BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

62 results for “section 68”+ Section 77clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi2,839Mumbai2,279Bangalore821Karnataka621Chennai614Ahmedabad583Jaipur492Kolkata455Hyderabad435Indore312Pune310Surat262Chandigarh256Cochin220Raipur106Visakhapatnam104Agra99Rajkot89Telangana79Cuttack71Nagpur67Jabalpur62Calcutta61Lucknow52Amritsar48SC44Allahabad35Ranchi34Guwahati32Panaji30Jodhpur25Dehradun13Patna10Orissa8Varanasi7Rajasthan7Andhra Pradesh1Kerala1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Uttarakhand1

Key Topics

TDS53Exemption50Section 80P10Section 143(3)8Section 1488Addition to Income7Disallowance5Section 44A4Section 132(1)4Section 131(1)(d)

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2) , JABALPUR vs. SHRI DEEPAK JAISWAL, JABALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee on this ground is partly allowed and that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 76/JAB/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Garima Chaudhary, CIT-DR
Section 68

section 68 by accepting the additional evidences which was never confronted to AO for cross examination? 3. Any other ground as may be adduced at the time of hearing. 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of cross objection are as under:- 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case the learned CIT (A) grossly

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-KATNI, KATNI vs. M/S. GAJRAJ MINING PVT. L:TD., SINGRAULI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as assessee is dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 62 · Page 1 of 4

4
Section 1474
Search & Seizure4
ITA 27/JAB/2020[2017-18]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jabalpur
30 Nov 2023
AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT(DR)
Section 2Section 36(1)(iii)Section 43B

77,81743/-, travelling expenses of Rs. 50,80,623/- and business promotion expenses of Rs. 2,82,229/-. The entire expense were to the tune of Rs. 2,05,82,834/-. Therefore, the AO on ad-hoc basis disallowed sum of Rs. 20,00,000/- and added back to the income of the appellant holding that these expenses

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SATNA vs. SHRI JAMMU BEG,

In the result, the levy of penalty is cancelled and the appeal of the appellant is allowed

ITA 196/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: FixedITAT Jabalpur20 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleacit, Vs. Shri Jammu Beg, Satna, M/S Mirza Transport, Madhya Pradesh. Main Road, Waidhan, Singrauli. Madhya Pradesh.

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271D

77,280/-.Subsequently the case was selected for scrutiny and notice u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act was issued. In compliance to the notice, the Ld. AR of the assessee appeared from time to time and submitted the details and the case was discussed. The AO dealt on the facts with respect to unsecured loans accepted

VICKY NAVANI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), JABALPUR, WARD )), JABALPUR

In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 124/JAB/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 253(3)Section 271Section 271BSection 273BSection 275Section 44A

77 [Principal Commissioner or] Commissioner or the order of revision under section 263 or section 264 is passed: I.T.A. No.124/JAB/2024 Assessment Year:2016-17 9 Provided further that the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 274 shall apply in respect of the order imposing or enhancing or reducing penalty under this sub-section

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, all the three appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 151/JAB/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, Advocate & ShFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80P

77,776 without properly appreciating the facts and even otherwise appellant is eligible for deduction under section 80P of the act. ADDITIONAL GROUND 6. The AO was not justified in passing order under section 147 of the Act without issuing any notice under section 148 as the notice issued under section 148 was not issued

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, all the three appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 149/JAB/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, Advocate & ShFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80P

77,776 without properly appreciating the facts and even otherwise appellant is eligible for deduction under section 80P of the act. ADDITIONAL GROUND 6. The AO was not justified in passing order under section 147 of the Act without issuing any notice under section 148 as the notice issued under section 148 was not issued

M/S SHOBHA MINERALS (KEVLARI),JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL CIRCLE, JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed and the Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 51/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Feb 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Aroraassessment Year:2015-16 M/S. Shobha Minerals (Kevlari) Vs. Asst. Cit, 765 Near Anand Talkies, Central Circle, Napier Town, Jabalpur Jabalpur [Pan: Abifs 4245A] Assessment Year:2015-16 Asst. Cit(Central), Vs. M/S. Shobha Minerals (Kevlari) Jabalpur 765 Near Anand Talkies, Napier Town, Jabalpur [Pan: Abifs 4245A] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year:2015-16 M/S. Shobha Minerals (Dhamki) Vs. Asst. Cit, 765 Near Anand Talkies, Central Circle, Napier Town, Jabalpur Jabalpur [Pan: Abmfs5899N] Assessment Year:2015-16 Asst. Cit(Central), Vs. M/S. Shobha Minerals (Dhamki) Jabalpur 765 Near Anand Talkies, Napier Town, Jabalpur [Pan: Abmfs 5899N] (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 131(1)(d)Section 132(1)Section 143(3)

section ‘Open cast working’. The material, after being dumped at a separate place at the site, is screened and crushed with a mobile crusher/screener, and again screened, and then sorted manually. The output is in the form of ‘fines’ (powder form, i.e., particle size: 0-10 mm), arising on first screening; and ‘lumps’ (granules/pebbles of different sizes

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. M/S SHOBHA MINERALS (KEVLARI), JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed and the Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 77/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Feb 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Aroraassessment Year:2015-16 M/S. Shobha Minerals (Kevlari) Vs. Asst. Cit, 765 Near Anand Talkies, Central Circle, Napier Town, Jabalpur Jabalpur [Pan: Abifs 4245A] Assessment Year:2015-16 Asst. Cit(Central), Vs. M/S. Shobha Minerals (Kevlari) Jabalpur 765 Near Anand Talkies, Napier Town, Jabalpur [Pan: Abifs 4245A] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year:2015-16 M/S. Shobha Minerals (Dhamki) Vs. Asst. Cit, 765 Near Anand Talkies, Central Circle, Napier Town, Jabalpur Jabalpur [Pan: Abmfs5899N] Assessment Year:2015-16 Asst. Cit(Central), Vs. M/S. Shobha Minerals (Dhamki) Jabalpur 765 Near Anand Talkies, Napier Town, Jabalpur [Pan: Abmfs 5899N] (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 131(1)(d)Section 132(1)Section 143(3)

section ‘Open cast working’. The material, after being dumped at a separate place at the site, is screened and crushed with a mobile crusher/screener, and again screened, and then sorted manually. The output is in the form of ‘fines’ (powder form, i.e., particle size: 0-10 mm), arising on first screening; and ‘lumps’ (granules/pebbles of different sizes

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. M/S SHOBHA MINERALS (DHAMKI), JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed and the Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 78/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Feb 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Aroraassessment Year:2015-16 M/S. Shobha Minerals (Kevlari) Vs. Asst. Cit, 765 Near Anand Talkies, Central Circle, Napier Town, Jabalpur Jabalpur [Pan: Abifs 4245A] Assessment Year:2015-16 Asst. Cit(Central), Vs. M/S. Shobha Minerals (Kevlari) Jabalpur 765 Near Anand Talkies, Napier Town, Jabalpur [Pan: Abifs 4245A] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year:2015-16 M/S. Shobha Minerals (Dhamki) Vs. Asst. Cit, 765 Near Anand Talkies, Central Circle, Napier Town, Jabalpur Jabalpur [Pan: Abmfs5899N] Assessment Year:2015-16 Asst. Cit(Central), Vs. M/S. Shobha Minerals (Dhamki) Jabalpur 765 Near Anand Talkies, Napier Town, Jabalpur [Pan: Abmfs 5899N] (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 131(1)(d)Section 132(1)Section 143(3)

section ‘Open cast working’. The material, after being dumped at a separate place at the site, is screened and crushed with a mobile crusher/screener, and again screened, and then sorted manually. The output is in the form of ‘fines’ (powder form, i.e., particle size: 0-10 mm), arising on first screening; and ‘lumps’ (granules/pebbles of different sizes

M/S SHOBHA MINERALS (DHAMKI),JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL CIRCLE, JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessees are allowed and the Revenue’s appeals are dismissed

ITA 52/JAB/2018[2015-16 (Quarter: 2)]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Feb 2020

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Aroraassessment Year:2015-16 M/S. Shobha Minerals (Kevlari) Vs. Asst. Cit, 765 Near Anand Talkies, Central Circle, Napier Town, Jabalpur Jabalpur [Pan: Abifs 4245A] Assessment Year:2015-16 Asst. Cit(Central), Vs. M/S. Shobha Minerals (Kevlari) Jabalpur 765 Near Anand Talkies, Napier Town, Jabalpur [Pan: Abifs 4245A] (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year:2015-16 M/S. Shobha Minerals (Dhamki) Vs. Asst. Cit, 765 Near Anand Talkies, Central Circle, Napier Town, Jabalpur Jabalpur [Pan: Abmfs5899N] Assessment Year:2015-16 Asst. Cit(Central), Vs. M/S. Shobha Minerals (Dhamki) Jabalpur 765 Near Anand Talkies, Napier Town, Jabalpur [Pan: Abmfs 5899N] (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 131(1)(d)Section 132(1)Section 143(3)

section ‘Open cast working’. The material, after being dumped at a separate place at the site, is screened and crushed with a mobile crusher/screener, and again screened, and then sorted manually. The output is in the form of ‘fines’ (powder form, i.e., particle size: 0-10 mm), arising on first screening; and ‘lumps’ (granules/pebbles of different sizes

SHRI SUBHASH KUMAR AAHI,SATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-SATNA, SATNA

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 24/JAB/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur12 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Nikhil Choudhary

For Respondent: Shri N.M. Prasad, Sr. DR 1
Section 143(3)Section 250

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 29.03.2016, passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-Satna, was illegal and bad in law. 3. That the additions so made and confirmed by CIT(A)-1, Jabalpur being contrary to the provisions of law and facts may kindly be deleted in full. 4. That

HAJARIMAL MISHRIMAL BAFANA vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE,

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for AY 2004-05 is dismissed, and that of AY 2005-06 is partly allowed

ITA 176/JAB/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Nov 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Mehrotra Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 254(2)Section 43B

sections 4 & 5 of the Act. Given the clear law, the issue arising to our mind is principally one of fact. There is no evidence whatsoever that any settlement has been, as claimed, arrived at between the parties, much less during the current year, i.e., on the first day of the accounting year, on which the debit notes were

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1), JABALPUR vs. M/S KEMTANI PROJECTS PVT. LTD., JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 110/JAB/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

68 IT(SS)A Shri Govind Prasad Pandey, Shri Sanjay Seth, No.32/Jab/18 Dy. Commissioner of FF-2, Manpreet Apartment, C.A. and Shri 2014-15 Income Tax (Central), Kripal Chowk, Gupteshwar, Sachin Bajpai, Jabalpur Madan Mahal, Jabalpur Advocate PAN No. ADZPP7413J M/s. Ampee Machinery Income Tax Officer Centre, Jail Road, Friends 2012-13 None Ward- Tikamgarh Colony, Tikamgarh PAN No. AAIFM1477D

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, REWA vs. SHRI RAMAYAN PRASAD DUBEY, REWA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 31/JAB/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

68 IT(SS)A Shri Govind Prasad Pandey, Shri Sanjay Seth, No.32/Jab/18 Dy. Commissioner of FF-2, Manpreet Apartment, C.A. and Shri 2014-15 Income Tax (Central), Kripal Chowk, Gupteshwar, Sachin Bajpai, Jabalpur Madan Mahal, Jabalpur Advocate PAN No. ADZPP7413J M/s. Ampee Machinery Income Tax Officer Centre, Jail Road, Friends 2012-13 None Ward- Tikamgarh Colony, Tikamgarh PAN No. AAIFM1477D

DY. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) vs. J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 152/JAB/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

68 IT(SS)A Shri Govind Prasad Pandey, Shri Sanjay Seth, No.32/Jab/18 Dy. Commissioner of FF-2, Manpreet Apartment, C.A. and Shri 2014-15 Income Tax (Central), Kripal Chowk, Gupteshwar, Sachin Bajpai, Jabalpur Madan Mahal, Jabalpur Advocate PAN No. ADZPP7413J M/s. Ampee Machinery Income Tax Officer Centre, Jail Road, Friends 2012-13 None Ward- Tikamgarh Colony, Tikamgarh PAN No. AAIFM1477D

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1(1), JABALPUR vs. MAHESH KUMAR KEMTANI, JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 243/JAB/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

68 IT(SS)A Shri Govind Prasad Pandey, Shri Sanjay Seth, No.32/Jab/18 Dy. Commissioner of FF-2, Manpreet Apartment, C.A. and Shri 2014-15 Income Tax (Central), Kripal Chowk, Gupteshwar, Sachin Bajpai, Jabalpur Madan Mahal, Jabalpur Advocate PAN No. ADZPP7413J M/s. Ampee Machinery Income Tax Officer Centre, Jail Road, Friends 2012-13 None Ward- Tikamgarh Colony, Tikamgarh PAN No. AAIFM1477D

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(5), JABALPUR vs. M/S. SURESH KUMAR UPADHYAY AND SONS (HUF), JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 229/JAB/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

68 IT(SS)A Shri Govind Prasad Pandey, Shri Sanjay Seth, No.32/Jab/18 Dy. Commissioner of FF-2, Manpreet Apartment, C.A. and Shri 2014-15 Income Tax (Central), Kripal Chowk, Gupteshwar, Sachin Bajpai, Jabalpur Madan Mahal, Jabalpur Advocate PAN No. ADZPP7413J M/s. Ampee Machinery Income Tax Officer Centre, Jail Road, Friends 2012-13 None Ward- Tikamgarh Colony, Tikamgarh PAN No. AAIFM1477D

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SATNA vs. SHRI BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA (HUF), SATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 227/JAB/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

68 IT(SS)A Shri Govind Prasad Pandey, Shri Sanjay Seth, No.32/Jab/18 Dy. Commissioner of FF-2, Manpreet Apartment, C.A. and Shri 2014-15 Income Tax (Central), Kripal Chowk, Gupteshwar, Sachin Bajpai, Jabalpur Madan Mahal, Jabalpur Advocate PAN No. ADZPP7413J M/s. Ampee Machinery Income Tax Officer Centre, Jail Road, Friends 2012-13 None Ward- Tikamgarh Colony, Tikamgarh PAN No. AAIFM1477D

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SATNA, SATNA vs. SHRI ANURAG SHRIVASTAVA, SATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 222/JAB/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

68 IT(SS)A Shri Govind Prasad Pandey, Shri Sanjay Seth, No.32/Jab/18 Dy. Commissioner of FF-2, Manpreet Apartment, C.A. and Shri 2014-15 Income Tax (Central), Kripal Chowk, Gupteshwar, Sachin Bajpai, Jabalpur Madan Mahal, Jabalpur Advocate PAN No. ADZPP7413J M/s. Ampee Machinery Income Tax Officer Centre, Jail Road, Friends 2012-13 None Ward- Tikamgarh Colony, Tikamgarh PAN No. AAIFM1477D

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. MADHYA PRADESH POWER GENERATING CO. LTD., JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 198/JAB/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

68 IT(SS)A Shri Govind Prasad Pandey, Shri Sanjay Seth, No.32/Jab/18 Dy. Commissioner of FF-2, Manpreet Apartment, C.A. and Shri 2014-15 Income Tax (Central), Kripal Chowk, Gupteshwar, Sachin Bajpai, Jabalpur Madan Mahal, Jabalpur Advocate PAN No. ADZPP7413J M/s. Ampee Machinery Income Tax Officer Centre, Jail Road, Friends 2012-13 None Ward- Tikamgarh Colony, Tikamgarh PAN No. AAIFM1477D