Search: bogus purchases

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 43Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata6 Jaipur3 Hyderabad2 Bangalore2 Chandigarh1 Chennai1 Jodhpur1 Delhi1

Key Topics

Section 1485 Section 1444 Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 69A3 Addition to Income3 Section 143(2)2 Section 1472 Section 37(1)2 Section 44A2

MUKESH SONI,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(1), JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 46/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Dheeraj Borad (CA)For Respondent: Smt Monisha Choudhary (Addl. CIT) a

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 69A

purchaser. 16. It is further submitted that treatment of cash deposit of Rs. 32,71,000 (Out of total cash deposit of Rs. 33,71,000 during demonetization period) as unexplained income and consequentially adding it in the total income of assessee u/s. 68 of the IT Act is in utter disregard of provisions of section

MUKESH SONI,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(1), JAIPUR

MUKESH SONI,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(1), JAIPUR

SH. HARI PRAKASH GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

SH. HARI PRAKASH GUPTA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(2), JAIPUR, JAIPUR