OM PRAKASH SHARMA,SANGANER JAIPUR vs. WARD 4(3), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal is treated as allowed

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, by\nITO, Ward 4(3), Jaipur before him.\n2\nITA No. 43/JP/2024\nOm Prakash Sharma vs. ITO\nThe present is for the following grounds: -\n\"1. The A.O. erred in not following the principles of natural justice and in failing to\nprovide adequate and meaningful opportunity and ignoring the evidence on record

RAMAKANT SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 264/Jp/2017 Assessment Year: 2007-08 Shri Ramakant Sharma, Cuke I.T.O., Vs. S/O- Shri Ramesh Chand Sharma, 1 Ward-3(5), Vimal Kunaj, Vidyut Nagar, Behind Jaipur. Bharat Petrol Pump, Jaipur. Pan No.: Bjrps 5130 A Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Vedant Agarwal (Adv) & Shri Satish Gupta (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri Ambrish Bedi (Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 26/11/2020 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 07/12/2020 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. The Present Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-1, Jaipur Dated 05/12/2016 For The A.Y. 2007-08. Following Grounds Have Been Taken By The Assessee: “1. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law Also Ld. Lower Authorities Grossly Erred In Initiating Reassessment Proceedings U/S 147 Of The Act. 2. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law Also Ld. A.O. Grossly Erred In Resuming Jurisdiction Without Serving Notice U/S 148 On The Appellant Assessee As Notice Issued U/S 148 Was Not Served On The Appellant.

Capital Gains. 8. On the facts & circumstances of the case Ld. CIT (A) also grossly erred in not fully accepting additional evidence filled by the assessee. 9. On the facts & circumstances of the case and law also ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in not admitting the agreement to sale dated 22.01.2006 as an addition evidence under rule

SHRI ARVIND SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1-3, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

271A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act). 2 ITA 1040/JP/2019 Arvind Sharma Vs ITO 2. Rival contentions have been heard and record perused. Facts in brief are that the assessment was reopened on getting information that the assessee was taking bogus entries of long term capital gain amount to Rs. 2,39,25,064/-. After reopening

MANISHA GAHLOT,JAIPUR vs. ACIT WRAD 1(3) JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Sandep Gosain & Dr. M. L. Meena

gains and other sources which has been accepted by the ld. Assessing Officer (APB pg. 5-6). He contended that the assessee has submitted a copy of statement of IIFL for the period under consideration with the details of his share transactions and copy of bank pass book. After due verification of detailed documents filed, the AO has accepted

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. INDU RATHORE, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

capital gain’’ and income from other sources. The notice u/s143(2) of the Act was issued on 09-08-2018 which was served upon the assessee through registered post and online ITBA portal and e-mail id. It is noticed that during the assessment year under consideration 07 3 ITO, WARD 6(4), JAIPUR VS SMT INDU RATHORE, JAIPUR notices