BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ TP Methodclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore344Mumbai300Delhi294Chennai111Kolkata46Ahmedabad41Pune40Hyderabad34Chandigarh14Indore11Jaipur5Visakhapatnam5Rajkot4Karnataka4Cuttack3Cochin3Kerala1Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 80I16Section 805Section 115J5Disallowance5Section 143(3)4Transfer Pricing3Deduction3Depreciation3Section 1432Section 144B(1)(xvi)

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2, AJMER, AJMER

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 496/JPR/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Feb 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: or at the time of hearing of this appeal.

For Appellant: Sh. Dilip B Desai(C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Alka Gautam (CIT) (V.H) &
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144B(1)(xvi)Section 80Section 80I

TP adjustments. The adjustment so made are as under: a) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on power undertakings for an amount of Rs. 2,70,66,00,914/-. b) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on Solid Waste Management System for an amount of Rs. 90,55,18,397/-. c) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on Water Treatment

2
Section 144B2
Section 14A2

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 500/JPR/2023[215-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Feb 2024

Bench: or at the time of hearing of this appeal.

For Appellant: Sh. Dilip B Desai(C.A.)For Respondent: Sh. Alka Gautam (CIT) (V.H) &
Section 115JSection 143Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144B(1)(xvi)Section 80Section 80I

TP adjustments. The adjustment so made are as under: a) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on power undertakings for an amount of Rs. 2,70,66,00,914/-. b) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on Solid Waste Management System for an amount of Rs. 90,55,18,397/-. c) Reduction in claim u/s 80-IA on Water Treatment

SHREE CEMENT LIMITED,BEAWAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AJMER

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 152/JPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur07 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: HON’BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & HON’BLE SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Vijay Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Kumar, CIT
Section 115JSection 250Section 32(1)(ii)Section 80Section 80I

TDS amounting to Rs. 7,99,142/- as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the I.T Act. 22. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee during the assessment year under appeal had paid interest of Rs. 7,99,142/- on late deposit of TDS, which has been added back in the computation of income while computing

JCIT, RANG-2, KOTA vs. CHAMBAL FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED, KOTA

In the result, respective grounds of appeal are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 575/JPR/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur17 Oct 2018AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala (Adv.)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT)
Section 14A

TDS, there is no question of disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. In the result, ground no. 9 of revenue’s appeal is dismissed.” Ground no. 12 relating to donation to DAV Trust: “16. We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties, perused the material available on the record and the earlier orders passed

CHAMBAL FERTILISERS AND CHEMICALS LIMITED,KOTA vs. JCIT, KOTA

In the result, respective grounds of appeal are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 461/JPR/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur17 Oct 2018AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Percy Pardiwala (Adv.)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT)
Section 14A

TDS, there is no question of disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act. In the result, ground no. 9 of revenue’s appeal is dismissed.” Ground no. 12 relating to donation to DAV Trust: “16. We have heard the rival contentions of both the parties, perused the material available on the record and the earlier orders passed