INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION),WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

13(8) of the Act nothing contained in section 11 or Section 12 shall operate, so as to exclude of income of total income of previous year of the present. As we have held that in the light of the various judicial pronouncement proviso to clause (15) to Section 2 of the Act would not be applicable on the facts

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

13(8) of the Act nothing contained in section 11 or Section 12 shall operate, so as to exclude of income of total income of previous year of the present. As we have held that in the light of the various judicial pronouncement proviso to clause (15) to Section 2 of the Act would not be applicable on the facts

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

13(8) of the Act nothing contained in section 11 or Section 12 shall operate, so as to exclude of income of total income of previous year of the present. As we have held that in the light of the various judicial pronouncement proviso to clause (15) to Section 2 of the Act would not be applicable on the facts

OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION) WARD-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), DR MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

13 under which income of a charitable or religious institution is computed, allowance of depreciation under section 32(1) would mean double deduction, which is not permissible in view of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Escorts Ltd. v. Union of India [1993] 199 ITR 43/[1992] 65 Taxman 420. The depreciation being notional expenditure will

GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. DCIT-CIRCLE-EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the revenue in ITA no

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

section 13(1)(c) rw.s 13(2)(b)(g) of the Income-tax Act. -Funds were not used for the trust. 10 GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY, JAIPUR VS DCIT-CIRCLE (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR Therefore, decision of Id. CIT(A) is not acceptable. Besides, departmental appeal is pending before Hon ble high court on the similar issue

M/S WHOLESALE CLOTH MERCHANT,KOTA vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 688/Jp/2019 Assessment Year: ………………………… M/S Wholesale Cloth Merchant Cuke Pr.C.I.T. (Central), Vs. Association, Jaipur (Rajasthan) New Cloth Market, Kota. Pan No.: Aaatw 0127 C Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Siddarth Ranka & Shri Shravan Kr. Gupta (Advs) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri Ambrish Bedi (Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 14/10/2020 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 06/01/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Pr.Cit(Central), Rajasthan, Jaipur Dated 22/03/2019 Passed U/S 12Aa(3) & 12Aa(4) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act). Following Grounds Have Been Taken By The Assessee: “1. That In The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld Pr. Cit(Central), Rajasthan, Jaipur Has Grossly Erred In Cancelling The Registration Of The Assessee Appellant Trust Under Section 12A Of The Act By Invoking Section 12Aa(4) Of The Act W.E.F. 01/04/2013. 2. The Appellant Craves Leave To Add, Alter, Modify Or Amend Any Ground On Or Before The Date Of Hearing.”

2 of 2014 whereby section 11 (6) was inserted so as to exclude such assets while computing depreciation in respect of which deduction has been allowed as an application of income u/s 11. In view of the above, we hold that AO was not justified in denying the benefit of the exemption u/s 11 of the Act and we direct

SHRI KALYAN BUILDMART PVT. LTD,JAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

13-18]. 1.5. On the basis of details submitted by the assessee company in response to exhaustive queries raised by ld. AO, share premium received was found by the ld. AO to be genuine, fully justified and in accordance with the law. Accordingly, returned income was accepted and no addition was made u/s 56(2)(viib). 2. SUBMISSIONS 2.1. Before

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR vs. M/S APOLLO ANIMAL MEDICAL GROUP TRUST, JAIPUR

In the result, the grounds of appeal taken by the Revenue are dismissed

depreciation of Rs. 52,88,222/-) net surplus of Rs. 1,58,99,324/- was claimed as exempt under section 11 and transferred to the corpus fund of the trust in Balance sheet. During the year 4,51,17,188/- on purchase of land and Rs. 45,66,860/- on other assets purchased was stated to be spent on capital

JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal in ITA no

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

13,925 Miscellaneous Expenses 39,69,24,407 Depreciation during the year 2,26,84,619 Total Expenditure - II 119,66,97,589 Net Surplus / (Deficit) (-) 8,59,90,118 2.5. Similarly the appellant also submitted the audited financial statements for AY 2013-14, in which also there was deficit of (-) Rs. 303,290,726/-, which is also annexed

JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal in ITA no

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;djvihy la-@ITA No. 665 & 666/JPR/2023 fu/kZkj.ko"kZ@Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2013-14 Jodhpur Development Authority 1, Opposite Railway Hospital, JDA Circle, Jodhpur. cuke Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption, Jodhpur. LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAALJ 0478 P vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Amit Kothari (C.A.) jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by:

13,925 Miscellaneous Expenses 39,69,24,407 Depreciation during the year 2,26,84,619 Total Expenditure - II 119,66,97,589 Net Surplus / (Deficit) (-) 8,59,90,118 2.5. Similarly the appellant also submitted the audited financial statements for AY 2013-14, in which also there was deficit of (-) Rs. 303,290,726/-, which is also annexed

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

13 of the paper book filed by the learned counsel which is quoted below for\nbetter appraisal of facts :\n\"Assessee filed the return of income of Rs.39,720 on 25th Jan., 1993.\nAssessment under s.143(3) was completed on a total income of Rs.15,55,579 on\n29th March, 1996 making addition of Rs.15,15,859.\nThe order under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

13 of the paper book filed by the learned counsel which is quoted below for\nbetter appraisal of facts :\n\"Assessee filed the return of income of Rs.39,720 on 25th Jan., 1993.\nAssessment under s.143(3) was completed on a total income of Rs.15,55,579 on\n29th March, 1996 making addition of Rs.15,15,859.\nThe order under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

13 of the paper book filed by the learned counsel which is quoted below for\nbetter appraisal of facts :\n\"Assessee filed the return of income of Rs.39,720 on 25th Jan., 1993.\nAssessment under s.143(3) was completed on a total income of Rs.15,55,579 on\n29th March, 1996 making addition of Rs.15,15,859.\nThe order under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

13 of the paper book filed by the learned counsel which is quoted below for\nbetter appraisal of facts :\n\"Assessee filed the return of income of Rs.39,720 on 25th Jan., 1993.\nAssessment under s.143(3) was completed on a total income of Rs.15,55,579 on\n29th March, 1996 making addition of Rs.15,15,859.\nThe order under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

13 of the paper book filed by the learned counsel which is quoted below for\nbetter appraisal of facts :\n"Assessee filed the return of income of Rs.39,720 on 25th Jan., 1993.\nAssessment under s.143(3) was completed on a total income of Rs.15,55,579 on\n29th March, 1996 making addition of Rs.15,15,859.\nThe order under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

13 of the paper book filed by the learned counsel which is quoted below for\nbetter appraisal of facts :\n\"Assessee filed the return of income of Rs.39,720 on 25th Jan., 1993.\nAssessment under s.143(3) was completed on a total income of Rs.15,55,579 on\n29th March, 1996 making addition of Rs.15,15,859.\nThe order under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

13 of the paper book filed by the learned counsel which is quoted below for\nbetter appraisal of facts :\n\"Assessee filed the return of income of Rs.39,720 on 25th Jan., 1993.\nAssessment under s.143(3) was completed on a total income of Rs.15,55,579 on\n29th March, 1996 making addition of Rs.15,15,859.\nThe order under

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

13 of the paper book filed by the learned counsel which is quoted below for\nbetter appraisal of facts :\n\"Assessee filed the return of income of Rs.39,720 on 25th Jan., 1993.\nAssessment under s.143(3) was completed on a total income of Rs.15,55,579 on\n29th March, 1996 making addition of Rs.15,15,859.\nThe order under