DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n\n4.\nThe appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year

SANJIV PRAKASHAN,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR

43,997 is deleted. This ground is "Allowed". 8. Ground No (i) and (iv) are general in nature and does not require any separate adjudication and treated as dismissed. 9. In the result, the appeal is "Partly Allowed." 5. As the assessee did not find any favour, from the appeal so filed before the Id. CIT(A)/NFAC, the assessee

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n4. The appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year. Year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n4. The appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year. Year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n4. The appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year. Year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n4. The appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year. Year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n4. The appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year. Year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n4. The appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year. Year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n4. The appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year. Year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n4. The appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year. Year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n4. The appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year. Year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n4. The appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year. Year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

capital gains tax was not leviable but tax was leviable on interest earned on\nthe amount awarded on year to year basis.\n4. The appellant through counsel sent a letter dated 17-9-1993 informing the ITO\nthat he had received interest amount of Rs.76,84,829 and interest accrued from\nyear to year was assessable in each year. Year

OMPRAKASH,DHOLPUR vs. ITO WARD 4 BHARATPUR, BHARATPUR

In the result, the both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical\npurposes as indicated hereinabove\nOrder pronounced in the open court on\n17/01/2025

capital gain. The Ld. ITO has not applied his mind to calculate\ncapital gain prescribed U/s 45 of Income Tax Act 1961. That the Humble appellant has\nsold out Agriculture Land which is situated in Rural Area at Village Badraitha\nKanchanpur Tehsil Bari Distt Dholpur. The Land situated at Village Badraitha is 15 Km\nfrom Bari which is Tehsil

MAHAVEER YADAV,JAIPUR vs. ITO, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

1- 4-1985, the extended meaning of the word ‘transfer’ was applicable in respect of such conversion. However, capital gain could not be computed unless such stock-in-trade was sold or otherwise transferred. The gain arose only on sale or transfer otherwise. It did not amount to giving retrospective effect to the statutes but applying the law applicable

PRADEEP VATRANA,ALWAR vs. DCIT, ALWAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

1- 4-1985, the extended meaning of the word ‘transfer’ was applicable in respect of such conversion. However, capital gain could not be computed unless such stock-in-trade was sold or otherwise transferred. The gain arose only on sale or transfer otherwise. It did not amount to giving retrospective effect to the 17 Pradeep Vatrana, Alwar vs. DCIT, Alwar

UDAI SINGH RATHORE,JAIPUR vs. ITO, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Or At The Time Of Hearing.”

43,470/- on account of capital gain on the basis of remand report as against original addition of Rs. 25,15,980/-. 3. The assessee craves your indulgence to add amend or alter all or any grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing.” The assessee has also raised the additional ground:- “Under the facts and circumstances

FEDERATION OF RAJASTHAN TRADE AND INDUSTRY,JAIPUR vs. ITO-EXEMPTION WARD-2, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

gains, assessee claimed cost of acquisition being fair market value as on 1-4- 1981 Assessing Officer held that there was no cost incurred for purchase/acquisition of tenancy rights and accordingly took cost of acquisition at nil Whether case of assessee fell under section 49(1)(iii)(a) and once capital asset in question became property of assessee