TREHAN SEVA BHARTI CHARITABLE TRUST,ALWAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Charitable Trust,\nKalani & Co., 5th Floor, Milestone Building\nGandhi Nagar Turn, Tonk Road,\nJaipur - 302 015.\nPAN No.:AADTT8776F\nAppellant\n\nVs.\n\nCIT Exemption,\nJaipur - 302 015.\nRespondent\n\nAppellant by\n: Mr. P. C. Parwal, CA, Ld. AR\nRespondent by\n: Ms. Alka Gautam, CIT, Ld. DR\nDate of hearing\n: 08/01/2025\nDate of pronouncement : 15/01/2025\n\nORDER

MSB EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KOTA, RAJASTHAN vs. CIT(E) JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, this last objection also no more stands on its legs

Bench: Shri Gagan Goyal & Shri Narinder Kumarmsb Educational Society, Plot No. 1, Burhani Park, Ward No. 1, Ramnagar Nanta, Kota 324 008 Pan No. Aaqam 8644P ...... Appellant Vs.

17 of the RPT Act, 1959, appropriate action can be taken against the trustees of the trust. But this issue can’t be a hurdle in getting registration before the Income Tax Department under section 12AB. [Para 8] In view of discussion, there is no any force in the findings of the Commissioner (Exemption) while holding registration application untenable

BHARATPUR ROYAL FAMILY RELIGIOUS & CEREMONIAL TRUST,BHARATPUR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

In the result, we upheld the order of the ld PCIT in exercise of his powers u/s 263 in setting aside the order so passed by the AO and the grounds of appeal taken by the assessee are hereby dismissed

17. It was submitted by the ld CIT/DR that it is obvious from the above accounts that the trust, prior to registration was not receiving any public donations, whereas after registration it is receiving donations, which is another indicator that the trust was indeed a private religious trust before the said amendments were carried out in the trust deed

MANDIR SHREE BHAIRAV JI TRUST,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

17(P&H) wherein the principle as laid down as above was accepted. Hence Assessee trust should be treated as Charitable Trust instead of Religious Trust. 10 Mandir Shree Bhairav Ji Trust vs. CIT Exemption Also recently decided on 9.1.2013 by Hon’ble ITAT C” BENCH : BANGALORE vide ITA Nos.1082, 1083/Bang/2022 in case of Shri Shruthiparampara Gurukulam vs. ITO,Ward

OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION,JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN vs. ITO, (EXEMPTION) WARD-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), DR MITHA LAL MEENA (Accountant Member)

Charitable expenditure i.e. Food for hunger Rs. 3,52,338.00. The Ld. CIT(A) also erred in not considering the ground. 7 OM KOTHARI FOUNDATION VS ITO (EXEMPTION), WARD -1 , JAIPUR 7. That the Ld. A.O. grossly erred in disallowing the P.F. Expenses 10,135.00 8. That the Ld. A.O. grossly erred in making the addition on A/c of Building

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

charitable and thus is not eligible for registration under Section 12A. On behalf of the appellant, reliance has been placed on decisions in the case of CIT vs. Dawoodi Bohara Jamat (2014) 364 ITR 31 (SC), CIT vs. Paramhans Ashram Trust (1993) 203 ITR 711 (Raj.), Diocese of Pune (CNI vs. CIT (2015) 42 ITR (Trib.) 348 (Pune

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

charitable and thus is not eligible for registration under Section 12A. On behalf of the appellant, reliance has been placed on decisions in the case of CIT vs. Dawoodi Bohara Jamat (2014) 364 ITR 31 (SC), CIT vs. Paramhans Ashram Trust (1993) 203 ITR 711 (Raj.), Diocese of Pune (CNI vs. CIT (2015) 42 ITR (Trib.) 348 (Pune

WHOLE SALE CLOTH MERCHANT ASSOCIATION ,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE KOTA , KOTA

17,30,356/- AR filed that this amount is utilized as revenue expenditure. The remaining amount is claimed exempted u/s 11(2) and 11(1)(a) of the Act which is not allowable. The Trust is a public charitable trust and mainly formed for the upliftment of the cloth merchants of the city but fund of trust was utilized

BHIWADI INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,BHIWADI, ALWAR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), JAIPUR

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

section, applied for charitable or religious purposes and the income in form voluntary contribution with the specific directions that they shall form part of the corpus of the trust or 17

AAGAZ SAMAJIK VIKAS SANSTHA ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr.S.Seethalakshmi & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.809 & 810/Jpr/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year(S) : - Aagaz Samajik Vikas The Commissioner Of Sanstha, V Income Tax, 45A/69, Near Office Lane, S Exemption, Jaipur. Behind Rainbow Jewellers, Jagdish Colony, Ramgarh Mode, Jaipur – 302002. Pan: Aaeaa5124E Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri Ajey Malik – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 22/07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 30/08/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against Two Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Jaipur Both Dated 25.02.2023. The Assessee In Ita No.809/Jpr/2023 Has Raised The Following Ground Of Appeal :

17 (1) of Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, mandates that every public trust shall register itself under this act. Further, section 2(11) of Rajasthan Public Trust Act. 1959 defines public trust, which include all public charitable

AAGAZ SAMAJIK VIKAS SANSTHA ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr.S.Seethalakshmi & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.809 & 810/Jpr/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year(S) : - Aagaz Samajik Vikas The Commissioner Of Sanstha, V Income Tax, 45A/69, Near Office Lane, S Exemption, Jaipur. Behind Rainbow Jewellers, Jagdish Colony, Ramgarh Mode, Jaipur – 302002. Pan: Aaeaa5124E Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri Ajey Malik – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 22/07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 30/08/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against Two Separate Orders Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemption), Jaipur Both Dated 25.02.2023. The Assessee In Ita No.809/Jpr/2023 Has Raised The Following Ground Of Appeal :

17 (1) of Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959, mandates that every public trust shall register itself under this act. Further, section 2(11) of Rajasthan Public Trust Act. 1959 defines public trust, which include all public charitable

SUNRISE SHIKSHAN SANSTHAN,SIKAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: The Time Of Hearing.” 2. The Hearing Of The Appeal Was Concluded Through Video Conference In View Of The Prevailing Situation Of Covid-19 Pandemic.

Charitable or religious trust —Registration procedure — Assessment year 2010-11 — Whether while examining application seeking registration under section 12AA, manner of application of funds of trust do not fall within purview of Commissioner; Commissioner should only satisfy himself about genuineness of aims and objects of trust/institution and genuineness of its activities as enumerated in clause (b) of sub-section

SHRI SUKH LAL RATHI CHARITABLE TRUST,JAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

17 as well as a proper clarification regarding the discrepancy in the name of the assessee Trust. Therefore, the assessee has not made the requisite documents available before the ld. CIT(E) to arrive at the decision that the objects of the assessee Trust are charitable in nature and the activity of the assessee Trust are genuine. He has relied

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION),WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

17. Section 2(15) of the Act of 1961 which defines ‘charitable purposes’ reads as under: “(15) ‘charitable purpose’ includes relief of the poor, education, medical relief, preservation of environment ( including watersheds, forests and wildlife) and preservation of monuments o places or objects of artistic or historic interest, and the advancement of any other object of general public utility; Provided

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

17. Section 2(15) of the Act of 1961 which defines ‘charitable purposes’ reads as under: “(15) ‘charitable purpose’ includes relief of the poor, education, medical relief, preservation of environment ( including watersheds, forests and wildlife) and preservation of monuments o places or objects of artistic or historic interest, and the advancement of any other object of general public utility; Provided

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), WARD, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. RAJASTHAN CRICKET ASSOCIATION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the Department is dismissed

Bench: The Hon’Ble Tribunal In The Interest Of Justice.

17. Section 2(15) of the Act of 1961 which defines ‘charitable purposes’ reads as under: “(15) ‘charitable purpose’ includes relief of the poor, education, medical relief, preservation of environment ( including watersheds, forests and wildlife) and preservation of monuments o places or objects of artistic or historic interest, and the advancement of any other object of general public utility; Provided

RAM NIWAS MODI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are disposed off\nthereby allowing the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Charitable Society, Kota.\ngenuineness of the trust, society etc. This reasoning is reinforced by the recent\ninsertion of another proviso of section 10(23C) with effect from 1-42021. [Para\n76]\"\n7.Again referring our considered opinion as discussed (supra) vide para 5, this\ncitation relied upon by the Ld. CIT (E), Jaipur is again w.r.t. an educational\ninstitution

ACIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE , JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee’s income is found to be not chargeable under the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions made, irrespective of the head of income

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyalacit, Exemption, Circle, Jaipur ...... Appellant Vs.

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust. 5. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not allowing the allowing the depreciation alternatively claimed by the Appellant. 6. Under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not allowing various expenditure incurred