BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

303 results for “capital gains”+ Carry Forward of Lossesclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,512Delhi1,216Kolkata785Ahmedabad641Bangalore494Chennai442Jaipur303Pune246Chandigarh219Hyderabad190Raipur124Cochin116Nagpur100Surat96Indore93Karnataka88Rajkot86Cuttack73Visakhapatnam67Lucknow57Guwahati54Amritsar52Calcutta43SC27Ranchi22Telangana14Jodhpur13Panaji13Jabalpur11Agra10Kerala8Patna7Varanasi7Allahabad6Dehradun6Rajasthan2Orissa2Himachal Pradesh1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Andhra Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)69Addition to Income65Section 26344Section 13242Section 6841Section 14837Section 153A33Section 14732Section 80I27Deduction

SMT. VINEETA KUMAR,C-13, DEEPAK MARG, M.D. RAOD, JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-7(1), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 317/JPR/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur18 Oct 2022AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Ms Monisha Choudhary (JCIT)
Section 10(38)Section 250

carried forward. Thus, long term capital gain of Rs.3,38,161/- declared during the year under consideration is allowable to be set off against brought forward long term capital loss

NEERU MOHAN NAGPAL,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ITO WARD 2(3)

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 151/JPR/2022[2016-17]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 303 · Page 1 of 16

...
27
Disallowance23
Search & Seizure22
ITAT Jaipur
03 May 2024
AY 2016-17
For Appellant: MS. Pallavi Khuntenta, (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Anoop Singh (Addl. CIT)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 2(47)

gain. The total Capital Loss of Rs.\n38,58,099/- which was set of to the extent of Rs. 27,90,552/- and balance\namount of Rs. 10,67,547/- was carried forward

ACIT,CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI RAMESH KUMAR MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

ITA 164/JPR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

carried out by the Investigation Wing of the department. He has read the statement of the persons whose statements are relied upon. He has stated that the fact that the SEBI and Investigation Wing of the department has given so much of the material on the issue of bogus long term capital gain including the report of the SIT report

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SUNITA AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

ITA 156/JPR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

carried out by the Investigation Wing of the department. He has read the statement of the persons whose statements are relied upon. He has stated that the fact that the SEBI and Investigation Wing of the department has given so much of the material on the issue of bogus long term capital gain including the report of the SIT report

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SANGEETA MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

ITA 160/JPR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

carried out by the Investigation Wing of the department. He has read the statement of the persons whose statements are relied upon. He has stated that the fact that the SEBI and Investigation Wing of the department has given so much of the material on the issue of bogus long term capital gain including the report of the SIT report

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKUT BEHARI AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

ITA 152/JPR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

carried out by the Investigation Wing of the department. He has read the statement of the persons whose statements are relied upon. He has stated that the fact that the SEBI and Investigation Wing of the department has given so much of the material on the issue of bogus long term capital gain including the report of the SIT report

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKESH JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

ITA 161/JPR/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

carried out by the Investigation Wing of the department. He has read the statement of the persons whose statements are relied upon. He has stated that the fact that the SEBI and Investigation Wing of the department has given so much of the material on the issue of bogus long term capital gain including the report of the SIT report

ACIT,CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI RAMESH KUMAR MANTRI, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

ITA 165/JPR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

carried out by the Investigation Wing of the department. He has read the statement of the persons whose statements are relied upon. He has stated that the fact that the SEBI and Investigation Wing of the department has given so much of the material on the issue of bogus long term capital gain including the report of the SIT report

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKESH JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

ITA 162/JPR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

carried out by the Investigation Wing of the department. He has read the statement of the persons whose statements are relied upon. He has stated that the fact that the SEBI and Investigation Wing of the department has given so much of the material on the issue of bogus long term capital gain including the report of the SIT report

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. ASHA JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

ITA 159/JPR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

carried out by the Investigation Wing of the department. He has read the statement of the persons whose statements are relied upon. He has stated that the fact that the SEBI and Investigation Wing of the department has given so much of the material on the issue of bogus long term capital gain including the report of the SIT report

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKUT BEHARI AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed and the cross

ITA 153/JPR/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

carried out by the Investigation Wing of the department. He has read the statement of the persons whose statements are relied upon. He has stated that the fact that the SEBI and Investigation Wing of the department has given so much of the material on the issue of bogus long term capital gain including the report of the SIT report

BITTHAL DAS PARWAL,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3 , JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1348/JPR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Him. 2. In This Appeal, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds: -

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma, C.A. &For Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, Addl.CIT
Section 132(1)Section 139Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

gain was not disclosed in the original return of income although he was legally bound to do the same, Similarly, no loss was claimed in original return of income against LTCG. Thus, the assessee has tried to reduce his taxable income by claiming the above loss from LTCG. Also, the assessee has not challenged the above disallowance before

SHRI NARESH JAIN,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 159/JPR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 Aug 2020AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Vijay Goyal, CAFor Respondent: Shri K.C. Gupta, JCIT
Section 45Section 48Section 54F

carried forward as long term capital loss for the current year A.Y 2015-16. The AO firstly set off the long term capital loss suffered from shares from the long term capital gain

ACIT, CC-4, , JAIPUR vs. SHRI ANSHUL JAIN, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 163/JPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri P.R. Meena (Pr.CIT)
Section 115BSection 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

carried along with search in other person for the purpose of making assessment u/s158BB. Provisions of 158BB are Pari Materia to section153A. The Delhi High court in PCIT Vs Kabul Chawla in para37(iv)observed as under: “iv. Although Section 153A does not say that additions should be strictly made on the basis of evidence found in the course

ACIT, C.C. -4, JAIPUR vs. MAVERICK COMMODITY BROKERS PVT. LTD., JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 27/JPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri P.R. Meena (Pr.CIT)
Section 115BSection 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

carried along with search in other person for the purpose of making assessment u/s158BB. Provisions of 158BB are Pari Materia to section153A. The Delhi High court in PCIT Vs Kabul Chawla in para37(iv)observed as under: “iv. Although Section 153A does not say that additions should be strictly made on the basis of evidence found in the course

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SUNITA AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 157/JPR/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri P.R. Meena (Pr.CIT)
Section 115BSection 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

carried along with search in other person for the purpose of making assessment u/s158BB. Provisions of 158BB are Pari Materia to section153A. The Delhi High court in PCIT Vs Kabul Chawla in para37(iv)observed as under: “iv. Although Section 153A does not say that additions should be strictly made on the basis of evidence found in the course

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SMT. SUNITA AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 158/JPR/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri P.R. Meena (Pr.CIT)
Section 115BSection 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

carried along with search in other person for the purpose of making assessment u/s158BB. Provisions of 158BB are Pari Materia to section153A. The Delhi High court in PCIT Vs Kabul Chawla in para37(iv)observed as under: “iv. Although Section 153A does not say that additions should be strictly made on the basis of evidence found in the course

ACIT, CC-4, JAIPUR vs. SHRI MUKUT BEHARI AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 155/JPR/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri P.R. Meena (Pr.CIT)
Section 115BSection 127Section 132Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 153ASection 68Section 69C

carried along with search in other person for the purpose of making assessment u/s158BB. Provisions of 158BB are Pari Materia to section153A. The Delhi High court in PCIT Vs Kabul Chawla in para37(iv)observed as under: “iv. Although Section 153A does not say that additions should be strictly made on the basis of evidence found in the course

SUMIT GOEL,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , JAIPUR

In the result,the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 8/JPR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri S.L. Poddar(Adv.)&For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary(Addl.CIT)
Section 10(38)Section 147Section 148Section 56Section 68Section 69C

carried forward loss against long term capital gain earned by the assessee which tantamount to double addition. In the computation

RAHUL KASLIWAL,JAIPUR vs. ITO, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1036/JPR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur17 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rajendra Sisodia, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Chaudhary, JCIT D/R
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 68Section 69C

carry forward of business loss. Thus, it is clear that the assessee neither had any capital loss which could have been adjusted against any capital gain