BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 192Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi20Chennai5Ahmedabad4Bangalore4Indore4Jaipur2Mumbai2Surat1Panaji1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)3Section 1923Section 44A2Section 192B2Section 1482TDS2Addition to Income2

RAHUL BHARGAVA PROP. KANDARP TRADERS,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4-5, JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 884/JPR/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Oct 2019AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Poonam Rai (DCIT)
Section 133(6)Section 192BSection 194CSection 194ISection 44A

TDS deducted by the company M/s. Kandarp Tradelinks and Services Pvt. Ltd. under section 192B on salary and the assessee

SHRI AJAY MATHUR,AHMEDABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6-2, JAIPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1041/JPR/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur16 Jan 2019AY 2008-09
For Appellant: Shri Ajay Mathur (Assessee)For Respondent: Shri Varinder Mehta (CIT-DR)
Section 139(1)Section 144Section 148Section 192Section 192BSection 271(1)(c)

192B of the Act and 192A. On appeal against the assessment order, the ld. CIT(A) found that there was a mistake in the 26AS whereby the salary of the assessee was Rs. 5,77,716/- and not Rs. 10,26,099/- as considered by the Assessing Officer. The ld. CIT(A) after taking correct amount of salary, deleted