VARDHMAN SATHANAKVASI JAIN SRAVAK SANGH,AJMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

charitable activities. The assessee is also registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. The application for the registration of the trust u/s. 12AB was rejected on three counts. First one non submission of original copy of original deed. Object clause of the assessee is for caste / community and non-genuineness of activities and non-compliance by the assessee

MANDIR SHREE BHAIRAV JI TRUST,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

charitable trust eligible for registration fulfilling conditions u/s 80G(5)(iii) ( vide PB page no 69 to72). Hence your Honor is requested to grant the approval u/s 80G and justice should be imparted in the favour of assessee. SUBMITTING ACCORDINGLY WITH THE WARMEST REGARD & PRAY FOR JUSTICE.” 6. The ld. AR of the assessee in support of the written submission

JAIPUR NATIONAL UNIVERSITY SOCIETY FOR SOCIAL WELFARE,JAIPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

natural justice and various other statutory reasons, thus deserves to be quashed.” 3. The brief fact of the case is that the assessee filed an online application on 27.09.2023 in Form No. 10AB seeking registration u/s 12AB of the Act, 1961. While dealing with that application so filed by the assessee ld. CIT(E) issued a letter / notice dated

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

natural justice.\n4. The assessee, registered under the Rajasthan Society Registration Act,\n1958, was also duly registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. The\nsociety help to poors and needy persons. The society's object and acitivity is fully\ncharitable. Recognized as a charitable

SAKSHAM SAMAJIK UTTHAN AVEM VIKAS SANSTHAN,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

natural justice. 8. The assessee, registered under the Rajasthan Society Registration Act, 1958, was also duly registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. Recognized as a charitable

SAKSHAM SAMAJIK UTTHAN AVEM VIKAS SANSTHAN,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

natural justice. 8. The assessee, registered under the Rajasthan Society Registration Act, 1958, was also duly registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. Recognized as a charitable

SAKSHAM SAMAJIK UTTHAN AVEM VIKAS SANSTHAN,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

natural justice. 8. The assessee, registered under the Rajasthan Society Registration Act, 1958, was also duly registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. Recognized as a charitable

SAKSHAM SAMAJIK UTTHAN AVEM VIKAS SANSTHAN,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

natural justice. 8. The assessee, registered under the Rajasthan Society Registration Act, 1958, was also duly registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. Recognized as a charitable

MANCAN FOUNDATION,UDAIPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 1092/Jp/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :.................. Cuke Mancan Foundation, C.I.T.(Exemption) Vs. Udaipur. Jaipur. C/O-Shah Patni & Co. Chartered Accountants, S.B. One, Babu Nagar, Jln Marg, Jaipur- 302015. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aaftm 7600 K Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By: Shri Pramod Patni (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri Ambrish Bedi (Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 12/01/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 29/01/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur (In Short, The Cit(E)) Dated 27/06/2019 Passed U/S 12Aa(1)(B)(Ii) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act). In This Appeal, The Assessee Has Taken Following Grounds: “1. The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax Has Grossly Erred In Fact As Well As In Law In Rejection The Application For Registration U/S. 12Aa Of Income Tax Act, 1961 Of The Appellant Company:

justice and equity in the interest of the Trust and its objects of charitable nature viz., Cancer awareness and guidance

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

natural justice. 4. The assessee, registered under the Rajasthan Society Registration Act, 1958, was also duly registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. The society help to poors and needy persons. The society’s object and activity is fully charitable

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPURTHE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

natural justice. 4. The assessee, registered under the Rajasthan Society Registration Act, 1958, was also duly registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. The society help to poors and needy persons. The society’s object and activity is fully charitable

UTTRAKHAND SAMAJ,JAIPUR vs. THE CIT, EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed, for statistical

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, vk;dj vihy la-@ITA Nos.775 to 778/JP/2024 Uttrakhand Samaj 51/117 Sec 5, Pratap Nagar Sanganer, Jaipur cuke Vs. The CIT, Exemption Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAATU 6874 A vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. K. L. Choudhary, CA jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh. Arvind Kumar, CIT-DR lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 20/08/2024 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@D

natural justice. 4. The assessee, registered under the Rajasthan Society Registration Act, 1958, was also duly registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. The society help to poors and needy persons. The society’s object and activity is fully charitable

AKHIL BHARATVARSHIYA PAPEEK ASHRAM TRUST,AJMER vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member), SHRI NARINDER KUMAR (Judicial Member)

charitable activities and bills/ vouchers, the trust society as organised--------” (page 3 of ld. CIT –form 10AD) Thus the ld. CIT has himself observed submissions of bills and vouchers by the assessee and therefore, subsequent allegation of not submitting bills/ vouchers is contrary to the facts on record Therefore, in the light of the above facts and circumstances

DCIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction under section 24 of the Income\nTax Act, 1961 while determining the income of the Appellant Trust under head\n'income from house property'.\n6. Under the facts

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,KOTA vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction under section 24 of the Income\nTax Act, 1961 while determining the income of the Appellant Trust under head\n'income from house property'.\n6. Under the facts

DCIT, EXEMPTIONS, CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, KOTA

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction under section 24 of the Income\nTax Act, 1961 while determining the income of the Appellant Trust under head\n'income from house property'.\n6. Under the facts

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST (NOW KOTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY),KOTA vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction under section 24 of the Income\nTax Act, 1961 while determining the income of the Appellant Trust under head\n'income from house property'.\n6. Under the facts

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST,KOTA vs. DCIT (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the assessee's income is found to be not chargeable\nunder the Income Tax Act at all and the AO is directed to delete the additions\nmade, irrespective of the head of income

charitable objects of the Appellant Trust.\n5. under the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT (A) has erred\nin not allowing the allowing the statutory deduction under section 24 of the Income\nTax Act, 1961 while determining the income of the Appellant Trust under head\n'income from house property'.\n6. Under the facts