BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

74 results for “section 68”+ Section 50(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,493Mumbai4,583Bangalore1,364Kolkata1,140Ahmedabad1,089Chennai1,051Jaipur896Hyderabad776Karnataka688Pune592Surat497Chandigarh494Indore490Raipur290Cochin287Rajkot209Visakhapatnam204Nagpur143Cuttack130Amritsar123Telangana122Lucknow112Guwahati100Calcutta84Jabalpur74Allahabad72Jodhpur70Agra69SC65Ranchi62Patna53Panaji41Dehradun29Varanasi18Rajasthan12Orissa11Kerala5Uttarakhand4Gauhati3ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1

Key Topics

TDS52Exemption50Addition to Income19Section 143(3)18Section 6813Section 1447Cash Deposit7Section 143(2)6Search & Seizure6Section 153A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. SHRI GAURAV AGRAWAL, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 39/JAB/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur01 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Garima Chaudhary, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 127(2)Section 132Section 153A

68,950/- on account of unaccounted money and Rs. 1,04,33,573/- on account of unexplained transaction in books of account. 6. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) deleted addition of Rs. 67,85,00,100/- made by the AO on account of unexplained cash credit, Rs. 2,58,60,033/- made

Showing 1–20 of 74 · Page 1 of 4

4
Section 1274
Section 115B4

SHRI GAURAV AGRAWAL,JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 37/JAB/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur01 Dec 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Garima Chaudhary, CIT-DR
Section 127Section 127(2)Section 132Section 153A

68,950/- on account of unaccounted money and Rs. 1,04,33,573/- on account of unexplained transaction in books of account. 6. Aggrieved, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) deleted addition of Rs. 67,85,00,100/- made by the AO on account of unexplained cash credit, Rs. 2,58,60,033/- made

VICKY NAVANI,JABALPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), JABALPUR, WARD )), JABALPUR

In the result, for statistical purposes, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 124/JAB/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Feb 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

Section 253(3)Section 271Section 271BSection 273BSection 275Section 44A

68. Substituted by the Taxation Laws Act, 1970, w.e.f. 1-4-1971. 69. Renumbered by the Direct Tax Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1989, w.e.f. 1-4-1989. 70. Substituted for clauses (a) and (b) by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987, w.e.f. 1-4-1989. Prior to its substitution, clause (a) was amended by the Finance (No. 2

JAINAM GROUP CHHINDWARA,CHHINDWARA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE (NFAC) DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed statistical purposes

ITA 83/JAB/2024[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Sept 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Rahul Bardia, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 250Section 68

2. The facts of the case are that the Department came into the possession of information, that the assessee had deposited huge amounts in its bank account held with Vijaya Bank, Sanichara Bazar, Chhindwara during the F.Y. 2012-13. The total deposits during the year were Rs.80,50,000/- out of which Rs. 15,00,000/- had been deposited

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 104/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

section 194J on the payment of Rs. 29,500/- made to 3 different parties. Hence, the assessee gets the relief of Rs.29,500/-. (ii) As regard the payment of Rs. 50,000/- made to Shri V Ravindra Prasad Advocate, the assessee submitted that V. Ravendra Prasad is a regular assessee of income and has included the payment received from

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1), JABALPUR vs. SHRI SANDESH KUMAR JAIN, JABALPUR

In the result, the Revenue‟s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 41/JAB/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur27 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Respondent: Shri Rahul Bardia, FCA
Section 115BSection 133ASection 143(3)Section 28Section 68Section 69Section 69B

section 1(2) of the said Act). 4. We have heard the parties, and perused the material on record. 4.1 We find little substance in the assessee‟s case qua the head of income. The argument is, to begin with, self-contradictory. If it is a business profit, the same cannot be determined on 29/11/2016 (or 30/11/2016, the date

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. CHETANAYA PROMOTERS AND DEVLOPERS,, JABALPUR

In the result, on this ground, appeal of the Revenue as well as appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 133/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Garima Chaudhary, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 292BSection 43C

68 ITR 240, and CIT v Bakelal Vaidya [1971] 79 ITR 594 and hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court decision in the case of CIT v Moped and Machines 2006] 281 ITR 52 and hon ble ITAT Jabalpur Bench decision in the case of ACIT v Thermoflics India [1997] 60 ITD 554 the ld CIT(A) was fully justified

NAGAR PANCHAYAT,BANDA vs. THE ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE SAGAR, SAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 118/JAB/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 May 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2012-13 Nagar Panchayat, Banda, Vs. The Acit, Nagar Parishad Building, Banda, Sagar, Circle Sagar, Sagar Banda Nagar S.O. Madhya Pradesh Pan:Aaaln0246R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. Milind Wadhwani, C.A. Revenue By: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 19.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.05.2025 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Nfac Dated 7.05.2024 Whereby The Ld. Cit(A) Has Dismissed The Appeal Of The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Dcit, Circle-Sagar, Madhya Pradesh Passed On 10.12.2019 Under Section 147 R.W.S. 144 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under:- “1. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre ('Nfac) Erred In Upholding The Action Of The Ld. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-Sagar ('Ao) In Adding A Sum Of Rs. 68,21,182/- To The Income Of The Assessee U/S. 69A As Unexplained Money. 2. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Assessment Order Dated 10.12.2019 Is Without Jurisdiction, Bad In Law & Liable To Be Quashed.3 3. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Assessment Order Is Opposed To The Principles Of Equity, Natural Justice & Fair Play.

For Appellant: Sh. Milind Wadhwani, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(b)Section 69A

2 A.Y. 2012-13 Nagar Panchyat, Banda AO added the amount of Rs.68,21,182/- to the income of the assessee under section 69A of the Income Tax Act. 3. Aggrieved with this addition, the assessee filed an appeal before the ld. CIT(A), Jabalpur which was subsequently migrated to the National Faceless Appeal Centre

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2) , JABALPUR vs. SHRI DEEPAK JAISWAL, JABALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee on this ground is partly allowed and that of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 76/JAB/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Garima Chaudhary, CIT-DR
Section 68

2: Particulars Opening Amount Amount Closing Balance received paid balance Abhishek Jaiswal 6,50,000 1,50,000 Abhishek Tiwari 7,00,000 Anshu Jaiswal 37,98,340 13,49,170 Arun Kumar Rai 8,00,000 Deepak Jaiswal 77,50,000 77,50,000 Kiran Jaiswal 28,97,042 28,97,042 M.D. Associte

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-KATNI, KATNI vs. M/S. GAJRAJ MINING PVT. L:TD., SINGRAULI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as assessee is dismissed

ITA 27/JAB/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT(DR)
Section 2Section 36(1)(iii)Section 43B

50,80,623/- and business promotion expenses of Rs. 2,82,229/-. The entire expense were to the tune of Rs. 2,05,82,834/-. Therefore, the AO on ad-hoc basis disallowed sum of Rs. 20,00,000/- and added back to the income of the appellant holding that these expenses are not verifiable. The ld. CIT(A) restricted

AMIT KUMAR YADAV,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SEONI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 166/JAB/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. G.N. Purohit, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 250Section 271ASection 272A(1)(d)

2) and 142(1) were issued to the assessee, but the assessee did not submit any reply to these notices. The ld. AO, thereafter, issued a show cause notice dated 24.01.2021, but the assessee did not respond to the same. Therefore, the ld. AO concluded that the assessee had nothing to say in this regard and he added back

AMIT KUMAR YADAV,SEONI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, SEONI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal in ITA No

ITA 168/JAB/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. G.N. Purohit, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 250Section 271ASection 272A(1)(d)

2) and 142(1) were issued to the assessee, but the assessee did not submit any reply to these notices. The ld. AO, thereafter, issued a show cause notice dated 24.01.2021, but the assessee did not respond to the same. Therefore, the ld. AO concluded that the assessee had nothing to say in this regard and he added back

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SATNA vs. SHRI ANURAG SHRIVASTAVA, SATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 128/JAB/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

50 ITA Shri Kailash Kumar Shukala, Dy. Commissioner of Shri Arun Grover No.233/Jab/18 818, Gulab Bhawan, 2010-11 Income Tax Circle 1(1), and Shri Ashish Hathital, Jabalpur Jabalpur Ternain, C.As PAN No. AJFPS0322P 51 & ITA No.243- Shri Mahesh Kumar 52 244/Jab/18 2009-10 Dy. Commissioner of Kemtani, 123, Shitalpuri Shri Rahul Bardia, & 2011- Income Tax Circle 1(1), Sarthak

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, REWA vs. SHRI RAMAYAN PRASAD DUBEY, REWA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 31/JAB/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

50 ITA Shri Kailash Kumar Shukala, Dy. Commissioner of Shri Arun Grover No.233/Jab/18 818, Gulab Bhawan, 2010-11 Income Tax Circle 1(1), and Shri Ashish Hathital, Jabalpur Jabalpur Ternain, C.As PAN No. AJFPS0322P 51 & ITA No.243- Shri Mahesh Kumar 52 244/Jab/18 2009-10 Dy. Commissioner of Kemtani, 123, Shitalpuri Shri Rahul Bardia, & 2011- Income Tax Circle 1(1), Sarthak

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) vs. J.P. TOBACCO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. PATHARIA PHATAK,

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 90/JAB/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

50 ITA Shri Kailash Kumar Shukala, Dy. Commissioner of Shri Arun Grover No.233/Jab/18 818, Gulab Bhawan, 2010-11 Income Tax Circle 1(1), and Shri Ashish Hathital, Jabalpur Jabalpur Ternain, C.As PAN No. AJFPS0322P 51 & ITA No.243- Shri Mahesh Kumar 52 244/Jab/18 2009-10 Dy. Commissioner of Kemtani, 123, Shitalpuri Shri Rahul Bardia, & 2011- Income Tax Circle 1(1), Sarthak

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), JABALPUR vs. SHRI VIMAL AGRAWAL (HUF), JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 41/JAB/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

50 ITA Shri Kailash Kumar Shukala, Dy. Commissioner of Shri Arun Grover No.233/Jab/18 818, Gulab Bhawan, 2010-11 Income Tax Circle 1(1), and Shri Ashish Hathital, Jabalpur Jabalpur Ternain, C.As PAN No. AJFPS0322P 51 & ITA No.243- Shri Mahesh Kumar 52 244/Jab/18 2009-10 Dy. Commissioner of Kemtani, 123, Shitalpuri Shri Rahul Bardia, & 2011- Income Tax Circle 1(1), Sarthak

ASSISTANCE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SAGAR vs. SHRI MUKESH KUMAR JAIN,, SAGAR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 46/JAB/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

50 ITA Shri Kailash Kumar Shukala, Dy. Commissioner of Shri Arun Grover No.233/Jab/18 818, Gulab Bhawan, 2010-11 Income Tax Circle 1(1), and Shri Ashish Hathital, Jabalpur Jabalpur Ternain, C.As PAN No. AJFPS0322P 51 & ITA No.243- Shri Mahesh Kumar 52 244/Jab/18 2009-10 Dy. Commissioner of Kemtani, 123, Shitalpuri Shri Rahul Bardia, & 2011- Income Tax Circle 1(1), Sarthak

DY. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) vs. J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 152/JAB/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

50 ITA Shri Kailash Kumar Shukala, Dy. Commissioner of Shri Arun Grover No.233/Jab/18 818, Gulab Bhawan, 2010-11 Income Tax Circle 1(1), and Shri Ashish Hathital, Jabalpur Jabalpur Ternain, C.As PAN No. AJFPS0322P 51 & ITA No.243- Shri Mahesh Kumar 52 244/Jab/18 2009-10 Dy. Commissioner of Kemtani, 123, Shitalpuri Shri Rahul Bardia, & 2011- Income Tax Circle 1(1), Sarthak

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1), JABALPUR vs. M/S KEMTANI PROJECTS PVT. LTD., JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 110/JAB/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

50 ITA Shri Kailash Kumar Shukala, Dy. Commissioner of Shri Arun Grover No.233/Jab/18 818, Gulab Bhawan, 2010-11 Income Tax Circle 1(1), and Shri Ashish Hathital, Jabalpur Jabalpur Ternain, C.As PAN No. AJFPS0322P 51 & ITA No.243- Shri Mahesh Kumar 52 244/Jab/18 2009-10 Dy. Commissioner of Kemtani, 123, Shitalpuri Shri Rahul Bardia, & 2011- Income Tax Circle 1(1), Sarthak

DY. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) vs. J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 151/JAB/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

50 ITA Shri Kailash Kumar Shukala, Dy. Commissioner of Shri Arun Grover No.233/Jab/18 818, Gulab Bhawan, 2010-11 Income Tax Circle 1(1), and Shri Ashish Hathital, Jabalpur Jabalpur Ternain, C.As PAN No. AJFPS0322P 51 & ITA No.243- Shri Mahesh Kumar 52 244/Jab/18 2009-10 Dy. Commissioner of Kemtani, 123, Shitalpuri Shri Rahul Bardia, & 2011- Income Tax Circle 1(1), Sarthak