ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. ASHA JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain in the hand of Shri Rajendra Agarwal, no other incriminating material either found or referred or is the basis of the addition mode by the AO while framing the assessment under section 153A of the Act for the assessment years 2010-11 to 13-14. It is appropriate to refer relevant part of the assessment order in para

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SANGEETA MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain in the hand of Shri Rajendra Agarwal, no other incriminating material either found or referred or is the basis of the addition mode by the AO while framing the assessment under section 153A of the Act for the assessment years 2010-11 to 13-14. It is appropriate to refer relevant part of the assessment order in para

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKESH JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain in the hand of Shri Rajendra Agarwal, no other incriminating material either found or referred or is the basis of the addition mode by the AO while framing the assessment under section 153A of the Act for the assessment years 2010-11 to 13-14. It is appropriate to refer relevant part of the assessment order in para

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKUT BEHARI AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain in the hand of Shri Rajendra Agarwal, no other incriminating material either found or referred or is the basis of the addition mode by the AO while framing the assessment under section 153A of the Act for the assessment years 2010-11 to 13-14. It is appropriate to refer relevant part of the assessment order in para

ACIT,CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI RAMESH KUMAR MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain in the hand of Shri Rajendra Agarwal, no other incriminating material either found or referred or is the basis of the addition mode by the AO while framing the assessment under section 153A of the Act for the assessment years 2010-11 to 13-14. It is appropriate to refer relevant part of the assessment order in para

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKESH JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain in the hand of Shri Rajendra Agarwal, no other incriminating material either found or referred or is the basis of the addition mode by the AO while framing the assessment under section 153A of the Act for the assessment years 2010-11 to 13-14. It is appropriate to refer relevant part of the assessment order in para

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SUNITA AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain in the hand of Shri Rajendra Agarwal, no other incriminating material either found or referred or is the basis of the addition mode by the AO while framing the assessment under section 153A of the Act for the assessment years 2010-11 to 13-14. It is appropriate to refer relevant part of the assessment order in para

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKUT BEHARI AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain in the hand of Shri Rajendra Agarwal, no other incriminating material either found or referred or is the basis of the addition mode by the AO while framing the assessment under section 153A of the Act for the assessment years 2010-11 to 13-14. It is appropriate to refer relevant part of the assessment order in para

ACIT,CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI RAMESH KUMAR MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain in the hand of Shri Rajendra Agarwal, no other incriminating material either found or referred or is the basis of the addition mode by the AO while framing the assessment under section 153A of the Act for the assessment years 2010-11 to 13-14. It is appropriate to refer relevant part of the assessment order in para

RAM SHRAN KATTA, 257, KATTA STREET, JAIN MANDIR WALI GALI, DURGAPURA, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD-6(4), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

158 (Calcutta) in which it\nwas held that:\n\"....For the aforesaid reasons, we are of the opinion that the valuation by the\ndepartmental valuation officer, contemplated under Section 50C, is required to\navoid miscarriage of justice. The legislature did not intend that the capital gain

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKUT BEHARI AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

capital gain made u/s 68 of the Act and also deleted the disallowance of addition of commission u/s 69C of the Act. Against the said relief granted by the CIT(A) to the assessee, the revenue has preferred an appeal before us on the grounds as mentioned here in above paras. 8. Before, we deal the appeal of the revenue

ACIT, C.C. -4, JAIPUR vs. MAVERICK COMMODITY BROKERS PVT. LTD., JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

capital gain made u/s 68 of the Act and also deleted the disallowance of addition of commission u/s 69C of the Act. Against the said relief granted by the CIT(A) to the assessee, the revenue has preferred an appeal before us on the grounds as mentioned here in above paras. 8. Before, we deal the appeal of the revenue

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SUNITA AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

capital gain made u/s 68 of the Act and also deleted the disallowance of addition of commission u/s 69C of the Act. Against the said relief granted by the CIT(A) to the assessee, the revenue has preferred an appeal before us on the grounds as mentioned here in above paras. 8. Before, we deal the appeal of the revenue

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SUNITA AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

capital gain made u/s 68 of the Act and also deleted the disallowance of addition of commission u/s 69C of the Act. Against the said relief granted by the CIT(A) to the assessee, the revenue has preferred an appeal before us on the grounds as mentioned here in above paras. 8. Before, we deal the appeal of the revenue

ACIT, CC-4, , JAIPUR vs. SHRI ANSHUL JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

capital gain made u/s 68 of the Act and also deleted the disallowance of addition of commission u/s 69C of the Act. Against the said relief granted by the CIT(A) to the assessee, the revenue has preferred an appeal before us on the grounds as mentioned here in above paras. 8. Before, we deal the appeal of the revenue

RAM SHARAN KATTA, 257, KATTA STREET, JAIN MANDIR WALI GALI, DURGAPURA, JAIPUR,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD-6(4), JAIPUR, WARD-6(4), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

158 (Calcutta) in which it\nwas held that:\n\"....For the aforesaid reasons, we are of the opinion that the valuation by the\ndepartmental valuation officer, contemplated under Section 50C, is required to\navoid miscarriage of justice. The legislature did not intend that the capital gain

SHRI SATISH CHANDRA KATTA,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR

158 (Calcutta) in which it was held that “....For the\naforesaid reasons, we are of the opinion that the valuation by the departmental\nvaluation officer, contemplated under Section 50C, is required to avoid miscarriage of\njustice. The legislature did not intend that the capital gain

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: or at the time of hearing of this appeal.

Section 80IA(8), the word "OR" is missing in provisions of Section 80A(6) of the ACIT vs. Shree Cement Ltd. Act. It is noted that as per provisions of Section 80A(6), if any goods or services whether sold or acquired falls within the category specified domestic transactions of Section 92BA then in such case it is mandatory