DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

Section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

SAKET AGARWAL,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 2(3) JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

1) TMI 157 - ITAT DELHI]has held that:AO in the final assessment order however continued to treat the purchases of fabric from STPL as bogus and refused the claim made under Section

JEWELS EMPORIUM A LEGACY,JAIPUR vs. ACIT,CC-1, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

1,50,00,000/-), Mumbai. These firms were controlled by Shri Praveen Jain who was the key person of these companies engaged in providing entries for bogus purchases. During the course of search of premises of Mr. Praveen Jain, many incriminating documents were found and seized. Statements of various key persons including Shri Praveen Jain were recorded under section

ITO, WAR-4(1), JAIPUR vs. SHRI AMIT AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am

section 41(1) without proving that liability ceased to exist and that too in the year under consideration. Nothing has been brought on record to show that some benefit has actually accrued to the assessee during the year under consideration. We observe that the case laws relied on by the ld DR are not applicable in the facts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUNDER DAS SONKIYA, JAIPUR

In the result, both appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

section 145(3) is invoked in this case. In view of the above discussion it is held that purchase of Rs. 1,73,34,424/- from M/s Aadilmpex, M/s Sun Diam, M/s Arihant Exports and M/s KriyaImpex Pvt Ltd. as discussed in above paras are bogus

LATE SHRI JITENDRA NAGAR THROUGH HIS L/R SMT. DEEPIKA NAGAR,BARAN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD BARAN, BARAN

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: The Date Of Hearing.”

Section 148 for AY 2015-16 is invalid, rendering the subsequent assessment proceedings null and void. 4.7 Hon’ble ITAT, Raipur Bench in the case of DCIT v. Vinay Agrawal[2025] 2 TMI 891 order dated 17.02.2025after considering theaforesaid judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal (supra) has held: Reopening of assessment - Period of limitation - Bogus purchases

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1(1), JAIPUR vs. KIRAN INFRA ISPAT LIMITED, JAIPUR

Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Business expenditure -\nAllowability of (Bogus purchase) - Certain portion of purchases made

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUNDER DAS SONKIYA, JAIPUR

In the result, both appeals of the revenue are dismissed

section 145(3) is invoked in this case. In view of\nthe above discussion it is held that purchase of Rs. 1,73,34,424/- from M/s Aadilmpex,\nM/s Sun Diam, M/s Arihant Exports and M/s Kriyalmpex Pvt Ltd. as discussed in above\nparas are bogus

VISION JEWELLERS,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 1.8. It may be pointed that before penalty could be imposed on the assessee firm, the ld. AO was duty bound, in the entirety of circumstances, to point, with concrete evidences, to the conclusion that assessee firmmade purchases which were bogus