BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ TP Methodclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore345Mumbai342Delhi307Chennai117Kolkata52Hyderabad34Ahmedabad22Pune20Chandigarh14Jaipur6Karnataka4Rajkot4Visakhapatnam3Indore3Cuttack2Kerala1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 80I31Section 8016Section 143(3)9Section 115J9Section 144B(1)(xvi)7Transfer Pricing6Deduction6Disallowance6Section 1435Section 144B

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2, AJMER, AJMER

ITA 497/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Feb 2024AY 2017-18
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 144B(1)(xvi)Section 80Section 80I

method adopted by the assessee but rejected the benchmarking of the respondent and made an adjustment of Rs. 90,55,18,397/- on account of transfer of solid waste by revising PSM (Profit Split Method) to 64% against the PSM of 79.73% adopted by the assessee on the basis of FAR analysis adopted by the Revenue

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AJMER vs. SHREE CEMENT LTD, BEAWAR

Accordingly, the same is dismissed

2
ITA 490/JPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Feb 2024AY 2016-17
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 144B(1)(xvi)Section 80Section 80I

method adopted by the assessee but rejected the benchmarking of the respondent and made an adjustment of Rs. 90,55,18,397/- on account of transfer of solid waste by revising PSM (Profit Split Method) to 64% against the PSM of 79.73% adopted by the assessee on the basis of FAR analysis adopted by the Revenue

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2, AJMER, AJMER

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 496/JPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Feb 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: or at the time of hearing of this appeal.

For Appellant: Sh. Dilip B Desai(C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Alka Gautam (CIT) (V.H) &
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144B(1)(xvi)Section 80Section 80I

TP adjustments. The adjustment so made are as under: a) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on power undertakings for an amount of Rs. 2,70,66,00,914/-. b) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on Solid Waste Management System for an amount of Rs. 90,55,18,397/-. c) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on Water Treatment

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 500/JPR/2023[215-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Feb 2024

Bench: or at the time of hearing of this appeal.

For Appellant: Sh. Dilip B Desai(C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Alka Gautam (CIT) (V.H) &
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144B(1)(xvi)Section 80Section 80I

TP adjustments. The adjustment so made are as under: a) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on power undertakings for an amount of Rs. 2,70,66,00,914/-. b) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on Solid Waste Management System for an amount of Rs. 90,55,18,397/-. c) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on Water Treatment

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AJMER vs. SHREE CEMENT LTD, BEAWAR

ITA 489/JPR/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Feb 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Sh. Dilip B Desai(C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Alka Gautam (CIT) (V.H) &
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 144B(1)(xvi)Section 80Section 80I

TP adjustments. The\nadjustment so made are as under:\na) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on power undertakings for an\namount of Rs. 2,70,66,00,914/-.\nb) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on Solid Waste Management\nSystem for an amount of Rs. 90,55,18,397/-.\nc) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on Water Treatment

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AJMER

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 152/JPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur07 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & HON’BLE SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT
Section 115JSection 250Section 32(1)(ii)Section 80Section 80I

TDS amounting to Rs. 7,99,142/- as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the I.T Act. 22. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee during the assessment year under appeal had paid interest of Rs. 7,99,142/- on late deposit of TDS, which has been added back in the computation of income while computing