BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

200 results for “condonation of delay”+ TDSclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai996Pune711Mumbai650Patna614Delhi601Bangalore491Hyderabad368Kolkata293Nagpur262Raipur212Cochin209Jaipur200Chandigarh160Ahmedabad145Visakhapatnam116Cuttack103Lucknow73Surat63Karnataka54Indore52Rajkot35Amritsar34Dehradun25Jodhpur24Kerala23Allahabad19Guwahati18Panaji16Agra15Ranchi11Jabalpur10Varanasi9SC7Telangana2Rajasthan1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)120TDS82Section 271C77Section 20175Condonation of Delay57Addition to Income40Penalty27Section 194C23Section 143(3)22

RAM BHAROSE SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for Statistical purposes as indicated above

ITA 1066/JPR/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Jun 2018AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Seema Meena, JCIT - DR
Section 143(3)Section 156Section 234B

condonation of delay and the relevant assessment record. It may be mentioned that the assessment order along with notice of demand and penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act was received by Sh. Vipin Singhal, the earlier AR of the appellant on 04.03.2014. An application u/s 154 of the Act was filed

LALITA DEVI SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-7(1), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 200 · Page 1 of 10

...
Limitation/Time-bar20
Deduction20
Section 234E18
ITA 1410/JPR/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Apr 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No. 1410/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2020-21 Lalita Devi Sharma Murlidhar Sharma Dhani Vs. Harsaura, Baskhoh, Jaipur Baskho, Jaipur अपीलार्थी / Appellant बनाम स्थायी लेखा सं. / जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: HCPPS 0547 Q प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by: Sh. Rajendra Sisodia, CA राजस्व की ओर से / Revenue by : Mrs. Swapnil Parihar, JCIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hear

For Appellant: Sh. Rajendra Sisodia, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Swapnil Parihar, JCIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

TDS, as it was her first year of audit u/s 44AB. The assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A) which was delayed. However, the assessee filed the reasons for the delay in filing the appeal. The Ld.CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine holding - There exists no sufficient or good reason for condoning

DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 1466/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 May 2019AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Sogani (CA)For Respondent: Shri Ashok Khanna (JCIT)
Section 201(1)

condonation of delay. We had also carefully gone through the evidences placed on record for the efforts done by the assessee for furnishing requires returns which includes the internal communication of the assessee to the senior employees for submitting PAN details, intimation by the Income tax Department for deputing personnel for verification of TDS

DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 1464/JPR/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Feb 2019AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Shri B.K. Gupta (CIT-DR)
Section 201(1)Section 206A

condonation of delay. We had also carefully gone through the evidences placed on record for the efforts done by the assessee for furnishing requires returns which includes the internal communication of the assessee to the senior employees for submitting PAN details, intimation by the Income tax Department for deputing personnel for verification of TDS

DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), JAIPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 1467/JPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Feb 2019AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Shri B.K. Gupta (CIT-DR)
Section 201(1)Section 206A

condonation of delay. We had also carefully gone through the evidences placed on record for the efforts done by the assessee for furnishing requires returns which includes the internal communication of the assessee to the senior employees for submitting PAN details, intimation by the Income tax Department for deputing personnel for verification of TDS

AO (SC), AVVNL, SIKAR,SIKAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1349/JPR/2018[2013-14 , 24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Feb 2022
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Salgia (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (JCIT)
Section 1Section 200ASection 234Section 234ESection 250

TDS) ‘’Limitation – Condonation of delay – ‘’Sufficient cause’’ for not preferring appeal or making application with prescribed period – where delay is only

BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ADDL.CIT(TDS), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 643/JPR/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Or At The Time Of Appellate Hearing.”

For Appellant: Sh. Shailesh Mantri, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS has provided the certified copies of these order on 06/04/2024. Thereafter the appeal documents had been prepared and the appeal has been submitted before your goodself within 60 days of the receipts of the true certified copy of the orders. It is therefore requested kindly condone the said delay

BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ITO TDS-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 642/JPR/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Or At The Time Of Appellate Hearing.”

For Appellant: Sh. Shailesh Mantri, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS has provided the certified copies of these order on 06/04/2024. Thereafter the appeal documents had been prepared and the appeal has been submitted before your goodself within 60 days of the receipts of the true certified copy of the orders. It is therefore requested kindly condone the said delay

BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ITO TDS-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 641/JPR/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Or At The Time Of Appellate Hearing.”

For Appellant: Sh. Shailesh Mantri, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS has provided the certified copies of these order on 06/04/2024. Thereafter the appeal documents had been prepared and the appeal has been submitted before your goodself within 60 days of the receipts of the true certified copy of the orders. It is therefore requested kindly condone the said delay

BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ITO TDS-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 639/JPR/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Jul 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Or At The Time Of Appellate Hearing.”

For Appellant: Sh. Shailesh Mantri, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS has provided the certified copies of these order on 06/04/2024. Thereafter the appeal documents had been prepared and the appeal has been submitted before your goodself within 60 days of the receipts of the true certified copy of the orders. It is therefore requested kindly condone the said delay

BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ADDL.CIT(TDS), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 640/JPR/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Or At The Time Of Appellate Hearing.”

For Appellant: Sh. Shailesh Mantri, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

TDS has provided the certified copies of these order on 06/04/2024. Thereafter the appeal documents had been prepared and the appeal has been submitted before your goodself within 60 days of the receipts of the true certified copy of the orders. It is therefore requested kindly condone the said delay

PRAKASH SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ALWAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 184/JPR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Jun 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI MANISH BORAD (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. S.L. Poddar (Adv.)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Chaudhary (Addl.CIT)
Section 144Section 147Section 148

condonation of delay is a significant and relevant fact (vi) It is to be kept in mind that adherence to strict proof should not affect public justice and cause public mischief because the courts are required to be vigilant so that in the ultimate eventuate there is no real failure of justice. (vii) The concept of liberal approach

SUB TREASURY OFFICER,ASIND , BHILWARA vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1003/JPR/2019[2016-17 (24Q-4qQtr)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Jun 2021
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Salagia (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl.CIT)

TDS) there were delay of 3 days in filing these appeals. The ld AR also filed applications for condoning the delay

SUB TREASURY OFFICER,ASIND , BHILWARA vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1006/JPR/2019[2018-19 (24Q-4TH QTR.)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Jun 2021
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Salagia (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl.CIT)

TDS) there were delay of 3 days in filing these appeals. The ld AR also filed applications for condoning the delay

SUB TREASURY OFFICER,ASIND , BHILWARA vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1005/JPR/2019[2018-19 (24Q-3rd Qtr.)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Jun 2021
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Salagia (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl.CIT)

TDS) there were delay of 3 days in filing these appeals. The ld AR also filed applications for condoning the delay

SUB TREASURY OFFICER,ASIND , BHILWARA vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1004/JPR/2019[2017-18 (24Q-4TH QTR.)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Jun 2021
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Salagia (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl.CIT)

TDS) there were delay of 3 days in filing these appeals. The ld AR also filed applications for condoning the delay

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, NEEM KA THANA,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1119/JPR/2019[2013-14-24Q-2]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

condone delay has result in a meritorious matter being thrown out at the very threshold and cause of justice being defeated. 4. The Tax was deducted & Deposited in time, the only default is delay in filing of the return ,the alleged delay in filing the TDS

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, NEEM KA THANA,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1121/JPR/2019[2013-14- 24Q-4]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

condone delay has result in a meritorious matter being thrown out at the very threshold and cause of justice being defeated. 4. The Tax was deducted & Deposited in time, the only default is delay in filing of the return ,the alleged delay in filing the TDS

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, NEEM KA THANA,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1120/JPR/2019[2013-14-Q-3]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

condone delay has result in a meritorious matter being thrown out at the very threshold and cause of justice being defeated. 4. The Tax was deducted & Deposited in time, the only default is delay in filing of the return ,the alleged delay in filing the TDS

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, KANWAT ,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1110/JPR/2019[2016-17 (24Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

condone delay has result in a meritorious matter being thrown out at the very threshold and cause of justice being defeated. 4. The Tax was deducted & Deposited in time, the only default is delay in filing of the return ,the alleged delay in filing the TDS