Search: bogus purchases

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 194Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi30 Mumbai28 Kolkata16 Ahmedabad9 Hyderabad5 Cuttack5 Jaipur3 Amritsar2 Rajkot2 Chandigarh1 Bangalore1 Pune1

Key Topics

Section 26310 Section 1474 Section 404 Section 1443 Section 1483 TDS3 Deduction2 Addition to Income2 Disallowance2

SHRI VIRENDRA KUMAR JAIN,TONK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TONK

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 970/JPR/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur23 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Or At The Time Of Hearing.”

For Appellant: Shri S.L. Poddar (Advocate)For Respondent: Shri K.C. Gupta (JCIT)

Section 40

bogus expenses on account of commission paid by the assessee to retailers. 3. The assessee craves your indulgence to add, amend or alter all or any grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing.” Ground No. 1 is regarding disallowance made under section 40(a)(ia) in respect of the commission/discount given to the retailers. 2. The assessee

SHIV VEGPRO PRIVATE LIMITED ,KOTA vs. PCIT-UDAIPUR , UDAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1014/JPR/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed

SHRI VIRENDRA KUMAR JAIN,TONK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TONK

SHIV VEGPRO PRIVATE LIMITED ,KOTA vs. PCIT-UDAIPUR , UDAIPUR

SHRI VIRENDRA KUMAR JAIN,TONK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TONK

SHIV VEGPRO PRIVATE LIMITED ,KOTA vs. PCIT-UDAIPUR , UDAIPUR

APOORVA SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-6(4), JAIPUR