BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata32Mumbai29Chennai24Delhi23Hyderabad5Bangalore4Patna4Lucknow3Visakhapatnam2Allahabad2Indore2Jaipur2Rajkot2Surat2Varanasi2Ahmedabad2Amritsar1Raipur1Karnataka1Jabalpur1Cochin1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 26310Section 1483Section 194J2Condonation of Delay2

SHIV VEGPRO PRIVATE LIMITED ,KOTA vs. PCIT-UDAIPUR , UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1014/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jan 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, (Adv.) &For Respondent: Mrs. Alka Gautam, (CIT-DR)
Section 147Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

condone the delay of 96\ndays in filing the appeals by the assessee in view of the decision of\nHon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Collector, land Acquisition\nvs. Mst. Katiji and Others, 167 ITR 471 (SC) as the assessee was\nprevented by sufficient cause.\n4. The fact as culled out from the records is that M/s Shiv

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD 4(3), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 36/JPR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Mar 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’ble SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri H.M. Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT-DR
Section 148Section 154Section 194J

194J whereas the AO ought to have estimated the income by applying the rate of should have considered by applying the rate @ 8% 2.1 During the course of hearing, the Bench noted that there is delay 18 days in filing the appeal by the assessee for which the ld. AR of the assessee filed an application for condonation of delay