BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

204 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai508Delhi399Ahmedabad334Pune303Chennai259Kolkata204Jaipur204Bangalore200Surat127Hyderabad73Rajkot60Lucknow49Chandigarh48Indore43Nagpur41Amritsar41Visakhapatnam34Cochin21Cuttack21Agra14Jodhpur14Raipur11Karnataka11Ranchi10Jabalpur10Panaji9Allahabad6Patna6Calcutta5Telangana4Punjab & Haryana2SC2Rajasthan2Dehradun2Varanasi1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 12A440Section 80G309Exemption94Section 80G(5)40Charitable Trust33Section 80G(5)(iii)32Section 1126Section 12A(1)(ac)25Condonation of Delay22

MANDIR SHREE BHAIRAV JI TRUST,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 427/JPR/2023[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur02 Nov 2023

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Vikash Rajvanshi (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

Trust are not eligible u/s 80G(5) 2.1 The provision of section 80G(5) are as under: “80G(5) This section applies to donations to any institutions or fund referred to in sub clause (iv) of clause (a) of subsection (2), only if it is established in India for a charitable

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Showing 1–20 of 204 · Page 1 of 11

...
Limitation/Time-bar21
Natural Justice21
Section 1015
ITA 695/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2024

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik (CIT)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ab)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iii)

trust was constituted long back on 27-8-1963 and has been carrying on such charitable activities, this Court finds no justification for rejecting its renewal under section 80G of the Act which is a matter of right. The conditions of section 80G(5

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 696/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2024

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik (CIT)
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ab)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iii)

trust was constituted long back on 27-8-1963 and has been carrying on such charitable activities, this Court finds no justification for rejecting its renewal under section 80G of the Act which is a matter of right. The conditions of section 80G(5

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

ITA 777/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Sept 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos.775 to 778/JP/2024 Uttrakhand Samaj 51/117 Sec 5, Pratap Nagar Sanganer, Jaipur cuke Vs. The CIT, Exemption Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAATU 6874 A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 20/08/2024 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@D

For Appellant: Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

section 80G(5)(iii) decided by The honorable High Court Of Judicature At Madras in the matter of Sri Nrisimha Priya Charitable Trust

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

ITA 775/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Sept 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

section 80G(5)(iii) decided by The honorable High Court Of Judicature At Madras in the matter of Sri Nrisimha Priya Charitable Trust

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPURTHE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

ITA 778/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Sept 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

section 80G(5)(iii) decided by The honorable High Court Of Judicature At Madras in the matter of Sri Nrisimha Priya Charitable Trust

ALL INDIA SECURITISATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ASSOCIATION,CHITRANJAN MARG vs. CIT EXEMPTION, KAILASH HEIGHT,

In the result, the both appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 627/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur04 Apr 2025

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vikash Rajvanshi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Meena, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G

charitable expenses\n16.\nProof of genuineness of activities as photographs of for conducting legal 126-129\nawareness seminar\n17.\nForm 10AC under Clause (iv) of first proviso to sub-section (5) of section 80G 130-132\nvide Unique Registration Number AAITA7176MF20210\n18.\nForm 10A under Sub-clause (A) of clause (iv) of first proviso to sub-section (5

RAJ RISHI BHARTRIHARI MATSYA UNIVERSITY ALWAR,ALWAR vs. ITO WARD 1(1), ALWAR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed\nfor statistical purpose

ITA 568/JPR/2023[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur01 May 2024
For Appellant: Sh. R. S. PooniaFor Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT)
Section 10Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

Charitable trust in ITA no. 278/Jodh/2023.\n7.\nThe Id. DR heard who relied on the findings of the Id. CIT(E) and\nsubmitted that once the assessee failed to file the form no. 10AB clause (iii)\nof first proviso to sub-section (5) of sec. 80G

SUPREME BUILDESTATES PVT LTD,MADANGANJ- KISHANGARH vs. DCIT CIRCLE 2 AJMER, JAIPUR ROAD AJMER

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 495/JPR/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Oct 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri C.M. Agarwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Anup Singh (Addl. CIT) a
Section 115JSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 2Section 234BSection 37Section 80Section 80G

section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 at the time of filing return of income. Further, the appellant had claimed a deduction of Rs.17,16,540/- (50% of 10% of Adjusted Gross Total Income other than Long Term Capital Gain) u/s 80G(5) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 as the CSR donation was made to approved charitable

SAMYAK GYAN PRACHAR PRASAR TRUST,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1438/JPR/2024[2023-2024]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Jul 2025AY 2023-2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Saurav Harsh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ajey Malik, CIT –DR (Thru” V.C.)
Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)

charitable institution. In view of the above discussion, it is clear that assessee is making huge expenditure of religious nature ad violating Section 80G(5)(ii) and sub-section (5B) of Section 80G of the Act. Therefore, the assessee is eligible for approval u/s 80G. 4.2 As regards the commencement of the activities, the assessee trust

PARITRUPTI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT(E) JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 519/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur02 Jul 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Gorav Parasar, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12Section 12ASection 5Section 8Section 80GSection 80G(5)

80G allows deduction to an assessee in computing his total income in respect of donation paid to any fund or institution. However, under sub- section 5, the deduction is allowable only if such fund or institution is established in India for charitable purpose and it fulfills the following conditions:- (i) The income of the fund or institution is exempt

PARASMAL JAIN BILASPURIYA (BARJATYA) PARMARTHIK CHARITABLE TRUST (NYAS),TONK vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

ITA 780/JPR/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2024-25

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Anoop Bhatia, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar Bhardwaj-DR (V.C.)
Section 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

5) of Section 80G of the Act for filing of such like application. Learned CIT(E) observed in the impugned order that CBDT never extended the time limit for filing of application under clause (iii) of first proviso to Section 80G of the Act. 3 Parasmal Jain Bilaspuriya (Barjatya) Parmarthik Charitable Trust

GO GRAM ECO FOUNDATION,GOVINDGARH TEHSIL CHOMU vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTIONS), JAIPUR

ITA 504/JPR/2023[Not Applicable]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Nov 2023

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (F.C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Ajay Malik (CIT) a
Section 10Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

80G allows deduction to an assessee in computing his total income in respect of donation paid to any fund or institution. However, under sub-section 5, the deduction is allowable only if such fund or institution is established in India for charitable purpose and it fulfills the following conditions:- (i) The income of the fund or institution is exempt

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 776/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Sept 2024
For Appellant: Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

Trust Act, 1959\non dated 07/03/2024 in compliance of guidelines issued by the Honorable\nSupreme Court of India. The society was re-apply for permanent registration\nunder section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on dated 30/09/2023.\n4. The Society submitted its application for renewal before the expiration of the\nprovisional registration certificate issued under section 80G

BAREFOOT COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL,KISHANGARH vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed\nOrder pronounced in the open court on\n20/02/2024

ITA 596/JPR/2023[2024-2025]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 Feb 2024AY 2024-2025
For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 11(1)(c)Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(iii)

Charitable Company under section 8 of the\nCompanies Act, 2013 and also having approval u/s 12AB of the Income-tax Act for the period\nfrom AY 2022-23 to AY 2026-27. (Refer Paper Book No. 1, Page No. 28-30)\n2. That the company applied for provisional approval u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act,\n1961 on dated

KOGTA FOUNDATION ,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, KAILASH HEIGHT

ITA 288/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2024

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

For Appellant: Miss Ridhi Rajvansi (C.A.)For Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam (CIT) (Th. V.H) a
Section 12ASection 80G

section 80G of the Act, as not already registered under clause (i) or (iii) of first proviso to 80G(5) of the Act. Hence CIT(E) order should be made null and void and CIT(E) may be directed to grant for 80G registration and rejection/cancellation order of 80G must be quashed. 2. The appellant prays your honor

KOGTA FOUNDATION ,II FLOOR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

ITA 289/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2024

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

For Appellant: Miss Ridhi Rajvansi (C.A.)For Respondent: Ms. Alka Gautam (CIT) (Th. V.H) a
Section 12ASection 80G

section 80G of the Act, as not already registered under clause (i) or (iii) of first proviso to 80G(5) of the Act. Hence CIT(E) order should be made null and void and CIT(E) may be directed to grant for 80G registration and rejection/cancellation order of 80G must be quashed. 2. The appellant prays your honor

SAKSHAM SAMAJIK UTTHAN AVEM VIKAS SANSTHAN,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

ITA 757/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G

section 80G(5)(iii) decided by The honorable High Court Of Judicature At Madras in the matter of Sri Nrisimha Priya Charitable Trust

SAKSHAM SAMAJIK UTTHAN AVEM VIKAS SANSTHAN,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

ITA 760/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G

section 80G(5)(iii) decided by The honorable High Court Of Judicature At Madras in the matter of Sri Nrisimha Priya Charitable Trust

SAKSHAM SAMAJIK UTTHAN AVEM VIKAS SANSTHAN,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

ITA 758/JPR/2024[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur27 Sept 2024

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 80G

section 80G(5)(iii) decided by The honorable High Court Of Judicature At Madras in the matter of Sri Nrisimha Priya Charitable Trust