BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

39 results for “TDS”+ Section 200A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Pune678Chennai565Patna466Indore415Bangalore398Delhi356Cochin323Mumbai214Nagpur122Visakhapatnam84Hyderabad58Dehradun48Cuttack46Kolkata40Jaipur39Jabalpur38Surat31Amritsar28Karnataka27Raipur23Lucknow15Rajkot15Ahmedabad12Allahabad12Panaji11Agra10Jodhpur7Guwahati6Chandigarh5Ranchi4Kerala2

Key Topics

Section 234E121Section 200A77TDS39Section 200A(1)28Condonation of Delay22Section 121Section 23412Section 20011Penalty10Section 194

SPECIAL JUDGE COURT SC/ST,AJMER vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), AJMER

In the result, the ground of appeal is partly allowed

ITA 1086/JPR/2019[2014-15 (1ST QTR.)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur28 Jan 2021
For Appellant: Shri Devang Gargieya (ITP)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary
Section 1Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. The hearing of the appeal was concluded through video conference in view of the prevailing situation of Covid-19 Pandemic. 3. During the course of hearing, the ld. AR submitted that the assessee filled its TDS return (Form 24Q) for the 1st quarter for F.Y. 2013-14 on 11th October, 2017, for which the due date was 31st July

RASHTRIYA MILITARY SCHOOL,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), AJMER

Showing 1–20 of 39 · Page 1 of 2

7
Section 200A(1)(c)6
Deduction2

In the result, the ground of appeal is partly allowed

ITA 988/JPR/2019[2013-14 ( 2nd-Qtr.)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur22 Jan 2020
For Appellant: Sh. Mahendra Gargieya (Adv) &For Respondent: Smt. Runi Pal
Section 1Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

200A by ACIT-TDS levying late filing fees under section 234E of the Act. The Assessing officer was thus well within his jurisdiction to levy fees under section 234E of the Act. The contention of the ld AR is that since the TDS statement pertains to the period i.e for the financial year 2012-13(quarter 2

GOVERNEMNT SECONDARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL OFFICER TOOMLIKABAS, CHAKSU,CHAKSU vs. ACIT CPC TDS GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 964/JPR/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur24 Jun 2020AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Kr. Sharma (CA)For Respondent: Ms. Chanchal Meena (Addl.CIT)
Section 200ASection 234E

2) For the purposes of processing of statements under sub-section (1), the Board may make a scheme14 for centralised processing of statements of tax deducted at source to expeditiously determine the tax payable by, or the refund due to, the deductor as required under the said sub-section.] 11 ITA 964/JP/2019_ Govt. Secondary School Vs ACIT, CPC-TDS Section

INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3, JAIPUR vs. AJMER VIDHYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD., ASSISTANT ENGINEER (O&M), SIKAR

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed on account of low tax

ITA 595/JPR/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Aug 2020AY 2016-17
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. Rooni Pal (DCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 120Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 246A

200A(1) inserted by the Finance Act 2015 w.e.f 01.06.2015? 2. Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case and the law, the application of provisions of Section 234E by the Assessing Officer (TDS

INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS-3, JAIPUR vs. AJMER VIDHYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD., ASSISTANT ENGINEER (O &M) PUSHKAR, AJMER

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed on account of low tax

ITA 519/JPR/2019[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur14 Aug 2020AY 2017-18
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. Rooni Pal (DCIT) fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@
Section 120Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 246A

200A(1) inserted by the Finance Act 2015 w.e.f 01.06.2015? 2. Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case and the law, the application of provisions of Section 234E by the Assessing Officer (TDS

SHRI ANIL KUMAR MAHESHWARI,AJMER vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the ground of appeal is partly allowed

ITA 762/JPR/2017[2015-16 ( 26q, 4TH QTR)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur23 Jan 2019
For Appellant: Shri Devang Gargieya (ITP) &For Respondent: Smt. Anuradha (JCIT)
Section 1Section 2Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee filed his TDS return in Form No. 26Q for the quarter ended 31st March, 2015 on 23rd September, 2015 for which the due date was 15th May, 2015. The TDS return was processed and the ACIT, TDS issued an intimation dated 26th September, 2015 U/s 200A

M/S AJMER THERMOTECH PVT. LTD.,AJMER vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the ground of appeal is partly allowed

ITA 763/JPR/2017[2015-16 924Q, 4TH QTR)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur23 Jan 2019
For Appellant: Shri Devang Gargieya (ITP)For Respondent: Smt. Anuradha (JCIT)
Section 1Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee filed its TDS return in Form No. 24Q for the quarter ended 31st March, 2015 on 12th M/s Ajmer Thermotech Pvt. Ltd., Ajmer Vs. ACIT, Ghaziabad September, 2015 for which the due date was 15th May, 2015. The TDS return was processed and ACIT, TDS issued an intimation

SHRI UTTAM CHAND GANGWAL,AJMER vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the ground of appeal is partly allowed

ITA 764/JPR/2017[2015-16 (26q, 4th Qtr.)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur23 Jan 2019
For Appellant: Shri Devang Gargieya (Adv.)For Respondent: Shri J. C. Kulhari (JCIT)
Section 1Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee filed his TDS return in Form No. 26Q for the quarter ended 31st March, 2015 on 22nd July, Shri Uttam Chand Gangwal, Ajmer Vs. ACIT, Ghaziabad 2015 for which the due date was 15th May, 2015. The TDS return was processed and the ACIT, TDS issued an intimation

MANISH GOVIND DANGI,UDIAPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE (INTL.TAX), JAIPUR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 118/JPR/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur17 Aug 2022AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Sh. Mukesh Soni (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (JCIT)
Section 194Section 194ISection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section Field 26A Paper Up to & 201(1A) Assessing including 2016- and/or Officer 17 40(a)(ia) (TDS)[1] CPC-TDS 26A Electronic 12[2] Up to & 200A

GOVERNMENT SECONDARY SCHOOL KUMHARIA,AJMER vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (CPC) (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 911/JPR/2017[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Apr 2022AY 2016-17
For Appellant: Shri Praveen Gurjar (C.A.)For Respondent: Ms Runi Pal (Addl.CIT) a
Section 190Section 200ASection 201Section 203Section 204Section 234Section 234ESection 285Section 32

section 200A OF IT ACT 1961 Levying late filing Fee of Rs 32700/- U/s 234 by ACIT, CPC(TDS) Ghaziabad(TDS return Relates to 24Q 3rd Qtr.) 2

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, NEEM KA THANA,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1121/JPR/2019[2013-14- 24Q-4]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

Section 200A(1) by Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Therefore, the assessee has an arguable case for those adjustment made by the AO in respect of the TDS quarterly statement of financial year 2013-14 and first quarter of financial year 2015-16. It is matter of the fact that the adjustment was made by the AO only while processing

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, DANTA RAMGARH,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1116/JPR/2019[2013-14 (24 Q-2)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

Section 200A(1) by Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Therefore, the assessee has an arguable case for those adjustment made by the AO in respect of the TDS quarterly statement of financial year 2013-14 and first quarter of financial year 2015-16. It is matter of the fact that the adjustment was made by the AO only while processing

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, NEEM KA THANA,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1119/JPR/2019[2013-14-24Q-2]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

Section 200A(1) by Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Therefore, the assessee has an arguable case for those adjustment made by the AO in respect of the TDS quarterly statement of financial year 2013-14 and first quarter of financial year 2015-16. It is matter of the fact that the adjustment was made by the AO only while processing

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, KHATUSHYAMJI,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1122/JPR/2019[2013-14-24Q-3]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

Section 200A(1) by Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Therefore, the assessee has an arguable case for those adjustment made by the AO in respect of the TDS quarterly statement of financial year 2013-14 and first quarter of financial year 2015-16. It is matter of the fact that the adjustment was made by the AO only while processing

XEN (O&M) AVVNL, DANTA RAMGARH,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1126/JPR/2019[2013-14 - 24 Q 4]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

Section 200A(1) by Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Therefore, the assessee has an arguable case for those adjustment made by the AO in respect of the TDS quarterly statement of financial year 2013-14 and first quarter of financial year 2015-16. It is matter of the fact that the adjustment was made by the AO only while processing

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, KANWAT ,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1113/JPR/2019[2016-17-24Q-4]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

Section 200A(1) by Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Therefore, the assessee has an arguable case for those adjustment made by the AO in respect of the TDS quarterly statement of financial year 2013-14 and first quarter of financial year 2015-16. It is matter of the fact that the adjustment was made by the AO only while processing

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, DANTA RAMGARH,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1117/JPR/2019[2013-14 (24 Q -3)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

Section 200A(1) by Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Therefore, the assessee has an arguable case for those adjustment made by the AO in respect of the TDS quarterly statement of financial year 2013-14 and first quarter of financial year 2015-16. It is matter of the fact that the adjustment was made by the AO only while processing

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, DANTA RAMGARH,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1118/JPR/2019[2013-14 (24Q - 4)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

Section 200A(1) by Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Therefore, the assessee has an arguable case for those adjustment made by the AO in respect of the TDS quarterly statement of financial year 2013-14 and first quarter of financial year 2015-16. It is matter of the fact that the adjustment was made by the AO only while processing

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, NEEM KA THANA,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1120/JPR/2019[2013-14-Q-3]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

Section 200A(1) by Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Therefore, the assessee has an arguable case for those adjustment made by the AO in respect of the TDS quarterly statement of financial year 2013-14 and first quarter of financial year 2015-16. It is matter of the fact that the adjustment was made by the AO only while processing

AEN (O&M) AVVNL, KANWAT ,SIKAR vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for

ITA 1110/JPR/2019[2016-17 (24Q-1)]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur25 Aug 2020
For Appellant: Shri Ankur Aalgia (C.A.)For Respondent: Miss Chanchal Meena (ACIT)
Section 1Section 200A(1)Section 234E

Section 200A(1) by Finance Act 2015 w.e.f. 01.06.2015. Therefore, the assessee has an arguable case for those adjustment made by the AO in respect of the TDS quarterly statement of financial year 2013-14 and first quarter of financial year 2015-16. It is matter of the fact that the adjustment was made by the AO only while processing