INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. MUKESH KUMAR SONI, JAIPUR

In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the cross

Bench: Moving Towards The Facts Of The Case We Would Like To Mention

capital gain. In the result, impugned notice is quashed. Petition is disposed of. In view of the aforesaid submissions the Hon’ble ITAT is requested to quashed the proceedings initiated under section 148/148A. Cross objection Ground No. 2 In the facts and circumstances of the case the learned CIT Appeals erred in not quashing the assessment order which has been

RAGHAV COMMODITIES,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 6(2), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed as indicated

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

Capital Services Private Limited and Padam Raj Agarwal HUF at substantial price difference (lower) in less than three minutes resulting in artificial volume in the market clearly 7 Raghav Commodities vs. ITO indicating that the loss claimed by the appellant is a pre-planned bogus fictitious loss suffered to evade tax liability in connivance with the above mentioned parties

SUSHILA CHOUDHARY,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

144B of the Income Tax\nAct, 1961 [ for short “Act”] by the National Faceless Assessment\nCentre [ for short ld. AO.]\n2. The assessee has marched this appeal on the following\ngrounds:-\n\"1. The Id. AO erred in law as well as on the facts of the present case in\ninitiating reassessment proceedings u/s 148 of the Income