Search: condonation of delay

14 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Pune28 Karnataka21 Delhi20 Jaipur14 Kolkata14 Ahmedabad11 Mumbai11 Bangalore9 Hyderabad7 Chennai6 Cochin6 Visakhapatnam5 Indore4 Chandigarh4 Rajkot4 Amritsar2 Surat2 Guwahati1 SC1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 26313 Section 143(3)13 Limitation/Time-bar13 Condonation of Delay13 Section 271D4

HARISH JAIN,KOTA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

In the result appeal of the assessee in the ITA No

ITA 214/JPR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

For Appellant: ShriMahendraGargieya (Adv.)&For Respondent: ShriJames Kurian (CIT)

Section 143(3)Section 263

delay of 6days in filing the appeal by the assessee is condoned in ITA No. 217 to 223/JP/2022, 214 to 2016/JP/2022 &ITA No. 281 to 283/JP/2022. 7. Before moving towards the facts of the case we would like to mention that the assessee has assailed the appeal in ITA No. 217/JPR/2022 on the following grounds

HARISH JAIN,JAIPUR vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

In the result appeal of the assessee in the ITA No

ITA 215/JPR/2022[2015-16]Status: Disposed

HARISH JAIN,KOTA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

HARISH JAIN,JAIPUR vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

HARISH JAIN,KOTA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

HARISH JAIN,JAIPUR vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

HARISH JAIN,KOTA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

RAM KISHAN VERMA,KOTA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

RAM KISHAN VERMA,KOTA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

RAM KISHAN VERMA,KOTA vs. PCIT (CIRCLE), JAIPUR

RAM KISHAN VERMA,KOTA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

RAM KISHAN VERMA,KOTA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

RAM KISHAN VERMA,KOTA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

RAM KISHAN VERMA,KOTA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), JAIPUR

MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), JAIPUR

MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), JAIPUR

SMT. MEERA DEVI KUMAWAT,JAIPUR vs. JCIT, RANGE-4, , JAIPUR