RAWAT BAL VIDHA NIKETAN SAMITTEE,JAIPUR vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), JAIPUR

charitable purposes and therefore\nthe trust has violated provisions of section 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) of the\nIT Act 1961. As such

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,EXEMPTIONS,CIRCLE,JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. GLOBAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY, JAIPUR RAJASTHAN

In the results the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

13. (1) Nothing contained in section 11 or section 12 shall operate so as to exclude from the total income of the previous year of the person in receipt thereof— (a) any part of the income from the property held under a trust for private religious purposes which does not enure for the benefit of the public

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Trust with charitable objects, which existed for the benefit of a particular religious community qualified as charitable entity serving the public at large and this was sufficient for grant of registration under section 12A of the Act, and the provisions of section 13(1

VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Trust with charitable objects, which existed for the benefit of a particular religious community qualified as charitable entity serving the public at large and this was sufficient for grant of registration under section 12A of the Act, and the provisions of section 13(1

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR RAJASTHAN vs. NAVRATAN VIDHA MANDIR SHIKSHA SAMITI, JAIPUR RAJASTHAN

In the result appeal filed by the Department is dismissed and the C

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

13(1)(d) read with Section 11(5) of the Act, since such loans were neither investments nor deposits. No doubt, the assessee here had mentioned the amounts given to M/s SPK MAC Charitable Trust

ICON FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable\ntrust, applied for registration under section 12AA Commissioner rejected said\napplication holding that trust was for benefit of Leuva Patel Community and, therefore, it\nwould be covered under section 13(1

SCHOLARS EDUCATION TRUST OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR , JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Section 13(1)\nrws 13(3) of the Act, the same cannot form basis for withdrawal of exemption/\napproval granted to a charitable trust

TREHAN SEVA BHARTI CHARITABLE TRUST,ALWAR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

charitable trust subject to provisions of section 13. The activities of the\ntrust under such objects would therefore be entitled to exemption accordingly. [Para 41]\n\nFurther, one has to examine the objects under the provisions of section 13(1

ICON FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

charitable\ntrust, applied for registration under section 12AA Commissioner rejected said\napplication holding that trust was for benefit of Leuva Patel Community and, therefore, it\nwould be covered under section 13(1

MSB EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KOTA, RAJASTHAN vs. CIT(E) JAIPUR, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN

In the result, this last objection also no more stands on its legs

Bench: Shri Gagan Goyal & Shri Narinder Kumarmsb Educational Society, Plot No. 1, Burhani Park, Ward No. 1, Ramnagar Nanta, Kota 324 008 Pan No. Aaqam 8644P ...... Appellant Vs.

charitable trust subject to provisions of section 13. The activities of the trust under such objects would therefore be entitled to exemption accordingly. [Para 41] Further, one has to examine the objects under the provisions of section 13(1

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR vs. M/S APOLLO ANIMAL MEDICAL GROUP TRUST, JAIPUR

In the result, the grounds of appeal taken by the Revenue are dismissed

trust for personal benefit of the meaning trustee, Thus, the AO was of the view that the assessee had violated the provisions of sec, 13(1)(c)(ii) of the Act and sec, 11(5). Section 13(1)(c) of the Act has carved out an exception from exemption in cases where a part of income of a charitable

BHARATPUR ROYAL FAMILY RELIGIOUS & CEREMONIAL TRUST,BHARATPUR vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR

In the result, we upheld the order of the ld PCIT in exercise of his powers u/s 263 in setting aside the order so passed by the AO and the grounds of appeal taken by the assessee are hereby dismissed

13 of the Act of 1961 and thus saved by section 297(2)(k) of the Act of 1961. 27. Section 11 of the Act of 1961 has been amended from time to time. As per section 11(1) of the Act, subject to provisions of sections 60 to 63, where the trust having been created before the commencement

PORWAL YUVAK SANGH KOTA,KOTA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

charitable trust subject to provisions of section 13. The activities of the trust under\nsuch objects would therefore be entitled to exemption accordingly. [Para 41]\nFurther, one has to examine the objects under the provisions of section 13(1

DISHA DELPHI EDUCATION SOCIETY C/O- KALANI & CO. CA, 5TH FLOOR, KILESTONE BUILDING GANDHINAGAR TURN, TONK ROAD, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. PR. CIT(CENTRAL), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 626/Jp/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :............ Disha Delphi Education Society, Cuke Pr.Cit (Central), 334, Asiad Village, Hauz Khas, Vs. Jaipur. New Delhi-110049. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aaatd 8461 G Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 313/Jp/2020 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year: 2016-17 Disha Delphi Education Society, Cuke Pr.Cit (Central), Vs. 334, Asiad Village, Hauz Khas, Jaipur. New Delhi-110049. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aaatd 8461 G Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri P.C. Parwal (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri Ajay Chandra (Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 05/10/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 27/12/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. These Are The Appeals Filed By The Common Assessee Against The Separate Order Of Ld. Pr.Cit(Central), Rajasthan, Jaipur Dated 22/03/2019 & 29/10/2020 For The A.Y. 2016-17 In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S 2

13. (1) Nothing contained in section 11 or section 12 shall operate so as to exclude from the total income of the previous year of the person in receipt thereof— (a) ….. (b) …… (bb) [***] (c) in the case of a trust for charitable

M/S. DISHA DELPHI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,NEW DELHI vs. PR.CIT, CENTRAL, JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 626/Jp/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :............ Disha Delphi Education Society, Cuke Pr.Cit (Central), 334, Asiad Village, Hauz Khas, Vs. Jaipur. New Delhi-110049. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aaatd 8461 G Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 313/Jp/2020 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year: 2016-17 Disha Delphi Education Society, Cuke Pr.Cit (Central), Vs. 334, Asiad Village, Hauz Khas, Jaipur. New Delhi-110049. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aaatd 8461 G Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri P.C. Parwal (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri Ajay Chandra (Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 05/10/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 27/12/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. These Are The Appeals Filed By The Common Assessee Against The Separate Order Of Ld. Pr.Cit(Central), Rajasthan, Jaipur Dated 22/03/2019 & 29/10/2020 For The A.Y. 2016-17 In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S 2

13. (1) Nothing contained in section 11 or section 12 shall operate so as to exclude from the total income of the previous year of the person in receipt thereof— (a) ….. (b) …… (bb) [***] (c) in the case of a trust for charitable

CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATION TRUST,JAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

1,27,29,774/-. Apparently, this is diversion of funds for the\nbenefits of trustees which comes under purview of provisions of section 13(2)(a)\nand 13(2)(g) of the I.T. Act, 1961. The ld. AO has further observed in its proposal,\nthat assessee has also made some more payments to the persons referred u/s 13

ALL INDIA SECURITISATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ASSOCIATION,CHITRANJAN MARG vs. CIT EXEMPTION, KAILASH HEIGHT,

In the result, the both appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

charitable institution\nu/s 12A. Mentioning wrong reasons such as due to non-registration under Rajasthan\nPublic Trust Act, 1959 and genuineness of activities and also cancelled provisional\nregistration whereas trust has complied all the procedure. Hence, rejection/cancellation\norder must be quashed. ''\n\nITA No. 628/JPR/2024 U/s 80G of I.T. Act, 1961\n\"1. CIT(E) has wrongly rejected the application

MANDIR SHREE BHAIRAV JI TRUST,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

13(1)(b) of the Act. In that view of the matter, the Court held that the respondent-trust is a charitable and religious trust which does not benefit any specific religious community and therefore, it cannot be held that Section