BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi18Chennai5Kolkata5Indore3Jaipur2Cuttack2Mumbai2Pune1

Key Topics

Section 269S6Section 271D4Section 1472Section 692Section 1322

SH. ASHOK KUMAR PORWAL,JHALAWAR vs. JCIT, RANGE-1, KOTA, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 572/JPR/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur19 Dec 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Smt Monisha Chaudhary (Addl. CIT)
Section 133(6)Section 147Section 269SSection 271D

271D of the Act. The appellant has stated that the AO did not verify the entry. But the entry is visible on the balance sheet of the appellant and no more further verification is required as a narration of the entry explains it all. 6 Sh. Ashok Kumar Porwal vs. JCIT 1. The source of income of appellant was salary

VIVEKANDA SHIKSHA SAMITI,PALWAS ROAD, SIKAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 203/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 Jul 2024AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Anil Dhaka (CIT)
Section 115BSection 127Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 69

bogus.\nTherefore, in my considered view, the addition has been made purely on the\nbasis of suspicion. Such action of authorities below cannot be affirmed. I,\ntherefore, direct the AO to delete the impugned addition. Thus, ground raised by\nthe assessee in this appeal is allowed.\"\nKrishna Agarwal Vs. ITO (2021) 63 CCH 0048 (Jodh.) (Trib)\nPara