BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 801Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai28Delhi8Pune8Ahmedabad5Nagpur4Hyderabad3Jaipur3Lucknow2Indore2Chennai1Kolkata1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 80I11Section 1483Section 143(3)2Section 402Section 801B2Section 1472Section 153A2Section 14A2Deduction2Disallowance

DCIT, CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR, JAIPUR vs. M/S. JOY SYNDICATE & ENCLAVE PVT. LTD. , JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 102/JPR/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur26 Sept 2022AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Sogani ( C.A.)For Respondent: Ms Runi Pal (Addl. CIT)a fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 14ASection 801Section 80I

section 80113(10) are applicable or not on the sale booked after the insertion of both these clauses. 5. The AO arrived the findings that the assessee company made investment in unquoted shares and Mutual Fund of Rs. 5,29,99,200/- but no expenditure has been debited to P/L account. Under the circumstances, the disallowance u/s 14A is calculated

SARAF EXPORTS,SARDARSHAHAR vs. ACIT, JHUNJHUNU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

2
Addition to Income2
ITA 104/JPR/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 Feb 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: None (Written submission)For Respondent: Ms Monisha Choudhary (Addl.CIT)
Section 143(3)Section 40Section 801BSection 80ISection 80L

section 40 (a) (ia) is illegal and against the law. The fact mention by the CIT(A) is not correct. 3. Ground That no amount was payable at the end of the accounting period, therefore, the addition sustain by the is illegal and against the law. 4. Ground That the amount of TDS was paid later on as such should

BRIJ BIHARI AGRAWAL,JAIPUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1 , JAIPUR

ITA 737/JPR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Aug 2024AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Tarun Mittal (C.A)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl. CIT)
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 153ASection 153C

TDS\nwas deducted there on\". From this it is also further corroborated that\nfigure of 2.4% as found in the seized pen drive pertains to extra interest\nhowever the argument of the assesse that the additional interest was\nnot paid has not been specifically accepted by the Hon'ble ITAT on\nmerits.\n5.8 On page 122 of the order