BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 244(1)(aa)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi20Chandigarh11Chennai10Nagpur6Jaipur3Kolkata2Patna1Jodhpur1Mumbai1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 14710Section 145(3)4Disallowance3Section 1512Survey u/s 133A2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2, JAIPUR vs. M/S. ANGEL INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the

ITA 761/JPR/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur05 Dec 2018AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain &For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta
Section 147Section 151

purchase and sale and creating artificial ITA 464 & 761/JP/2018_ 53 M/s Angel Infrastructure P Ltd. Vs DCIT short term capital loss was a preconceived design to avoid tax liability on the capital gain arising from sale of shares as well as other income. The assessee instead of transferring the shares to the group concern without any consideration would have requested

M/S ANGEL INFRASTRUCTURE (P) LTD.,JAIPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and the

ITA 464/JPR/2018[2009-10]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jaipur
05 Dec 2018
AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain &For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta
Section 147Section 151

purchase and sale and creating artificial ITA 464 & 761/JP/2018_ 53 M/s Angel Infrastructure P Ltd. Vs DCIT short term capital loss was a preconceived design to avoid tax liability on the capital gain arising from sale of shares as well as other income. The assessee instead of transferring the shares to the group concern without any consideration would have requested

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, BEAWAR vs. SHRI MAN MOHAN MITTAL, BEAWAR

In the result, the cross objection so raised by the assessee is rejected

ITA 764/JPR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Feb 2019AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Vinod Gupta (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri J.C. Kulhari (JCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 145(3)Section 40A(3)

purchases are sought to be treated as bogus or disproved and consequently proceeds to make addition us/ 69C of the Act without correspondingly adjusting the sales figure specially when the liabilities (creditors) recorded in the balance 12 ITA No. 764/JP/2018 & CO No. 24/JP/2018 ITO vs. Shri Man Mohan Mittal sheet are also disbelieved and added back as income, then