BHUPENDRA SINGH,NARSINGHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NARSINGHPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 141/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudharyassessment Year: 2017-18 Bhupendra Singh V. The Income Tax Officer, 18, Bhabha Ward, Gadarawara Ward Narsinghpur, Narsinghpur (Mp)-487551. Narsinghpur (Mp)- 487001. Tan/Pan:Gbdps6826N (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Shailendra S. Thakur, Ca Shri Avinash Mishra, Ca Respondent By: Shri Shravan Kumar Meena, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 21 08 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 08 2025 O R D E R
For Appellant: Shri Shailendra S. Thakur, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shravan Kumar Meena, CIT(DR)
Section 147Section 148Section 69Section 69A
74,889/- since there was no compliance of notices by the assessee, the Assessing Officer proceeded to make assessment ex parte to the assessee. Thereby, he assessed income at Rs.3,30,68,650/- treating the money credited in his bank account as unexplained. Aggrieved by this,
Page 3 of 5
the assessee preferred appeal before