MAHESH KUMAR GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ACIT ,CIRCLE-4, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

charitable trust, had disclosed donations received by it as its income, and claimed exemption u/s. 11. The Assessing Officer, on finding that the assessee was unable to satisfactorily explain the donations and the donors were fictitious persons, held that the assessee had tried to introduce unaccounted money in its books by way of donations and, therefore, the amount

JITENDRA KUMAR TAHILRAMANI,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD-2, JAIPUR., JAIPUR

Bench: Him.

charitable trust, had disclosed donations received by it as its income, and claimed exemption u/s. 11. The Assessing Officer, on finding that the assessee was unable to satisfactorily explain the donations and the donors were fictitious persons, held that the assessee had tried to introduce unaccounted money in its books by way of donations and, therefore, the amount

SANDEEP SETHI ,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

charitable trust, had disclosed donations received by it as its income, and claimed exemption u/s. 11. The Assessing Officer, on finding that the assessee was unable to satisfactorily explain the donations and the donors were fictitious persons, held that the assessee had tried to introduce unaccounted money in its books by way of donations and, therefore, the amount

RAJIV NIGOTIYA,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

charitable trust, had disclosed donations received by it as its income, and claimed exemption u/s. 11. The Assessing Officer, on finding that the assessee was unable to satisfactorily explain the donations and the donors were fictitious persons, held that the assessee had tried to introduce unaccounted money in its books by way of donations and, therefore, the amount

ASHOK NARIYANI,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

charitable trust, had disclosed donations received by it as its income, and claimed\nexemption u/s.11. The Assessing Officer, on finding that the assessee was unable to\nsatisfactorily explain the donations and the donors were fictitious persons, held that\nthe assessee had tried to introduce unaccounted money in its books by way of\ndonations and, therefore, the amount

KAMAL SINGH,BHARATPUR vs. ITO WD 1, BHARATPUR, BHARATPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: BEFORE: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Trust, Sector-9, Faridabad, 2431, Faridabad, Sector-7, SO Faridabad, Haryana Vs. CIT Exemption, Chandigarh (Appellant) (Respondent)has held as under:- 5. We find that main grievance of the assessee is that the notice calling for certain details issued by the Id CIT(E) were uploaded only in the income tax e filing portal and the same were not sent

PANKAJ MANI KULSHRESHTHA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(5), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: The Hearing.”

Charitable Trust (Gujarat High Court) R/Tax Appeal No. 1335 of 2018 Date of 11 Sh. Panka Mani Khulshrestha vs. ITO Judgement/Order: 30/07/2019 while deciding the issue under consideration if Assesseeremained absent on more than one occasions and appeal decided on merits then whether it will be called as Ex-parte order. The Hon'ble High Court states that

SH. TARACHAND GUPTA,ALWAR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALWAR, ALWAR

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue in ITA no

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA. Nos.447 to 449/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2015-16 to 2017-18 Shri Tarachand Gupta 9 Keshav Nagar Sch 13, Alwar बनाम Vs. ACIT, Central Circle, Alwar स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AAYPC 5777 E अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ITA. No. 514/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 ACIT, Central Circle, Alwar बनाम Shri Tarachand Gupta 9 Ke

Charitable Trust (2022) 144 taxmann.com 54 (Madras)/(2023) 450 ITR 368 (Madras)[31.10.2022] x x x x Dr. S.C. Gupta v. CIT [2001] 118 Taxman 252 (Allahabad) x x x x Bachittar Singh vs CIT [2010] 328 ITR 400 (Punjab & Haryana) x x x x CIT vs. Hotel Meriya [2010] 195 Taxman 459 (Kerala)/(2011) 332 ITR 537 (Kerala

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALWAR vs. SH. TARA CHAND GUPTA, ALWAR

In the result the appeal filed by the revenue in ITA no

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA. Nos.447 to 449/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2015-16 to 2017-18 Shri Tarachand Gupta 9 Keshav Nagar Sch 13, Alwar बनाम ACIT, Vs. Central Circle, Alwar स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AAYPC 5777 E अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent आयकर अपील सं./ITA. No. 514/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 ACIT, Central Circle, Alwar बनाम Shri Tarachand Gupta 9 Kesh

Charitable Trust (2022) 144 taxmann.com 54 (Madras)/(2023) 450 ITR 368 (Madras)[31.10.2022] x x x x Dr. S.C. Gupta v. CIT [2001] 118 Taxman 252 (Allahabad) x x x x Bachittar Singh vs CIT [2010] 328 ITR 400 (Punjab & Haryana) x x x x CIT vs. Hotel Meriya [2010] 195 Taxman 459 (Kerala)/(2011) 332 ITR 537 (Kerala

GOLECHAS JEWELS,JAIPUR vs. CIT(A), DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assesee is allowed\nOrder pronounced in the open court on\n10/04/2024

charitable trust, had disclosed donations received by it as its income,\nand claimed exemption u/s. 11. The Assessing Officer, on finding that the assessee\nwas unable to satisfactorily explain the donations and the donors were fictitious\npersons, held that the assessee had tried to introduce unaccounted money in its\nbooks by way of donations and, therefore, the amount

SHRI RAJ KUMAR GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6-2, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 1460/Jp/2018 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, Cuke I.T.O. Vs. F-100, Panchsheel Marg, C-Scheme, Ward-6(2), Jaipur-302001. Jaipur. Pan No.: Ahppg 4958 H Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Vikash Rajvanshi (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Smt. Rooni Paul (Addl.Cit) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 07/12/2020 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 09/12/2020 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Ajmer Dated 17/10/2018 For The A.Y. 2014-15. The Effective Ground Raised By The Assessee In The Appeal Reads As Under: “1. The Assessee Could Not File The Appeal In Time At Cit Level As He Got Sick & Mentally Upset Due To Deep Financial Pressure As He Was Suffering From Financial Hardship & Seeked Condonation Of Delay Of 38 Days In Filing The Appeal But His Appeal Was Dismissed By Cit(A) Without Dealing On The Basis Of Merits Of The Case As Cit Sustained The Arbitrarily Disallowance By Ld. Ao Of Lump Sum Addition Of Rs. 4,00,000/- Out Of Other Expenses Without Any Basis. Also Assessing Officer Has Erred In Law By Arbitrarily Disallowing Lump Sum Amount Of Rs. 4,00,000/- Without Issuing Show Cause Notice U/S 143(2) Which Is Violation Of The Principle Of Nature Justice.”

demonetization which is uncontrollable in the hands of the assessee. Thus, it should be considered as a sufficient cause and condonation of delay should be allowed. The cases highlighted above clearly specifies that merely delay in filing cannot be the ground for rejection of an appeal is the reason that the legislature itself has conferred the power to condone delay

NITIN VIJAY,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(4), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Charitable\nFoundation (2005) 278 ITR 152, considered a situation where the assessee, a\ncharitable trust, had disclosed donations received by it as its income, and\nclaimed exemption u/s. 11. The Assessing Officer, on finding that the\nassessee was unable to satisfactorily explain the donations and the donors\nwere fictitious persons, held that the assessee had tried to introduce\nunaccounted money

ST. WILFRED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR

charitable education purposes and therefore the activities of the assessee society are not genuine. 10. The ld CIT DR has heavily relied on the aforesaid findings of the ld Pr.CIT. and submitted that fees have been collected in cash by the assessee society from its students and given that the same was not recorded in its books of account

ST. WILFRED EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) RAJASTHAN, JAIPUR

charitable education purposes and therefore the activities of the assessee society are not genuine. 10. The ld CIT DR has heavily relied on the aforesaid findings of the ld Pr.CIT. and submitted that fees have been collected in cash by the assessee society from its students and given that the same was not recorded in its books of account

GARGI GLOBAL ACADEMY SANSTHAN,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

charitable society with the main object of carrying out educational activities. A search and seizure action u/s 132 was carried out on the members of Prince Group, Sikar on 10/03/2018 of which assessee is one of the entity. In response to notice u/s 153C, the appellant filed its return of income declaring total income

VIVEKANDA SHIKSHA SAMITI,PALWAS ROAD, SIKAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

charitable society with the\nmain object of carrying out educational activities. A search and seizure action u/s\n132 was carried out on the members of Prince Group, Sikar on 10/03/2018 of\nwhich assessee is one of the entity. In response to notice u/s 153C, the appellant\nfiled its return of income declaring total income

RAWAT BAL VIDHA NIKETAN SAMITTEE,JAIPUR vs. ACIT CEN CIR 2, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

trust exemption u/s 11 of the Act denied by the ld. AO and case of the assessee was assessed as AOP at maximum Marginal Rate (MMR) as per proviso to section 164 of the Act. Finally, the AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 30.12.2019 at a total income

RAWAT BAL VIDHA NIKETAN SAMITTEE,JAIPUR vs. ACIT CEN CIR 2, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

trust exemption u/s 11 of the Act denied by the ld. AO and case of the assessee was assessed as AOP at maximum Marginal Rate (MMR) as per proviso to section 164 of the Act. Finally, the AO completed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 30.12.2019 at a total income