BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ITO TDS-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: Or At The Time Of Appellate Hearing.”

TDS has provided the certified copies of these order on 06/04/2024. Thereafter the appeal documents had been prepared and the appeal has been submitted before your goodself within 60 days of the receipts of the true certified copy of the orders. It is therefore requested kindly condone the said delay

BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ITO TDS-1, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: Or At The Time Of Appellate Hearing.”

TDS has provided the certified copies of these order on 06/04/2024. Thereafter the appeal documents had been prepared and the appeal has been submitted before your goodself within 60 days of the receipts of the true certified copy of the orders. It is therefore requested kindly condone the said delay

BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ADDL.CIT(TDS), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: Or At The Time Of Appellate Hearing.”

TDS has provided the certified copies of these order on 06/04/2024. Thereafter the appeal documents had been prepared and the appeal has been submitted before your goodself within 60 days of the receipts of the true certified copy of the orders. It is therefore requested kindly condone the said delay

BANK OF INDIA,JAIPUR vs. ADDL.CIT(TDS), JAIPUR, JAIPUR

Bench: Or At The Time Of Appellate Hearing.”

TDS has provided the certified copies of these order on 06/04/2024. Thereafter the appeal documents had been prepared and the appeal has been submitted before your goodself within 60 days of the receipts of the true certified copy of the orders. It is therefore requested kindly condone the said delay

PRAKASH SHARMA,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ALWAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: SHRI MANISH BORAD (Accountant Member), DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

condonation of delay is a significant and relevant fact (vi) It is to be kept in mind that adherence to strict proof should not affect public justice and cause public mischief because the courts are required to be vigilant so that in the ultimate eventuate there is no real failure of justice. (vii) The concept of liberal approach

SUB TREASURY OFFICER,ASIND , BHILWARA vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

TDS) there were delay of 3 days in filing these appeals. The ld AR also filed applications for condoning the delay

SUB TREASURY OFFICER,ASIND , BHILWARA vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

TDS) there were delay of 3 days in filing these appeals. The ld AR also filed applications for condoning the delay

SUB TREASURY OFFICER,ASIND , BHILWARA vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

TDS) there were delay of 3 days in filing these appeals. The ld AR also filed applications for condoning the delay

SUB TREASURY OFFICER,ASIND , BHILWARA vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

TDS) there were delay of 3 days in filing these appeals. The ld AR also filed applications for condoning the delay

GOVT. SENIOR UPADHAYAY SANSKRIT SCHOOL, SEWAR,AJMER vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn

TDS) 4. In all these appeals, there is delay of 43 days in filing the present appeals. In these appeals also, the assessee has applied for withdrawal of appeale. During the course of hearing, the ld AR submitted that the assessee has filed the present appeals against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) alongwith an application seeking condonation

GOVT. SENIOR UPADHAYAY SANSKRIT SCHOOL, SEWAR,AJMER vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn

TDS) 4. In all these appeals, there is delay of 43 days in filing the present appeals. In these appeals also, the assessee has applied for withdrawal of appeale. During the course of hearing, the ld AR submitted that the assessee has filed the present appeals against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) alongwith an application seeking condonation

GOVT. SENIOR UPADHAYAY SANSKRIT SCHOOL, SEWAR,AJMER vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC (TDS), GHAJIABAD

In the result, all these appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn

TDS) 4. In all these appeals, there is delay of 43 days in filing the present appeals. In these appeals also, the assessee has applied for withdrawal of appeale. During the course of hearing, the ld AR submitted that the assessee has filed the present appeals against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) alongwith an application seeking condonation

AEN, RURAL, AVVNL,KISHANGARH vs. DCIT, CPC(TDS), GHAZIABAD

In the result, this appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: The Tribunal In Order For Him To Take Appropriate Action Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme & It Was Therefore Requested To Consider The Assessee’S Condonation Application.

delay of 67 days in filing the present appeal. In this appeal also, the assesse has applied for withdrawal of this appeal. During the course of hearing, the ld AR submitted that the assessee has 2 AEN Rural AVVNL Vs ACIT(TDS) filed the present appeal against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) alongwith an application seeking condonation

GOBIND CHHANGOMAL SAJNANI,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1),JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are allowed for

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member)

condonation of huge delay of over 26 months cannot be granted in this case. The appeal deserves to be dismissed being non maintainable. 5. In the interest of natural justice, the matter is examined on merits as well. 6. The written submission of the appellant filed electronically on e-filing portal is re- produced below: "Mr. Gobind C Sajnanı

SINGODWALA WAREHOUSING AND LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED,JAIPUR vs. ITO WD 6(4), JAIPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI GAGAN GOYAL (Accountant Member)

condoned. However, the ld. AR of the assessee prayed that the appeal of the assessee be restored to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for afresh hearing by providing one more opportunity. From the records, it is noticed that the return of the assessee was processed by CPC u/s 143(1) on 24- 08-2022 wherein an amount

AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED, BHUPALSAGAR,BHUPALSAGAR vs. ITO (TDS), CHITTORGARH, BHUPALSAGAR, CHITTORGARH

In the results, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

Bench: Moving Towards The Facts Of The Case We Would Like To Mention

condone the delay of 3636 days before Ld. CIT(A). 10. Now coming to the fact of the case bench noted that the intimation u/s 200A/206CB was issued on 12.03.2014 levying a fee of Rs. 58,100/- u/s 234E of the Act, for the alleged delay in filing quarterly statement of TDS

AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED, BHUPALSAGAR,BHUPALSAGAR vs. ITO (TDS), CHITTORGARH, CHITTORGARH

In the results, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

Bench: Moving Towards The Facts Of The Case We Would Like To Mention

condone the delay of 3636 days before Ld. CIT(A). 10. Now coming to the fact of the case bench noted that the intimation u/s 200A/206CB was issued on 12.03.2014 levying a fee of Rs. 58,100/- u/s 234E of the Act, for the alleged delay in filing quarterly statement of TDS

AJMER VIDYUT NIGAM LIMITED, BHUPALSAGAR,BHUPALSAGAR vs. ITO (TDS), CHITTORGARH, BHUPALSAGAR

In the results, the appeal of the assessee in ITA no

Bench: Moving Towards The Facts Of The Case We Would Like To Mention

condone the delay of 3636 days before Ld. CIT(A). 10. Now coming to the fact of the case bench noted that the intimation u/s 200A/206CB was issued on 12.03.2014 levying a fee of Rs. 58,100/- u/s 234E of the Act, for the alleged delay in filing quarterly statement of TDS