SYAANI LEGAL HEIR LATE NARAYAN JAT,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 7(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

delay is condoned. 3.1 Apropos ground of appeal, it is noticed that the ld CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee by observing at para 6 & 7 of his order as under:- “6. Decision In all the grounds of appeal, the appellant has challenged the addition made by the Assessing Officer. However, he did not produce any submission

KULDEEP SINGH SHEKHAWAT,KOTA vs. ITO W-2(1), KOTA, KOTA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Gagan Goyalkuldeep Singh Shekhawat, 11, Samridhi Traders, Police Line, Gopal Vihar, Baran Road-324001 Pan No. Araps0973M ...... Appellant Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Kota …... Respondent

condone the delay of 292 days in filing of appeal. 5. It is observed that during the year under consideration the assessee sold property situated at Village Deoli Arab Road, Tehsil Ladpura, and Kota for Rs. 3.08 Cr. Which was jointly owned by the assessee himself and some Mr. Naveen Kumar in 50:50, meaning thereby the share

SMT CHATRU BAI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, KOTA

delay in filing the appeal by the assessee is condoned. 3.1 Apropos Ground No. 1.1, 1.2 and 2 of the assessee, the facts as emerges from the order of the ld. CIT(A) are as under:- ‘’5.32.The assessee challenged reopening of the assessment u/s 148 on the ground that no notice was served on the assessee and that notices were

SMT. GEETA DEVI,AJMER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, AJMER

delay is condoned and appeal is being heard on merit. 3. In this appeal, the assessee is aggrieved for decline of claim of exemption U/s 54F of the Act. At the outset, the ld AR of the assessee placed on the record the order of the Coordinate Bench in the case of co-owner Shri Mohandas Kurani

OMPRAKASH,DHOLPUR vs. ITO WARD 4 BHARATPUR, BHARATPUR

In the result, the both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical\npurposes as indicated hereinabove\nOrder pronounced in the open court on\n17/01/2025

Condon the delay in filling of appeal due to non-receipts of assessment order in\ntime and time taken in obtaining copy of Sale Deed from Purchaser & the Humble Appellant is\nsenior Citizen aged 70 Years.\nThat the Learned Assessing Officer grossly eared in initiating the Penalty proceedings u/s\n271(1)(c) of the Act.\nThat

SHRI HARI RAM YADAV,ALWAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALWAR

section 143(3) by the Assessing officer pertaining to Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. At the outset, the ld. AR submitted that the present appeal has been filed by the assessee with a delay of 10 days and an application 2 Shri Hari Ram Yadav vs. Pr.CIT has been filed with a request to condone the said delay