome is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO\nwould assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of\nthe Act, 1961 and to reassess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income\neven found during the search and seizure operation.\n15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed\nincome is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO\nwould assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of\nthe Act, 1961 and to reassess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income\neven found during the search and seizure operation.\n15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed\nincome is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO\nwould assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

143(3) of\nthe Act, 1961 and to reassess the total income taking notice of undisclosed income\neven found during the search and seizure operation.\n15.1 In view of the discussion hereinabove, once during search undisclosed\nincome is found on unearthing the incriminating material during the search, the AO\nwould assume jurisdiction to assess or reassess the total income even

JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal in ITA no

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

143(3) (all w.r.e.f. 1-4-2009), reaffirm this interpretation and bring uniformity across the statutory provisions. 5.1.6 All the facts and circumstances related to the impugned action of Ld. AO in disallowing exemption u/s 11 are duly considered. There is substantial force in the contention made by the Ld. A.O. It is observed, the appellant was engaged

JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal in ITA no

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;djvihy la-@ITA No. 665 & 666/JPR/2023 fu/kZkj.ko"kZ@Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2013-14 Jodhpur Development Authority 1, Opposite Railway Hospital, JDA Circle, Jodhpur. cuke Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption, Jodhpur. LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAALJ 0478 P vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Amit Kothari (C.A.) jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by:

143(3) (all w.r.e.f. 1-4-2009), reaffirm this interpretation and bring uniformity across the statutory provisions. 5.1.6 All the facts and circumstances related to the impugned action of Ld. AO in disallowing exemption u/s 11 are duly considered. There is substantial force in the contention made by the Ld. A.O. It is observed, the appellant was engaged