DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR , JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. VIPUL BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. USHA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUBHASH CHANDRA BANKA, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. TRILOK DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SARITA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

Section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. PRIYA DEWAN, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. ANIMESH AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SNEHLATA AGARWAL, SIKAR

In the result, the appeals of the revenue in ITA No

section 132(1) of the Act was carried out on 13-06-\n2019 at the various premises of Dewan Group. The assessee derives\nincome from Business or Profession and Other Source during the year\nunder consideration. Consequent to search action, notice u/s.153A of the\nAct was issued to the assessee on 04-03-2021 which was duly served. In\nresponse

SAKET AGARWAL,JAIPUR vs. ITO WARD 2(3) JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

1) TMI 157 - ITAT DELHI]has held that:AO in the final assessment order however continued to treat the purchases of fabric from STPL as bogus and refused the claim made under Section

JEWELS EMPORIUM A LEGACY,JAIPUR vs. ACIT,CC-1, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

1,50,00,000/-), Mumbai. These firms were controlled by Shri Praveen Jain who was the key person of these companies engaged in providing entries for bogus purchases. During the course of search of premises of Mr. Praveen Jain, many incriminating documents were found and seized. Statements of various key persons including Shri Praveen Jain were recorded under section

ITO, WAR-4(1), JAIPUR vs. SHRI AMIT AGARWAL, JAIPUR

In the result, this appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am

section 41(1) without proving that liability ceased to exist and that too in the year under consideration. Nothing has been brought on record to show that some benefit has actually accrued to the assessee during the year under consideration. We observe that the case laws relied on by the ld DR are not applicable in the facts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. SUNDER DAS SONKIYA, JAIPUR

In the result, both appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

section 145(3) is invoked in this case. In view of the above discussion it is held that purchase of Rs. 1,73,34,424/- from M/s Aadilmpex, M/s Sun Diam, M/s Arihant Exports and M/s KriyaImpex Pvt Ltd. as discussed in above paras are bogus

SMT. INDIRA AGRAWAL,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTA

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA No

1) of the Act is not automatic but the AO has to take a decision by considering all the conditions to be satisfied as provided under the said section. Since the disclosure and surrender of the amount does not fall in the definition of undisclosed income, therefore, the penalty under section 271AAB is not leviable in the case

SHRI VASUDEV AGRAWAL,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the revenue

1) of the Act is not automatic but the AO has to take a decision by considering all the conditions to be satisfied as provided under the said section. Since the disclosure and surrender of the amount does not fall in the definition of undisclosed income, therefore, the penalty under section 271AAB is not leviable in the case

SHRI AJAY AGARWAL,KOTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOTA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed and the appeal of the revenue

1) of the Act is not automatic but the AO has to take a decision by considering all the conditions to be satisfied as provided under the said section. Since the disclosure and surrender of the amount does not fall in the definition of undisclosed income, therefore, the penalty under section 271AAB is not leviable in the case