INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD-1, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, the matter is decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue and the ground of appeal so taken by the assessee society is thus allowed

trust or institution is charitable, another object which by itself may not be charitable but which is merely ancillary or incidental or institution from being a valid charity. The court further observed that true meaning of the words in section 2

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION),WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

Section 2(15), the activities of the trust should be carried out on commercial lines with intention to make profit. Where the trust is carrying out its activates on non-commercial lines with no motive to earn profits, or fulfillment of its aims an objectives, which are charitable

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

Section 2(15), the activities of the trust should be carried out on commercial lines with intention to make profit. Where the trust is carrying out its activates on non-commercial lines with no motive to earn profits, or fulfillment of its aims an objectives, which are charitable

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

Section 2(15), the activities of the trust should be carried out on commercial lines with intention to make profit. Where the trust is carrying out its activates on non-commercial lines with no motive to earn profits, or fulfillment of its aims an objectives, which are charitable

BHARATPUR ROYAL FAMILY RELIGIOUS & CEREMONIAL TRUST,BHARATPUR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

In the result, we upheld the order of the ld PCIT in exercise of his powers u/s 263 in setting aside the order so passed by the AO and the grounds of appeal taken by the assessee are hereby dismissed

section 23 Bharatpur Royal Family Religious & Ceremonial Trust Moti Mahal, Bharatpur Vs. CIT(E), Jaipur (2) which is applied to purposes other than charitable

BHIWADI INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,BHIWADI, ALWAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), JAIPUR

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

2). It is very important to mention that charitable trusts are allowed to carry out trade and commerce activities, if they are undertaken in course of actually carrying out advancement of GPU activity, for which such trust or institution exists, however, proviso to section

THE JEWELLERS ASSOCIATION,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

trust or institution undertaking such activity or activities, of that previous year; 20 ITA 197/JP/2022 THE JEWELLERS ASSOCIATION VS ACIT, CIRCLE-1 JAIPUR It is noted from Section 2 (15) which defines 'charitable

RAWAT BAL VIDHA NIKETAN SAMITTEE,JAIPUR vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), JAIPUR

2)(c) and section\n13(3) of the Act. Following specific instances have been found, viz:- a. As per reply\ndated 15.2.2021,the trust has paid salary of Rs. 15,18,000/- to ShBachan\nSinghRawat, Rs, 12,40,800/- to SmtNirmalaRawat, Rs. 7,59,000/- to\nNarendraRawat, Rs. 7,59,000/- to HemendraRawat and Rs, 6,90,000/- to Arpan

JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal in ITA no

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

trust does not fall under the last limb of the definition of Charitable purpose. Since the assessee is engaged in above mentioned charitable purpose, hence it is not right to apply first proviso to Section 2

JODHPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,JODHPUR vs. DCIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal in ITA no

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;djvihy la-@ITA No. 665 & 666/JPR/2023 fu/kZkj.ko"kZ@Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2013-14 Jodhpur Development Authority 1, Opposite Railway Hospital, JDA Circle, Jodhpur. cuke Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Exemption, Jodhpur. LFkk;hys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAALJ 0478 P vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksjls@Assesseeby : Shri Amit Kothari (C.A.) jktLo dh vksjls@Revenue by:

trust does not fall under the last limb of the definition of Charitable purpose. Since the assessee is engaged in above mentioned charitable purpose, hence it is not right to apply first proviso to Section 2

OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION) WARD-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), DR MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

section 164(2) of the Act is applicable which is reproduced as under:- 164(2) In the case of relevant income which is derived from property held under trust wholly for charitable

AJAY BAKLIWAL,KOTA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA, KOTA

Charitable or\nreligious trust Exemption of income from property held under (Audit objection)\n Assessment year 2016-17 Assessment of assessee-trust was completed under section\n143(3) at 'Nil' income - Revenue audit party, however, objected to finalization of retum of\nassessee-trust at 'Nil' for reason that during year, assessee received corpus donations\nwhich were not included in income

MANDIR SHREE BHAIRAV JI TRUST,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Trust are not eligible u/s 80G(5) 2.1 The provision of section 80G(5) are as under: “80G(5) This section applies to donations to any institutions or fund referred to in sub clause (iv) of clause (a) of subsection (2), only if it is established in India for a charitable

ALL INDIA SECURITISATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ASSOCIATION,CHITRANJAN MARG vs. CIT EXEMPTION, KAILASH HEIGHT,

In the result, the both appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

2 of CIT Order\n\nThe CIT states that \" In the absence of registration under Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, assessee is\nnot eligible for registration u/s 12AB.\"\n\nThe assessee trust is a charitable trust duly registered with Sub- Registrar, Jaipur V vide registration\nendorsement serial number 2007397010949 on dated 20.07.2007 vide PB No.1-17. Further the trust\namended

TREHAN SEVA BHARTI CHARITABLE TRUST,ALWAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

trust with reference to the construction of the expressions\n'charitable purpose' and 'religious purpose.' [Para 28]\n\nThe phrase charitable purpose is expansive and inclusive. The expression 'charitable purpose' is\ndefined in the dictionary clause of the Act under section 2

ACIT(EXEMP), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue is dismissed

charitable Trust u/s 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The relevant part of the Circular which are reproduced as under:- “ EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION

ACIT(EXEMP), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue is dismissed

charitable Trust u/s 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The relevant part of the Circular which are reproduced as under:- “ EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION

ACIT(EXEMP), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue is dismissed

charitable Trust u/s 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The relevant part of the Circular which are reproduced as under:- “ EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION