BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 263(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai750Delhi712Bangalore366Karnataka261Kolkata239Chennai183Pune170Ahmedabad161Jaipur145Hyderabad93Indore85Chandigarh73Cochin60Calcutta51Visakhapatnam44Rajkot40Surat40Cuttack22Jodhpur22Raipur22Guwahati21Lucknow18Agra17Nagpur17Amritsar9SC8Telangana7Rajasthan6Varanasi6Dehradun6Panaji3Jabalpur3Allahabad2Ranchi2Orissa1Kerala1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5Section 148(1)4Section 2633Section 56(2)(vii)2Section 1472Section 1392Section 12Capital Gains2Revision u/s 263

RITA MANCHHANI ,JABALPUR vs. PR. CIT-1 JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‘s appeal is dismissed on the afore-said terms

ITA 19/JAB/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Nov 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‘Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Rahul Bardia, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 56(2)(vii)

263 dated 30/3/2022 in the case of SM (PB pgs. 128 - 138), the co-owner, reads as under: ‗7. After perusal of the all the reply and relevant documents available on record, it is found that the submission of the assessee on the issue of provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(b) as the order

SHRI VINOD KUMAR CHATE,JABALPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, JABALPUR

2
ITA 60/JAB/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Mar 2022AY 2012-13
Section 1Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148(1)

1) at Rs. 30,28,821, brought to assessment vide order u/s. 143(3) r/w s. 147 dated 13/11/2014. The same was subject to revision. The Assessing Officer (AO) had, in the view of the Administrative Commissioner, failed to examine the Vinod Kumar Chate (Asst. Yr. 2012-13) applicability of section 50C. In fact, the land had been awarded

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2 (3), JABALPUR vs. SHRI VINOD KUMAR CHATE, JABALPUR

ITA 134/JAB/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Mar 2022AY 2012-13
Section 1Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148(1)

1) at Rs. 30,28,821, brought to assessment vide order u/s. 143(3) r/w s. 147 dated 13/11/2014. The same was subject to revision. The Assessing Officer (AO) had, in the view of the Administrative Commissioner, failed to examine the Vinod Kumar Chate (Asst. Yr. 2012-13) applicability of section 50C. In fact, the land had been awarded