SHRI ASHNUTH GOYAL,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, WARD -1(3), JAIPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 276/JPR/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur03 Apr 2023AY 2015-16
Bench: Him. Thus, The Addition Of Rs. 30,04,864/- So Uphold Deserves To Be Deleted. Shri Ashnuth Goyal Vs Acit, Ward 1(3), Jaipur
For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, JCIT
Section 10(38)Section 68
stocks gave rise to huge capital gains in a short period does not mean that the transaction is “bogus” if the documentation and evidences cannot be faulted.
Surya Prakash Toshniwal HUF vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) (Caselaws
Paper Book Pages 85-93)
SHRI ASHNUTH GOYAL VS ACIT, WARD 1(3), JAIPUR
Bogus capital gains from penny