BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 801Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai26Ahmedabad15Hyderabad9Pune8Delhi8Nagpur4Jaipur3Indore2Lucknow2Bangalore1Chennai1Jodhpur1Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 80I13Section 14A3Deduction3Disallowance3Section 143(3)2Section 402Section 801B2Section 115J2Addition to Income2

DCIT, CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. M/S. JOY SYNDICATE & ENCLAVE PVT. LTD. , JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 102/JPR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Sogani ( C.A.)For Respondent: Ms Runi Pal (Addl. CIT)a fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 14ASection 801Section 80I

section 80113(10) are applicable or not on the sale booked after the insertion of both these clauses. 5. The AO arrived the findings that the assessee company made investment in unquoted shares and Mutual Fund of Rs. 5,29,99,200/- but no expenditure has been debited to P/L account. Under the circumstances, the disallowance u/s 14A is calculated

SARAF EXPORTS,SARDARSHAHAR vs. ACIT, JHUNJHUNU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 104/JPR/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 Feb 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: None (Written submission)For Respondent: Ms Monisha Choudhary (Addl.CIT)
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 801BSection 80ISection 80L

section 40 (a) (ia) is illegal and against the law. The fact mention by the CIT(A) is not correct. 3. Ground That no amount was payable at the end of the accounting period, therefore, the addition sustain by the is illegal and against the law. 4. Ground That the amount of TDS was paid later on as such should

RAJASTHAN STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT & INVESTMENT CORP. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ACIT, JAIPUR

In the result, both set of cross appeals for the respective assessment years are disposed off with above directions

ITA 380/JPR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Mar 2018AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri P C ParwalFor Respondent: Shri Varindar Mehta (CIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 115JSection 14ASection 80I

section 37(1) of the Act. In the result, the ground of appeal is partly allowed. 4. In ground No.3, the assessee has challenged the action of ld CIT(A) in not allowing the claim of deduction u/s 80IA on other income other than on retention charges, unauthorised construction and transfer charges. In Revenue’s ground No. 5, the Revenue