Search: TDS | BharatTax

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 271A(2)(k)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore28 Mumbai25 Karnataka21 Delhi21 Visakhapatnam5 Jaipur5 Pune3 Kolkata2 Nagpur2 Cuttack2 Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)4 Section 271C4 Addition to Income4 Section 403 Section 2743 Penalty3 Section 143(2)2 Section 271(1)2 Section 2712 Section 145(3)

STATE BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), JAIPUR

In the result, the penalty so levied under section 271C is hereby directed to be deleted

ITA 1135/JPR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur31 Dec 2018AY 2012-13

For Appellant: Smt. Neelam Ashok (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri J.C. Kulhari (JCIT) a

Section 10(5)Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271C

k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A)-3, Jaipur dated 27.08.2018 for Assessment Year 2012-13 wherein the assessee bank has challenged the sustenance of penalty levied by the AO U/s 271C of the I.T. Act. 2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that

STATE BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), JAIPUR

STATE BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), JAIPUR

GOVINDAM BRJ INFRA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT CIR-6,JPR, JAIPUR

DHANRAJ SETHIA,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1

GOVIND SAINI,JAIPUR vs. ITO, JAIPUR

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, JAIPUR vs. INDU RATHORE, JAIPUR