BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

112 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)(iv)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai255Pune160Chennai148Delhi141Kolkata113Ahmedabad113Jaipur112Bangalore78Surat41Hyderabad38Rajkot31Lucknow28Chandigarh26Indore23Nagpur20Amritsar13Visakhapatnam12Agra10Cuttack7Jodhpur5Jabalpur5Cochin5Raipur5Karnataka4Allahabad3Telangana3Panaji2Punjab & Haryana2SC1Dehradun1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 12A530Section 80G358Exemption94Section 12A(1)(ac)44Section 80G(5)32Charitable Trust30Section 1124Section 80G(5)(iii)24Natural Justice

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 695/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2024

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik (CIT)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ab)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iii)

80G(5)(iii) and (iv) application filed is not within the time limit and the provisional approval granted to the assessee was also cancelled. Submission:- 1. The Ld. CIT(E) in its order has observed that assessee has not furnished reply to the show cause notice dt. 18.03.2024(PB 104-106)by stating that reply filed on 22.03.2024 was only

Showing 1–20 of 112 · Page 1 of 6

21
Section 1018
Condonation of Delay18
Addition to Income15

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 696/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2024

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik (CIT)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ab)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iii)

80G(5)(iii) and (iv) application filed is not within the time limit and the provisional approval granted to the assessee was also cancelled. Submission:- 1. The Ld. CIT(E) in its order has observed that assessee has not furnished reply to the show cause notice dt. 18.03.2024(PB 104-106)by stating that reply filed on 22.03.2024 was only

MANDIR SHREE BHAIRAV JI TRUST,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 427/JPR/2023[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur02 Nov 2023

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Vikash Rajvanshi (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

Trust are not eligible u/s 80G(5) 2.1 The provision of section 80G(5) are as under: “80G(5) This section applies to donations to any institutions or fund referred to in sub clause (iv) of clause (a) of subsection (2), only if it is established in India for a charitable

ALL INDIA SECURITISATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ASSOCIATION,CHITRANJAN MARG vs. CIT EXEMPTION, KAILASH HEIGHT,

In the result, the both appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 627/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur04 Apr 2025

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vikash Rajvanshi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Meena, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G

iv) of clause (12) of sub-section(5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act valid from 06-10-\n2021 to AY 2024-25 vide PB No.130-132. The Trust had applied for permanent registration via form\n10AB on 29.09.2023 under section 80G sub section (5) of clause (iii) but was wrongly rejected by CIT(E)\nExemption.\n\nThe assessee

RAJ RISHI BHARTRIHARI MATSYA UNIVERSITY ALWAR,ALWAR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALWAR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed\nfor statistical purpose

ITA 568/JPR/2023[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 May 2024
For Appellant: Sh. R. S. PooniaFor Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 10Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

iv) of the\nfirst proviso to sub-section 5 of section 80G of the Act and therefore, the\napplicant / assessee was required to file application in Form no. 10AB u/s.\nclause (iii) of first proviso to subsection (5) of section 80G of the Act within\nthe time period of at least six months prior to expiry of period

SUPREME BUILDESTATES PVT LTD,MADANGANJ- KISHANGARH vs. DCIT CIRCLE 2 AJMER, JAIPUR ROAD AJMER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 495/JPR/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Oct 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri C.M. Agarwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Anup Singh (Addl. CIT) a
Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 2Section 234BSection 37Section 80Section 80G

Iv Obligations to incur expenditure on CSR activities flows from the Companies Act, and has no linkage what so ever with Section 80G of the Act except to the extent provided in clause (a)(iiihk) and (a) (iiihl) of Sub Section 2 to Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. 10 Supreme Buildestates Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT It is also

PARITRUPTI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT(E) JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 519/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur02 Jul 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Gorav Parasar, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12Section 12ASection 5Section 8Section 80GSection 80G(5)

80G allows deduction to an assessee in computing his total income in respect of donation paid to any fund or institution. However, under sub- section 5, the deduction is allowable only if such fund or institution is established in India for charitable purpose and it fulfills the following conditions:- (i) The income of the fund or institution is exempt

GO GRAM ECO FOUNDATION,GOVINDGARH TEHSIL CHOMU vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTIONS), JAIPUR

ITA 504/JPR/2023[Not Applicable]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Nov 2023

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (F.C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT) a
Section 10Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

80G allows deduction to an assessee in computing his total income in respect of donation paid to any fund or institution. However, under sub-section 5, the deduction is allowable only if such fund or institution is established in India for charitable purpose and it fulfills the following conditions:- (i) The income of the fund or institution is exempt

PARASMAL JAIN BILASPURIYA (BARJATYA) PARMARTHIK CHARITABLE TRUST (NYAS),TONK vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

ITA 780/JPR/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Anoop Bhatia, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar Bhardwaj-DR (V.C.)
Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

Charitable Trust At the same time, it was clarified in the impugned order that the provisional approval dated 02.10.2021 under clause (iv) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 80G

BAREFOOT COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL,KISHANGARH vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed\nOrder pronounced in the open court on\n20/02/2024

ITA 596/JPR/2023[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 Feb 2024AY 2024-2025
For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 11(1)(c)Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

Section 11 (4A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, specifies twin conditions regarding\nexemption of profits and gains of business for a Trust / Institution :\nMaintenance of separate books of accounts of business carried on by the assessee.\nii. Business activity should be incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the\ninstitution.\nBoth these conditions were duly fulfilled

RAM NIWAS MODI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are disposed off\nthereby allowing the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 118/JPR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 Nov 2025AY 2022-23
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, Ld. JCIT
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

Charitable Society, Kota.\napplication and also cancelling its earlier approval. Thus, it is clarified that\napplicant's provisional approval under clause (iv) of first proviso to sub-\nsection (5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 10.03.2022\nis also being cancelled. Further assessee has failed to give proper\njustification for regularization of provisional approval, thus with this

ICON FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 159/JPR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 May 2025AY 2025-26
For Appellant: Shri Tarun Mittal, C.A
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable trust\nincorporated on 17.01.2023 and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust, 1959\non 06.05.2024. Assessee Trust is created for the purpose of providing essential\nhealthcare and physiotherapy services to children suffering from various\ndevelopmental disorders at large using the various scientific approaches without\nany discrimination of caste, creed or colour. The assessee trust is providing the\ntreatment to children

ICON FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 158/JPR/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur13 May 2025AY 2025-26
For Appellant: Shri Tarun Mittal, C.A
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

charitable trust\nincorporated on 17.01.2023 and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust, 1959\non 06.05.2024. Assessee Trust is created for the purpose of providing essential\nhealthcare and physiotherapy services to children suffering from various\ndevelopmental disorders at large using the various scientific approaches without\nany discrimination of caste, creed or colour. The assessee trust is providing the\ntreatment to children

TREHAN SEVA BHARTI CHARITABLE TRUST,ALWAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1027/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur15 Jan 2025
Section 12(1)Section 12ASection 80G

80G.\n\n2. The Ld. CIT(E) has further erred on facts and in law in cancelling the\nprovisional approval granted by CIT under clause (iv) of first proviso to section\n80G(5) of IT Act, 1961.\n\n3. The appellant craves to alter, amend and modify any ground of appeal.\n\n4. Necessary cost be awarded to the assessee

SHRI JAIN SHWETAMBER TERAPANTHI VIDYALAYA COMMITTEE,STATION ROAD, PURANI SADAK vs. CIT EXEMPTION, CIT EXEMPTION JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1000/JPR/2024[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 Feb 2025AY 2023-2024

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalshri Jain Shwetamber Terapanthi Vidyalaya Committee, Station Road Churu, Rajasthan - 331001 Pan No.:Aaots0584M ...... Appellant Vs. Cit Exemption, Jaipur, Kailash Height, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur ...... Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Rajesh Bhawsinghka, Adv., Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. Arvind Kumar, CIT, Ld. DR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

80G (5) This section applies to donations to any institution or fund referred to in sub-clause (iv) of clause (a) of sub-section (2), only if it is established in India for a charitable purpose and if it fulfils the following conditions, namely: — (i) where the institution or fund derives any income, such income would not be liable

CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION TRUST,JAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

ITA 621/JPR/2023[2017-18 onwards]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur03 Jun 2024
For Appellant: Sh. Prakul Khurana, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik, CIT &
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 40A(3)

iv), (v), (vi), (via) of this clause\nand which have been approved or provisionally approved\nunder the second proviso to the said clause.\nThese amendments are effective from 1st April, 2022. In addition\nto the specified violations referred above, the power of\ncancellation has also been granted under sub-rule (5)\nof rule 17A and sub-rule (5) of rule

DHYAN YOG GAU-SEVA SOCIETY,DELHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 708/JPR/2023[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur31 Jan 2024AY 2023-2024

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Anoop Bhatia, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Malik, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G

80G allows deduction to an assessee in computing his total income in respect of donation paid to any fund or institution. However, under sub-section 5, the deduction is allowable only if such fund or institution is established in India for charitable purpose and it fulfills the following conditions:- (i) The income of the fund or institution is exempt

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR vs. M/S APOLLO ANIMAL MEDICAL GROUP TRUST, JAIPUR

In the result, the grounds of appeal taken by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 960/JPR/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jan 2021AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Sogani (C.A.) &For Respondent: Smt Runi Pal (Add.CIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

charitable trust running a veterinary college in the name of Apollo College of Veterinary Medicine. It is registered U/s 12AA vide order no. 29/8/2003-04/723 dated 27.06.2003. For the year under consideration, the assessee trust filed its return of income on 29.09.2008 declaring total income at Rs. NIL. The case of the assessee trust was selected for scrutiny and the assessment

GANGAUR EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. THE PCIT-2, JAIPUR

In the result grounds raised by the assessee are allowed and order of Ld

ITA 362/JPR/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sanjeev Kumar Mathur, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar (CIT)
Section 135Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37Section 5Section 80GSection 80I

charitable trust and claim deduction on the same. Thus, this aspect was not examined by the AO at all. In view of the same, the order of the AO is found to be erroneous and thus prejudicial to the interest of Revenue and based on that aspect of the matter he order as under : Accordingly, by virtue of powers conferred

KANCHAN DEVI BHAG CHAND JAIN FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 805/JPR/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Aug 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: Or At The Time Of Appellate Hearing.”

For Appellant: Shri Shailesh Mantri (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik (CIT) a
Section 12ASection 13(1)(b)Section 8Section 800(5)Section 80G

iv) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Facts of the Case:- 1. The assessee is a company incorporated under Section 8 of Companies Act 2013. The assessee is engaged in the charitable activities, it is doing various activities and also doing works for welfare of students and for benefit