ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SAROJ PARWAL, JAIPUR

Capital Gain exempt under section 10(38) in the return filed for this year. The return was processed under section 143(1) and no notice under section 143(2) was issued and hence assessment under section 143(1) completed. 2.1. Thereafter, there was a search and seizure

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. M/S BITTHAL DAS PARWAL, HUF, JAIPUR

Capital Gain exempt under section 10(38) in the return filed for this year. The return was processed under section 143(1) and no notice under section 143(2) was issued and hence assessment under section 143(1) completed. 2.1. Thereafter, there was a search and seizure

DCIT, CC-3, JAIPUR vs. SMT. JYOTI FALOR, JAIPUR

Capital Gain exempt under section 10(38) in the return filed for this year. The return was processed under section 143(1) and no notice under section 143(2) was issued and hence assessment under section 143(1) completed. 2.1. Thereafter, there was a search and seizure

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR vs. M/S HARI NARAIN PARWAL, HUF, JAIPUR

Capital Gain exempt under section 10(38) in the return filed for this year. The return was processed under section 143(1) and no notice under section 143(2) was issued and hence assessment under section 143(1) completed. 2.1. Thereafter, there was a search and seizure

DCIT, C.C. -03, JAIPUR vs. SHRI TEJENDER KUMAR FALOR, JAIPUR

Capital Gain exempt under section 10(38) in the return filed for this year. The return was processed under section 143(1) and no notice under section 143(2) was issued and hence assessment under section 143(1) completed. 2.1. Thereafter, there was a search and seizure

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. ASHA JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain which was found during the course of search and seizure. Thus, except the material disclosing the long term

ACIT,CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI RAMESH KUMAR MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain which was found during the course of search and seizure. Thus, except the material disclosing the long term

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKUT BEHARI AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain which was found during the course of search and seizure. Thus, except the material disclosing the long term

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKESH JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain which was found during the course of search and seizure. Thus, except the material disclosing the long term

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SANGEETA MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain which was found during the course of search and seizure. Thus, except the material disclosing the long term

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKUT BEHARI AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain which was found during the course of search and seizure. Thus, except the material disclosing the long term

ACIT,CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI RAMESH KUMAR MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain which was found during the course of search and seizure. Thus, except the material disclosing the long term

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SUNITA AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain which was found during the course of search and seizure. Thus, except the material disclosing the long term

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKESH JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

capital gain which was found during the course of search and seizure. Thus, except the material disclosing the long term

BITTHAL DAS PARWAL,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3 , JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Him. 2. In This Appeal, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds: -

search and seizure action on account of the bogus long term capital gain whereby the disallowance of the exemption under

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, KOTA vs. SMT. JYOTI AGARWAL, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

capital gain shown in his ITR as his undisclosed income but such undisclosed income in not based on any documents found as a result of search or evidences. During the course of search & seizure

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTA vs. SHRI AJAY AGARWAL, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

capital gain shown in his ITR as his undisclosed income but such undisclosed income in not based on any documents found as a result of search or evidences. During the course of search & seizure

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTA vs. SMT. INDIRA AGRAWAL, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

capital gain shown in his ITR as his undisclosed income but such undisclosed income in not based on any documents found as a result of search or evidences. During the course of search & seizure