BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 80Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai12Jaipur7Chandigarh6Bangalore5Kolkata5Pune2Visakhapatnam2Chennai1Karnataka1Ranchi1Varanasi1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 14819Section 271(1)(c)15Section 1479House Property6Deduction6Section 2745Section 139(4)5Penalty5Section 44A2Section 194H

AJOY SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 547/JPR/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

TDS provisions. Pertinently thus, tax was already deducted/paid\ninitially.\n2.2 A notice u/s 133(6) dated 12.03.2018 (PB 2) was issued to the assessee\nwhereby, certain information in support of the deduction claimed u/s 80U was\nrequired from the assessee (but, there is no mention of deductions claimed u/s\n80CCF, 80D, 80DD and 80G etc.). However, the given notice

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

2
Section 115B2
TDS2
ITA 546/JPR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

TDS provisions. Pertinently thus, tax was already deducted/paid\ninitially.\n2.2 A notice u/s 133(6) dated 12.03.2018 (PB 2) was issued to the assessee\nwhereby, certain information in support of the deduction claimed u/s 80U was\nrequired from the assessee (but, there is no mention of deductions claimed u/s\n80CCF, 80D, 80DD and 80G etc.). However, the given notice

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 543/JPR/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 80C

TDS provisions. Pertinently thus, tax was already deducted/paid\ninitially.\n2.2 A notice u/s 133(6) dated 12.03.2018 (PB 2) was issued to the assessee\nwhereby, certain information in support of the deduction claimed u/s 80U was\nrequired from the assessee (but, there is no mention of deductions claimed u/s\n80CCF, 80D, 80DD and 80G etc.). However, the given notice

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 545/JPR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

TDS provisions. Pertinently thus, tax was already deducted/paid\ninitially.\n2.2 A notice u/s 133(6) dated 12.03.2018 (PB 2) was issued to the assessee\nwhereby, certain information in support of the deduction claimed u/s 80U was\nrequired from the assessee (but, there is no mention of deductions claimed u/s\n80CCF, 80D, 80DD and 80G etc.). However, the given notice

AJOY SHARMA ,JAIPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

ITA 544/JPR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jul 2024AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary, Addl. CIT
Section 139(4)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

TDS provisions. Pertinently thus, tax was already deducted/paid\ninitially.\n2.2 A notice u/s 133(6) dated 12.03.2018 (PB 2) was issued to the assessee\nwhereby, certain information in support of the deduction claimed u/s 80U was\nrequired from the assessee (but, there is no mention of deductions claimed u/s\n80CCF, 80D, 80DD and 80G etc.). However, the given notice

MAYA RATHORE,JAIPUR vs. ASSESSING AUTHORITY, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 823/JPR/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2025AY 2023-24
For Appellant: Shri Vikash Rajvanshi, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Gautam Singh Choudhary, JCIT
Section 115BSection 139(1)Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 194HSection 250Section 44A

TDS of Rs.1,25,000 was duly deducted\nunder section 194H. Since income from Notus Tech Consulting Services Private Limited\nwas not received in the relevant AY 2023-24 but in next year i.e. was received in FY\n2023-24 and after calculating final income the assessee filed revised return on 25-12-\n2023 duly before the due date

LATE SH. SHEKHAR DHARIWAL THROUGH L/H SMT. NIKITA DHARIWAL,DHARIWAL BHAWAN, SHASTRI MARKET, KOTA vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), KOTA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 51/JPR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur02 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Mrs. Monisha Choudhary, Addl.CIT
Section 147Section 148

TDS of Rs. 2,42,339/- allowed in the processing of return / claimed in the return.’’ 2.1 Besides the above mentioned grounds of appeal in respective assessment years (supra), the ld. AR of the assessee vide letter dated 03-03-2023 prayed for LATE SHRI SHEKHAR DHARIWAL THRU: L/H SMT NIKITA DHARIWAL VS ITO, WARD-2(2), KOTA admission