BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

108 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)(vi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai217Pune186Delhi181Kolkata124Jaipur108Bangalore85Ahmedabad83Chennai80Surat39Lucknow30Hyderabad25Indore25Nagpur23Rajkot19Chandigarh13Agra11Cochin8Amritsar8Visakhapatnam7Karnataka7Raipur7Jodhpur6Panaji5Allahabad3Punjab & Haryana2Jabalpur2Telangana2Patna2SC1Calcutta1Varanasi1Rajasthan1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 12A520Section 80G312Exemption92Section 12A(1)(ac)49Section 80G(5)39Charitable Trust31Section 80G(5)(iii)27Natural Justice27Condonation of Delay

MANDIR SHREE BHAIRAV JI TRUST,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 427/JPR/2023[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur02 Nov 2023

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Vikash Rajvanshi (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

5). Ground No. 2 The assessee Trust had filed from 10A for provisional registration and the provisional registration was granted to the assessee in form 10AC on 26.11.2021, valid till AY 2024-25. A trust holding provisional registration is not liable to furnish replies to any notice issued, but still we had submitted our reply for notice dated 28.03.2023 vide

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Showing 1–20 of 108 · Page 1 of 6

19
Limitation/Time-bar16
Section 1015
Section 1114
ITA 696/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2024

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik (CIT)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ab)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iii)

charitable in nature and consequently, assessee was entitled to registration u/s 80G(5) and no merit in order of CIT(A) in this regard and reversing same, it held that renewal of registration u/s section 80G(5) was to be granted to assessee society. Shiv MandirDevsttanPanch Committee SansthanVs. CIT (2012) 79 DTR 276 (Nag.)(Trib.) In this case, assessee

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 695/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2024

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik (CIT)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ab)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iii)

charitable in nature and consequently, assessee was entitled to registration u/s 80G(5) and no merit in order of CIT(A) in this regard and reversing same, it held that renewal of registration u/s section 80G(5) was to be granted to assessee society. Shiv MandirDevsttanPanch Committee SansthanVs. CIT (2012) 79 DTR 276 (Nag.)(Trib.) In this case, assessee

ALL INDIA SECURITISATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ASSOCIATION,CHITRANJAN MARG vs. CIT EXEMPTION, KAILASH HEIGHT,

In the result, the both appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 627/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur04 Apr 2025

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vikash Rajvanshi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Meena, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G

5) of\nsec 80G of the Act is liable to be rejected as non-maintainable\n\n04. In view of above discussion applicant's application for\napproval u/s 80G is liable to be rejected and thus being rejected\non following grounds\n•\nApproval u/s 80G cannot be granted without registration u/s\n12AB\n•\nCommencement of activities\n\n5. Further 12AB

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPURTHE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

ITA 778/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Sept 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

5) of section 80G of the Act as within time and consider the same and pass orders thereon on merits 8. Therefore, owing to extenuating circumstances beyond our control, such as the registration of the Trust under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, as mandated by the honorable Supreme Court of India in the case of New Noble Educational Society

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

ITA 777/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Sept 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos.775 to 778/JP/2024 Uttrakhand Samaj 51/117 Sec 5, Pratap Nagar Sanganer, Jaipur cuke Vs. The CIT, Exemption Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAATU 6874 A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 20/08/2024 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@D

For Appellant: Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

5) of section 80G of the Act as within time and consider the same and pass orders thereon on merits 8. Therefore, owing to extenuating circumstances beyond our control, such as the registration of the Trust under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, as mandated by the honorable Supreme Court of India in the case of New Noble Educational Society

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

ITA 775/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Sept 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

5) of section 80G of the Act as within time and consider the same and pass orders thereon on merits 8. Therefore, owing to extenuating circumstances beyond our control, such as the registration of the Trust under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, as mandated by the honorable Supreme Court of India in the case of New Noble Educational Society

RAJ RISHI BHARTRIHARI MATSYA UNIVERSITY ALWAR,ALWAR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALWAR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed\nfor statistical purpose

ITA 568/JPR/2023[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 May 2024
For Appellant: Sh. R. S. PooniaFor Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 10Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C)\nof section 10 or section 11 or section 12 for any previous year ending on or\nbefore the date of such application, at any time after the commencement of such\nactivities:/"\n1. As per the New Scheme of approval u/s. 80G of the I.T. Act, 1961 any\ninstitution have to got approval

SUPREME BUILDESTATES PVT LTD,MADANGANJ- KISHANGARH vs. DCIT CIRCLE 2 AJMER, JAIPUR ROAD AJMER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 495/JPR/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Oct 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri C.M. Agarwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Anup Singh (Addl. CIT) a
Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 2Section 234BSection 37Section 80Section 80G

trust were considered eligible for deduction u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act by the assessee. As the deduction allowable to the assessee company u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act was computed at Rs 17,16,540/ and the same was claimed as deduction from the total income in accordance with the provisions of chapter VI of the Income

PARITRUPTI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT(E) JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 519/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur02 Jul 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Gorav Parasar, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12Section 12ASection 5Section 8Section 80GSection 80G(5)

80G allows deduction to an assessee in computing his total income in respect of donation paid to any fund or institution. However, under sub- section 5, the deduction is allowable only if such fund or institution is established in India for charitable purpose and it fulfills the following conditions:- (i) The income of the fund or institution is exempt

GO GRAM ECO FOUNDATION,GOVINDGARH TEHSIL CHOMU vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTIONS), JAIPUR

ITA 504/JPR/2023[Not Applicable]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Nov 2023

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (F.C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT) a
Section 10Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

Charitable Trust (supra). The concluding paragraph of the judgment is worth to note in this aspect, which read as under:- "Be that as it may, we are here concerned whether in the absence of any statutory provision to condone the delay in presenting the application under section 10(23C) (vi), the Chief Commissioner of Income-tax can exercise any such

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 776/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Sept 2024
For Appellant: Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is rejected as 'in limine'.\nHowever, the approval granted to the institution, if any, in Form No. 10AC will\ncontinue to exist till the expiry of the time period mentioned thereon unless\ncancelled separately as per law. Hence, the application of the applicant\ntrust/institution is rejected as withdrawn

RAM NIWAS MODI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are disposed off\nthereby allowing the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 118/JPR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 Nov 2025AY 2022-23
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, Ld. JCIT
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

80G(5) filed\nthrough FORM 10B but in the following words:\n“04. In view of above discussion assessee's claim of registration section 12AB is\nliable\nto be rejected and thus being rejected on following grounds:\n• Registration under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959.\n• Benefited to interested persons.\n8\nITA No. 118 & 779/JPR/2025\nRam Niwas Modi Charitable Society

BAREFOOT COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL,KISHANGARH vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed\nOrder pronounced in the open court on\n20/02/2024

ITA 596/JPR/2023[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 Feb 2024AY 2024-2025
For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 11(1)(c)Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

Charitable Company under section 8 of the\nCompanies Act, 2013 and also having approval u/s 12AB of the Income-tax Act for the period\nfrom AY 2022-23 to AY 2026-27. (Refer Paper Book No. 1, Page No. 28-30)\n2. That the company applied for provisional approval u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act,\n1961 on dated

ICON FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 159/JPR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 May 2025AY 2025-26
For Appellant: Shri Tarun Mittal, C.A
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable trust\nincorporated on 17.01.2023 and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust, 1959\non 06.05.2024. Assessee Trust is created for the purpose of providing essential\nhealthcare and physiotherapy services to children suffering from various\ndevelopmental disorders at large using the various scientific approaches without\nany discrimination of caste, creed or colour. The assessee trust is providing the\ntreatment to children

TREHAN SEVA BHARTI CHARITABLE TRUST,ALWAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1027/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 Jan 2025
Section 12(1)Section 12ASection 80G

80G.\n\n2. The Ld. CIT(E) has further erred on facts and in law in cancelling the\nprovisional approval granted by CIT under clause (iv) of first proviso to section\n80G(5) of IT Act, 1961.\n\n3. The appellant craves to alter, amend and modify any ground of appeal.\n\n4. Necessary cost be awarded to the assessee

ICON FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 158/JPR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 May 2025AY 2025-26
For Appellant: Shri Tarun Mittal, C.A
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable trust\nincorporated on 17.01.2023 and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust, 1959\non 06.05.2024. Assessee Trust is created for the purpose of providing essential\nhealthcare and physiotherapy services to children suffering from various\ndevelopmental disorders at large using the various scientific approaches without\nany discrimination of caste, creed or colour. The assessee trust is providing the\ntreatment to children

SHRI JAIN SHWETAMBER TERAPANTHI VIDYALAYA COMMITTEE,STATION ROAD, PURANI SADAK vs. CIT EXEMPTION, CIT EXEMPTION JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1000/JPR/2024[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 Feb 2025AY 2023-2024

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalshri Jain Shwetamber Terapanthi Vidyalaya Committee, Station Road Churu, Rajasthan - 331001 Pan No.:Aaots0584M ...... Appellant Vs. Cit Exemption, Jaipur, Kailash Height, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur ...... Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Rajesh Bhawsinghka, Adv., Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. Arvind Kumar, CIT, Ld. DR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

80G (5) This section applies to donations to any institution or fund referred to in sub-clause (iv) of clause (a) of sub-section (2), only if it is established in India for a charitable purpose and if it fulfils the following conditions, namely: — (i) where the institution or fund derives any income, such income would not be liable

DHYAN YOG GAU-SEVA SOCIETY,DELHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 708/JPR/2023[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur31 Jan 2024AY 2023-2024

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Anoop Bhatia, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Malik, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G

vi) and under clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5). It was granted provisional registration in Form No.10AC on 27.10.2021 from 27.10.2021 to A.Y. 2024-25. The assessee commenced its activities from 13.10.2021, i.e. from the date of its incorporation. Therefore, it filed an application in Form No.10AB both

M/S BALAJI CHARITABLE TRUST,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 39/JPR/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Mar 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhai, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 39/Jp/2021 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :...................... M/S Balaji Charitable Trust, Cuke Cit(Exemptions), Vs. 117, Industrial Area, Jhotwara, Jaipur Jaipur. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aaatb 2683 G Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Anant Kasliwal (Adv.) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Dhariwal (Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 07/03/2022 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 14/03/2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(Exemptions), Jaipur Dated 23/03/2021 Passed U/S 80G(5)(Vi) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act) Wherein Following Grounds Have Been Raised.

For Appellant: Shri Anant Kasliwal (Adv.)For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Dhariwal (CIT-DR)
Section 10GSection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

vi) of sub-section (5) of Section 80G is moved in Form 10G and accompanied by copy of registration granted U/s 12A/12AA or copy of notification issued in 10(23C). In this regard, the ld.AR has placed on record copy of registration certificate U/s 12AA of the Act granted in favour of M/s Balaji Charitable Trust