CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND FIELD DIRECTOR TIGER PROJECT SARISKA,SARISKA ALWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD TDS, ALWAR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no
ITA 470/JPR/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur08 Nov 2023AY 2010-11
Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. Nos. 450, 466, 470 to 475/JP/2023 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2016-17, 2009-10, 2010-11 to 2015-16 M/s Conservator of Forest and Field Tiger Project Sariska, Alwar cuke Vs. The Income Tax Officer (TDS), Alwar LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAALC 1579 N vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. Saajan Saini (Adv.) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue b
For Appellant: Sh. Saajan Saini (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Arvind Kumar (CIT) &
Section 201(1)
8. Thus EOCs are inteorai stakeholders being envisaged under the 'Basic Objectives' of National Forest Policy.1988 and State Govt. Policy as above. These are constituted by and under the order of the government mandated under the statutory policy not by the EDC's itself or ossessee.
These
EDC's are instrumentality of Gram
Sabha/Panchayat succinctly put, they ore their extended
