SANJIV PRAKASHAN,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

142 wherein the co-\nordinate bench has based its decision on the interpretation and binding\ndecision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court. In the case of\nKalpesh Synthetics Pvt Ltd [supra], the Tribunal has held that the CPC\nBengaluru cannot override the binding decision of the Hon'ble Bombay\nHigh Court while making the impugned disallowance on account

KATRATHAL GRAM SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED ,KATRATHAL vs. ITO WARD 1 SIKAR, SIKAR

142(1) or section 148 can also be accepted and acted\r\nupon for entertaining claim raised under section 80P provided further\r\nproceedings in relation to such assessments are pending in statutory hierarchy\r\nof adjudication in terms of provisions of Act. In the case of ASR Engg. &\r\nProjects Ltd. [2019] 111 taxmann.com 49 (Hyderabad- Trib.), the ITAT

RAWAT BAL VIDHA NIKETAN SAMITTEE,JAIPUR vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), JAIPUR

142(1) of the Act was called for vide questionnaire\nthrough ITBA. Incompliance of the said notices, the assessee submitted details /\ninformation through e-proceedings and the information so filed by the assessee was\nexamined by the AO. The AO while assessment proceedings noted that the\nassessee trust is engaged in education Sector wherein the following institutions are\nrun

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held that

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

142 against the appellant for the assessment\nyears 1968-69 to 1971-72 and 1981-82 are hereby quashed. The appeal stands\nallowed with costs.\n\nThe above view is also get support by a decision of Nagpur Bench of this\nITAT in the case of M B Traders Vs. ACIT [ 132 TTJ 490 ] wherein the co-\nordinate bench held

BAJRANG WIRE PRODUCTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,BAJRANG WIRE PRODUCTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED vs. DCIT CIRCLE -4-JAIPUR, RJN-C-(104)(1), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI GAGAN GOYAL (Accountant Member)

142. This revised return can be filed at any time before expiry of one year from the end of the relevant assessment year or before the completion of assessment, whichever is earlier. The ld. A/R further contended that the assessee complied with the provisions of section 80AC of the IT Act by filing its original return on 25.10.2018 which

RAJESH MOTORS (CARS) PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO WD 5(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the above mentioned assessee's are dismissed

142 wherein the co-ordinate bench has based\nits decision on the interpretation and binding decision of the Hon'ble\nJurisdictional High Court. In the case of Kalpesh Synthetics Pvt Ltd\n[supra], the Tribunal has held that the CPC Bengaluru cannot override the\nbinding decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court while making the\nimpugned disallowance on account

SM WORKFORCE PRIVATE LIMITED,BHIWADI vs. ITO, WARD, BHIWADI

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

142 wherein the co-ordinate bench has based its decision on the interpretation and binding decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court. In the case of Kalpesh Synthetics Pvt Ltd [supra], the Tribunal has held that the CPC Bengaluru cannot override the binding decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court while making the impugned disallowance on account

TELECRATS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all the three appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

142 wherein the co-ordinate bench has based its decision on the interpretation and binding decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court. In the case of Kalpesh Synthetics Pvt Ltd [supra], the Tribunal has held that the CPC Bengaluru cannot override the binding decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court while making the impugned disallowance on account